METAL HEAD
Closed Account
for me its the cheeks:o
What exactly makes a female ass "hot"???
- Thread starter Facial_King
- Start date
a good mix of fat and muscle. so u can get the firmness and perkyness, but also the round, smooth, jigglyness as well. nicely rounded, not insanely big. kinda wide, so it tapers nicely from the hips. and u know how when a girl bends over and there is that little space in between her thighs, under her pussy? not really much of an ass thing, i guess, but man, that is hot!
Any Star Members care to contribute to this thread?
Ass and legs is the best thing about a girl. This is the girl that got me fascinated with bums.
http://ru.fishki.net/picsw/022007/21/girls/zdenka/05_zdenka_179138.jpg
http://ru.fishki.net/picsw/022007/21/girls/zdenka/05_zdenka_179138.jpg
It's shape, it's roundness, it's bubble. 
I can only think of three women when it comes to this subject......Pam Rodriguez, Mayra Veronica and Vida Guerra .....those three are the epitome of "Culo Caliente"
You sound like a candidate to contribute to my thread devoted to the space between the thighs under the pussy: http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=223859
I'm hardly arguing with you - it's a very fine ass - but it's funny that would be the girl (or the pic) that would get you into "bums" as there seems to be very little differentiation between her ass and her legs - they sort of blend right into each other. I usually prefer more of a borderline, where the ass clearly starts to cut away (and out from) the leg, saying "Hello! Come and plow me!"
But for every rule I make, there's always an exception. I just enjoy the discussion (and any pics posted, too!) - thanks for your input!
:hatsoff:
As an example of what I was talkin' about in my last post, here's a perfectly hot woman, Kyla Cole, but in my view, her ass is basically a failure, at least in this set (and I'm not sure how a pose or a photographer could improve upon it THAT much) - see the last pic to get my idea:
http://www.galleries.coolios.net/bodyinmind/Kyla_in_Turqueza_by_BodyinMind/
http://www.galleries.coolios.net/bodyinmind/Kyla_in_Turqueza_by_BodyinMind/
HE1FiNEARTiST
Banned
dont know if I'd call that an ass.. but that pussy is nice and inviting
HE1FiNEARTiST
Banned
my opinon of HOT ASS !! i think if the ass cheeks swallow up the g-string, thong, whatever.. its a perfect ass :thumbsup:
Jenny Poussin.. even her sister has a nice ass
http://photos.freeones.com/j_babes/Jenny_Poussin_002/
http://www.jennypoussinvip.com/JennyCathy42.jpg
http://img153.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=86705_Jenny_Cathy_02s_122_889lo.jpg
rachel starr.. dont worry about the set its from.. just ponder and graze upon the beauty.
http://gallys.realitykings.com/mo/8/3.jpg
http://www.pornstarvixen.com/ns/starr/1007.jpg
http://blowjobninjas.bangbros1.com/9063/06.jpg
Jenny Poussin.. even her sister has a nice ass
http://photos.freeones.com/j_babes/Jenny_Poussin_002/
http://www.jennypoussinvip.com/JennyCathy42.jpg
http://img153.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=86705_Jenny_Cathy_02s_122_889lo.jpg
rachel starr.. dont worry about the set its from.. just ponder and graze upon the beauty.
http://gallys.realitykings.com/mo/8/3.jpg
http://www.pornstarvixen.com/ns/starr/1007.jpg
http://blowjobninjas.bangbros1.com/9063/06.jpg
i would have to say its just how she presents it like if it is bigger and she wears tighter pants its hot
Gloria Ordonez surely meets a lot of the criteria !!!
http://www.nsfwceleb.com/2008/07/14/gloria-ordonez-and-her-perfect-ass/
http://www.nsfwceleb.com/2008/07/14/gloria-ordonez-and-her-perfect-ass/
Simple for me ...
It's simple for me, it's the extremities they can sport.
From the front/rear view ...
- How far outward the lower torso is shaped from the midsection of the woman (middle of her stomach, under her breasts). The greater the angle horizontal, instead of vertical, as you glance downward from her mid-section, the more I love it.
- Building upon the first statements, how wide the hips are overall, as well as in comparison to the mid-section. The more width, the more extreme the angle from her mid-section, the less "straight down."
- Ideally she should have a more "horizontal handle" at the top of her hips where the curve from her midsection is turning so horizontal, instead of grabbing the "sides" of her hips, you are grabbing the "top" of her hips.
- The higher the angles start, the wider she will be, the more "round" the buttocks will be. In comparison to the total length of the butt from waist down to rear thighs, the more wide, the more her ass is no longer an oval, but a circle.
- This also results in very wide, thick and powerful thighs. The more "fit'n slender" the woman is, the more powerful and capable her thighs are. This goes against that "built for comfort, not speed" cliche which is wrong for many types of women in my view. I want a woman who is wide, not allegedly fat, and can still ride my manhood better than a skinny, unfit size 4 or 6 (especially if she has no muscles in her legs and even a bit of a overhang gut on a straight figure).
- So width is essential, resulting in an ass that is round -- just as tall as wide -- with wide, supporting thighs and wide, supporting hips. The more extreme the width of the hips-thighs-ass in comparison to the mid-section, the higher it will start up, the more curve to the woman, and the more she will be a hourglass (assuming she's not pear/spoon/bell in shape).
- A nice bonus is when she has a tri-dimple -- two above her ass cheeks and one in her lower back. It's almost like a natural, engineering "verification" that her mid-to-lower form is perfect and heart-shaped.
From the side view, when standing erect but womanly (center of gravity forward) ...
- Her ass should start way high at her midsection. It can be a bubble curve or it can be little curved but a good, extreme angle and not straight down.
- It should then curve more than 120 degrees down and up'n under to form her ass, more like reaching for 150 degrees from where it starts at her mid-section down, around and partially back up to her thighs. The ass should be a significant jut out and well defined from her thighs, and not just melded into them.
- When standing erect but womanly, her stomach -- from the side -- should have no curve, but go straight down until it reaches her hips. At her hips it should go inward and "behind" her thighs, to her womanly apex.
- Ideally the stomach will have an "inner bulge" from the outer midsection and sides, and will be slightly noticeable before going inward below her hips, but not "overhang" and never more than 1" (more like 0.5" or well under 1.5cm) out. I call this the "pussy path" as you look from below her breasts down to her vagina.
- When she "re-centers" her gravity so her body is bent, then the upper-back "curves back" to offset the jutting ass, and the breasts "go back" and "mound" just a bit as they are now resting more on her angled chest. I call this the S-curve when she strikes this "center of gravity" pose if she's busty and butty. :lovecoupl
Additionally ...
- From the front, a woman of a perfect hourglass shape will have as wide of a chest, or almost as wide, as her hips -- both significantly more than her much thinner (at least 25%, if not 33% in the extreme) mid-section. This also makes her likely wide breasts round -- as wide as tall -- possibly hanging if large.
- From the sides, the breasts will jut out like the ass, but only in the opposite direction. If large and hanging, they could ideally jut out as much as the rear, although in most cases it's still less. Extremely rare is a woman who has both a huge rear sticking out far as well as a pair of breasts (at least when she's young'n perky) hanging out as far.
In all honesty, as she ages, we'll get the same sag factor in the ass as the bust, and Iove that as well. I don't need perky to be happy. In fact, I love experiencing age on a woman, especially if I'm there to see the full cycle.
I'll try to find some pictures.
It's simple for me, it's the extremities they can sport.
From the front/rear view ...
- How far outward the lower torso is shaped from the midsection of the woman (middle of her stomach, under her breasts). The greater the angle horizontal, instead of vertical, as you glance downward from her mid-section, the more I love it.
- Building upon the first statements, how wide the hips are overall, as well as in comparison to the mid-section. The more width, the more extreme the angle from her mid-section, the less "straight down."
- Ideally she should have a more "horizontal handle" at the top of her hips where the curve from her midsection is turning so horizontal, instead of grabbing the "sides" of her hips, you are grabbing the "top" of her hips.
- The higher the angles start, the wider she will be, the more "round" the buttocks will be. In comparison to the total length of the butt from waist down to rear thighs, the more wide, the more her ass is no longer an oval, but a circle.
- This also results in very wide, thick and powerful thighs. The more "fit'n slender" the woman is, the more powerful and capable her thighs are. This goes against that "built for comfort, not speed" cliche which is wrong for many types of women in my view. I want a woman who is wide, not allegedly fat, and can still ride my manhood better than a skinny, unfit size 4 or 6 (especially if she has no muscles in her legs and even a bit of a overhang gut on a straight figure).
- So width is essential, resulting in an ass that is round -- just as tall as wide -- with wide, supporting thighs and wide, supporting hips. The more extreme the width of the hips-thighs-ass in comparison to the mid-section, the higher it will start up, the more curve to the woman, and the more she will be a hourglass (assuming she's not pear/spoon/bell in shape).
- A nice bonus is when she has a tri-dimple -- two above her ass cheeks and one in her lower back. It's almost like a natural, engineering "verification" that her mid-to-lower form is perfect and heart-shaped.
From the side view, when standing erect but womanly (center of gravity forward) ...
- Her ass should start way high at her midsection. It can be a bubble curve or it can be little curved but a good, extreme angle and not straight down.
- It should then curve more than 120 degrees down and up'n under to form her ass, more like reaching for 150 degrees from where it starts at her mid-section down, around and partially back up to her thighs. The ass should be a significant jut out and well defined from her thighs, and not just melded into them.
- When standing erect but womanly, her stomach -- from the side -- should have no curve, but go straight down until it reaches her hips. At her hips it should go inward and "behind" her thighs, to her womanly apex.
- Ideally the stomach will have an "inner bulge" from the outer midsection and sides, and will be slightly noticeable before going inward below her hips, but not "overhang" and never more than 1" (more like 0.5" or well under 1.5cm) out. I call this the "pussy path" as you look from below her breasts down to her vagina.
- When she "re-centers" her gravity so her body is bent, then the upper-back "curves back" to offset the jutting ass, and the breasts "go back" and "mound" just a bit as they are now resting more on her angled chest. I call this the S-curve when she strikes this "center of gravity" pose if she's busty and butty. :lovecoupl
Additionally ...
- From the front, a woman of a perfect hourglass shape will have as wide of a chest, or almost as wide, as her hips -- both significantly more than her much thinner (at least 25%, if not 33% in the extreme) mid-section. This also makes her likely wide breasts round -- as wide as tall -- possibly hanging if large.
- From the sides, the breasts will jut out like the ass, but only in the opposite direction. If large and hanging, they could ideally jut out as much as the rear, although in most cases it's still less. Extremely rare is a woman who has both a huge rear sticking out far as well as a pair of breasts (at least when she's young'n perky) hanging out as far.
In all honesty, as she ages, we'll get the same sag factor in the ass as the bust, and Iove that as well. I don't need perky to be happy. In fact, I love experiencing age on a woman, especially if I'm there to see the full cycle.
I'll try to find some pictures.
Previous threads and a couple of example women ...
Just to follow up, the ass often relates to what I call "fucking hips" ...
Full fucking hips (and tummy) ...
Thin (not full) fucking hips ...
Silicone with full, fucking hips (and no boney pelvis-tummy) ...
But to give more direct examples of women, here are a few ...
You can't talk about bust, hips'n ass, let alone S-curves, without mentioning Gianna.
This set shows several of her with that perfect S-curve and how the whole ass comes together, especially in killer side shots in pics 51 and 72:
http://www.frankiebank.com/mystackedwife/window/index.php
More hardcore, the side shot of her in pic 14 in this set really shows why men like to give her the rod because she's the "complete woman" (with her hips'n ass as part of the centerpiece around all the other curves):
http://bar.juggcrew.com/299p/
The best, newest discovery of the hourglass/S-curve combo has to be Karina Hart who is quite extreme in many ways.
These sets with other, already very hourglass women, shows how she tops the bunch -- especially in pic 07 with her in the middle, showing that perfect S-curve:
http://www.bigboobsalert.com/hungary-for-hooters.php
But one of my all-time original favorite pin-ups is Dakota Kelly because she knew how to flaunt her perfect S-curve from the side, while bent, in a post I've rarely ever seen since -- like in pic 09;
http://www.todayboobs.net/b/5/sub/sco/06/dakotak221206/sub11.html
There are countless other examples of women in the "fucking hips" threads above. I want a fit woman who has thighs that can overpower me and fuck my brains out. The thought of "build for comfort and speed" is the ultimate in my view, because I like an excess of woman and choice in how she can fuck me.
Just to follow up, the ass often relates to what I call "fucking hips" ...
Full fucking hips (and tummy) ...
Thin (not full) fucking hips ...
Silicone with full, fucking hips (and no boney pelvis-tummy) ...
But to give more direct examples of women, here are a few ...
You can't talk about bust, hips'n ass, let alone S-curves, without mentioning Gianna.
This set shows several of her with that perfect S-curve and how the whole ass comes together, especially in killer side shots in pics 51 and 72:
http://www.frankiebank.com/mystackedwife/window/index.php
More hardcore, the side shot of her in pic 14 in this set really shows why men like to give her the rod because she's the "complete woman" (with her hips'n ass as part of the centerpiece around all the other curves):
http://bar.juggcrew.com/299p/
The best, newest discovery of the hourglass/S-curve combo has to be Karina Hart who is quite extreme in many ways.
These sets with other, already very hourglass women, shows how she tops the bunch -- especially in pic 07 with her in the middle, showing that perfect S-curve:
http://www.bigboobsalert.com/hungary-for-hooters.php
But one of my all-time original favorite pin-ups is Dakota Kelly because she knew how to flaunt her perfect S-curve from the side, while bent, in a post I've rarely ever seen since -- like in pic 09;
http://www.todayboobs.net/b/5/sub/sco/06/dakotak221206/sub11.html
There are countless other examples of women in the "fucking hips" threads above. I want a fit woman who has thighs that can overpower me and fuck my brains out. The thought of "build for comfort and speed" is the ultimate in my view, because I like an excess of woman and choice in how she can fuck me.
One word which also best describes it is; Peachy.
METAL HEAD
Closed Account
the crack and cheek's
Several nearly flawless butts:
Keyra is always amazing:
http://rpjsyndicate.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/keyra-augustina-black-thong.jpg
but not perfect for me. It has to do with the "oval-tilting toward one another" shape. I prefer rounder, and perhaps ever so slightly fuller
This is the perfect "pop" but lacks in texture and slightly in shape:
http://www.***************/hosted/Selena_greensheet/1/images/SelenaSpice13.jpg
Some asses, even though they aren't perfect by themselves, become incredible when placed with a beautiful girl:
http://www.gyrls.com/upload/show.ph...928532-0000&PA=1172402&image=bubbles_010x.jpg
these three show an interesting array, and the girl on the far right is flawless(lexi belle):
http://content.beautyisdivine.com/hosted/three_sisters/source/15.html
the full set:
http://content.beautyisdivine.com/hosted/three_sisters/index.html
Keyra is always amazing:
http://rpjsyndicate.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/keyra-augustina-black-thong.jpg
but not perfect for me. It has to do with the "oval-tilting toward one another" shape. I prefer rounder, and perhaps ever so slightly fuller
This is the perfect "pop" but lacks in texture and slightly in shape:
http://www.***************/hosted/Selena_greensheet/1/images/SelenaSpice13.jpg
Some asses, even though they aren't perfect by themselves, become incredible when placed with a beautiful girl:
http://www.gyrls.com/upload/show.ph...928532-0000&PA=1172402&image=bubbles_010x.jpg
these three show an interesting array, and the girl on the far right is flawless(lexi belle):
http://content.beautyisdivine.com/hosted/three_sisters/source/15.html
the full set:
http://content.beautyisdivine.com/hosted/three_sisters/index.html
Similar threads
- Locked
