Watergate 2.0 in Progress

[sean miguel]

And like the Clinton-Lewinski scandal this is "just about sex." Candidate Trump paid hush money to a pornstar and bought the rights to the story of a former playmate, the supposed crime being he didn't announce it as a campaign expenditure. But of course Clinton actually perjured himself.

IMPEACH FORTY FIVE!!!

 

[Jack Davenport]

Trump did not break any laws and even if his payments were illegal which they’re not it is not analogous to with Watergate or Clinton-Lewinsky. A president can only be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors committed while in office. End of story.

 

[sean miguel]

So we went from Russian collusion to the National Enquirer.

Sessions and Rosenstein are fucking gone.

 

[Supafly]

Animus, george, bc - you can stop posting in here. You are so deep in the Trump con, you are pretty much blind by choice.

 

[xfire]

Animus, george, bc - you can stop posting in here. You are so deep in the Trump con, you are pretty much blind by choice.

I don't know what everyone you've mentioned have been posting, probably mostly shit posts about me, but yeah, you're on the money, anyone sticking with Trump really should take a nice long sabbatical at a local sanitarium.

 

[Supafly]

:stir:

 

[Supafly]

Oh, yeah

 

[Jack Davenport]

#InProgress *lol*

 

[Supafly]

His main bookeeper since the seventies has taken a deal. Ah, happy days are near!

 

[Jack Davenport]

His main bookeeper since the seventies has taken a deal. Ah, happy days are near!

Even if they committed a crime, you can’t impeach or remove a president for things they did BEFORE they were elected, genius.

So hold up on those happy days, Chachi.

Edit: I just watched a portion of that idiot Cenk Uygur say “ If they give you immunity, you have committed a crime” You mean like Hillary Clinton aide Cheryl Mills?

TYT is nothing bout a pep rally for left wing nuts. This piece proves it. He is getting rich stroking libtards daily.

 

[georges]

Also how can the FBI (Comey's FBI back then) be trusted if less than 1% of Weiner's Laptop emails were read ??
http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/24/emails-weiner-fbi-clinton/

TRUMP TWEETS ABOUT EXPLOSIVE CLINTON EMAIL STORY, WARNS HE ‘MAY HAVE TO GET INVOLVED’
http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/25/trump-clinton-emails-get-involved/

TRUMP GOES AFTER ‘FAKE NEWS MEDIA’ OVER ‘PHONY’ TRUMP TOWER STORY
http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/25/trump-phony-trump-tower/

RUDY GIULIANI TELLS MUELLER WHEN TRUMP TEAM WILL ‘ADMIT’ HE WAS FAIR
http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/25/r...eller-when-trump-team-will-admit-he-was-fair/

It is not by creating BS fabricated charges than you can impeach someone and with crooked people and people belonging to the deep state, I don't see any transparency nor even integrity because all the people whether it be Comey, Rosenstein, Mueller and perhaps even Sessions are definitely part of the deep state. Their role was and is to impeach the president. Question is do people trust a highly biased and corrupt justice system filled with scummy and despicable individiuals which were and still are all obama devotees and former Obama personnel? I don't think so unless they are stupid and can't reason logically by their own.
Let's not forget and let me remember you very clearly that the Steele dossier was a creation from the Obama administration, I will repeat it again and again for those who have short memory
http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/21/obamas-state-department-had-early-role-in-probe/

 

[georges]

And last thing which is important DOJ SOP indicts Pro-Trump office holders after primary, before general election
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/d...&ff_campaign=manualpost&ff_content=2018-08-25.
First against Chris Collins, now Duncan Hunter and let's not forget that also charges were brought against Joe Arpaio before in 2016. Yes they weren't Obama muppets, so the democrats and the crooked DOJ took whatever biased angle it was to incriminate some bs criminals charges. Is that the kind of biased and unfair justice we can expect from liberals/democrats? Yes all this are political hit jobs done by the DOJ which was supposed to stay neutral but which isn't.

 

[pool_hustler]

let's not forget that also charges were brought against Joe Arpaio before in 2016.

Well duh, the fuckwad was guilty of criminal contempt of court.

But then you "law and order" righties really don't give a shit about such things anymore so long as the perpetrators are on your side.

Just look at all the tears being shed for convicted felon Manafort.

 

[georges]

Well duh, the fuckwad was guilty of criminal contempt of court.

But then you "law and order" righties really don't give a shit about such things anymore so long as the perpetrators are on your side.

Just look at all the tears being shed for convicted felon Manafort.

We have seen the scare crow and low level tactics from the Obama devotees with the Steele dossier, enough for us never to trust a bunch of unpatriotic and rotten sell outs as well as corrupted and greedy leftists bureaucrats to the core like them.
I will have no tears when more Obama devotees will be framed and prosecuted in court for their illegal tactics against the president.

 

[Supafly]

find it admirable how well you keep up, now Trump's main bookie has made his deal with the judge.

He can provide deep information about all the shady to downright criminal deals Trump has made for ~40 years.

I can't even troll you any more, this is just too harsh

 

[georges]

find it admirable how well you keep up, now Trump's main bookie has made his deal with the judge.

He can provide deep information about all the shady to downright criminal deals Trump has made for ~40 years.

I can't even troll you any more, this is just too harsh

I know that the corrupt and low levels libs offered money so that he would return his vest, so who is the one corrupting and bribing others in order to impeachTrump? Democrats and more especially the left over rotten,biased and crooked elements from the Obama administration and the Clinton muppets. We will see how harsh will it be when Democrats will lose the mid terms like they lost the presidential election. 8 years of Obama's presidency have given nothing positive to the country. But the Democrats couldn't digest the loss of Hillary the fucking swine, so they had to find a scapegoat and used as usual per their no boundaries and no moral rules more precisely scarecrow and twisted tactics to oust and impeach Trump. I don't think that people with a conscience, sanity and a brain will vote for Ellison, Schumer, Pelosi, Waters and Warren which are fucked up obstructionnists, idiots and brainless morons.

 

[xfire]

I can't even troll you any more, this is just too harsh

If you bother to read any of the many links georges posts, you will realize he's working hard so you don't have to.

 

[georges]

If you bother to read any of the many links georges posts, you will realize he's working hard so you don't have to.

As much as Supa posts the vids from Trevor Noah and news vids from CNN and MSNBC news outlets, he is trying hard to pass half truths from Obama and Clinton devoted medias channels for the truth. Mainstream medias have shown how much bias they had against Trump and what kind of credibility they had which is an absolute zero.

 

[xfire]

As much as Supa posts the vids from Trevor Noah and news vids from CNN and MSNBC news outlets, he is trying hard to pass half truths from Obama and Clinton devoted medias channels for the truth. Mainstream medias have shown how much bias they had against Trump and what kind of credibility they had which is an absolute zero.

I read fast, consequently, I end up reading more of your links than I ignore (woe is me). More often than not; a) the headlines don't reflect the content, b) the article ends up contradicting itself, and/or c) the article completely refutes the point it was trying to make. Not an insult or attack, just an empirical observation.

 

[georges]

I read fast, consequently, I end up reading more of your links than I ignore (woe is me). More often than not; a) the headlines don't reflect the content, b) the article ends up contradicting itself, and/or c) the article completely refutes the point it was trying to make. Not an insult or attack, just an empirical observation.

I have seen how much are biased the videos supa posts , enough for me to see the bias in them. Just an empirical observation from my side too. The world would be too boring if we agreed on everything.