• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Watergate 2.0 in Progress

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Manafort indictment is just the tip of [NOBABE]the iceberg[/NOBABE] on the Trump Titanic, most corrupt administration in U.S. history, Nixon would be so proud. Financial crimes, yeah, it takes a tiny dick to be that fucking worried about money.
 
Yep just the tip of the [NOBABE]iceberg[/NOBABE] .
It’s not going to end the way you hope.

$10,000
 
Manafort indictment is just the tip of [NOBABE]the iceberg[/NOBABE] on the Trump Titanic, most corrupt administration in U.S. history, Nixon would be so proud. Financial crimes, yeah, it takes a tiny dick to be that fucking worried about money.

Care to list all of the credible claims of Trump administration corruption that make it the most corrupt administration in history?

Even better, name one. No wonder your sister hates you.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Yep just the tip of the [NOBABE]iceberg[/NOBABE] . It’s not going to end the way you hope. $10,000

Care to list all of the credible claims of Trump administration corruption that make it the most corrupt administration in history? Even better, name one. No wonder your sister hates you.

$10,000, that's cute. I don't have a sister, and Mueller's got the list, just wait.
 
$10,000, that's cute. I don't have a sister, and Mueller's got the list, just wait.

How much longer do we have to wait for the evidence? Manafort was indicted for activity outside of the Trump campaign. You don’t have a sister eh? That’s not what you said a while back and that you two were political enemies.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
How much longer do we have to wait for the evidence? Manafort was indicted for activity outside of the Trump campaign. You don’t have a sister eh? That’s not what you said a while back and that you two were political enemies.

I don't know, how long did the Benghazi investigation take?

I might have said I have a sister a while back, what of it? You trying to make shit personal up in here?
 
Manafort indictment is just the tip of [NOBABE]the iceberg[/NOBABE] on the Trump Titanic, most corrupt administration in U.S. history, Nixon would be so proud. Financial crimes, yeah, it takes a tiny dick to be that fucking worried about money.

Forget Manafort, George Papadopoulos Guilty Plea Should Have Team Trump Shaking in Their Boots

Much of the talk this morning has been about the indictment of former Donald Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and his associate Rick Gates for alleged conspiracy and money laundering. While the charges don’t have anything to do with President Trump or his campaign, conventional wisdom/speculation says that the charges could be geared towards cutting a deal whereby Manafort would end up cooperating with Special Counsel Robert Mueller‘s office by coming providing them with relevant information about the campaign. While that may be the case, another former campaign member looks to be far more perilous for Trump right now.

Foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to making false statements during a January 27, 2017 interview with the FBI. The topic? His communications with a professor who had ties to the Russian government and who discussed “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. According to a court document signed by Papadopoulos, he was in communication with the professor after assuming his role within the Trump campaign, and met with him in London to discuss the supposed dirt on Clinton and a connection in the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The 14-page statement of offense paints a clear picture of alleged ties between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. It points to evidence that this individual, in his capacity as a member of the Trump campaign, had repeated contacts with Russian nationals with the purpose of soliciting “dirt” on Hillary Clinton.

Furthermore, it explains how the Russians attempted to get Trump to travel to Russia in order to have an “off the record” meeting with Russian officials. Most importantly, the statement says that a “Campaign Supervisor” told Papadopoulos, “‘I would encourage you’ and another foreign policy advisor to the Campaign to ‘make the trip, if it is feasible.'”

Now, the feds made Papadopoulos an offer where he won’t face prosecution for anything else related to this. As a result, he’s free to talk all he wants. As LawNewz founder Dan Abrams pointed out as soon as the plea was announced:

Since then, we learned that he is cooperating. So now you have a former Trump campaign adviser who has admitted to colluding with Russian actors who he believed were tied to the Russian government, and discussing these efforts with Trump campaign officials, including a so-called “High-Ranking Campaign Official” and a “Campaign Supervisor.” If the FBI didn’t know the identity of that high-ranking official yet, there’s a real good chance Papadopoulos has told them now that he has a deal.

The Manafort indictment is making waves because he was at the top of the campaign, but the charges against him really do have nothing to do with the campaign. Papadopoulos, however, admitted that he himself was talking to the Russians and telling senior campaign staff about his activities.

So why is this so important?

We already knew that Donald Trump Jr. met with a Russian attorney with the belief that he could get dirt on Clinton, and while that might have been troubling, there isn’t anything illegal about the meeting (that we know of yet). So how is this different?

For starters, Trump Jr. discussed non-specific negative information about Hillary Clinton, and reports about his meeting with the Russian lawyer said that he didn’t even get any information. Without any knowledge about what the supposed dirt was, it’s hard to say that it was a thing “of value” that would qualify as an illegal “contribution” from a foreign national under campaign finance law. Papadopoulos’ statement, on the other hand, refers to “thousands of emails” of Hillary Clinton. Such a large volume of data–that would have to have been procured with significant resources–would likely qualify as a contribution if the Russians gave them to the campaign, or if the campaign even asked for them.

Next, you have the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which the campaign may have violated if they worked with Russia to obtain or release hacked emails. Now, the statement indicates that the Russians claimed to already have the emails. If, however, the emails in question included the Democratic National Committee emails or those belonging to Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, and the Trump campaign was involved in coordinating their release, that could be a problem, according to Lawfare Blog.

On top of this, of course, is that there could be tons of information that we’re still not aware of. Even though the information in Papadopoulos’ statement didn’t show that the Trump campaign did anything illegal per se, there are some dangerous signs, and his deal could lead to him giving up information about other activities that were illegal.

It remains to be seen whether the Trump campaign broke the law by colluding with Russia, but if they did, this is the path that will lead to that conclusion.
https://lawnewz.com/high-profile/fo...hould-have-team-trump-shaking-in-their-boots/
 
I don't know, how long did the Benghazi investigation take?

I might have said I have a sister a while back, what of it? You trying to make shit personal up in here?

There was some actual hard evidence in the Benghazi investigation.
Yeah, you did say you had a sister. Why would you make that up?
I only commented on a statement you made earlier.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
There was some actual hard evidence in the Benghazi investigation.

Yeah, you did say you had a sister. Why would you make that up? I only commented on a statement you made earlier.

There is actual hard evidence in the Russia/Trump investigation or Trump would already have been cleared. Reap it.

Regardless of whether or not I made a statement about having a sister, it has zero relevance and is yet another example of your consistent pattern of personal attacks. Not that anyone finds it surprising.
 
There is actual hard evidence in the Russia/Trump investigation or Trump would already have been cleared. Reap it.

Or there is no actual hard evidence in the Russia/Trump investigation or Trump would already have been charged. Using your same logic.
 
There is actual hard evidence in the Russia/Trump investigation or Trump would already have been cleared. Reap it.

Regardless of whether or not I made a statement about having a sister, it has zero relevance and is yet another example of your consistent pattern of personal attacks. Not that anyone finds it surprising.
How in the hell is repeating what you stated on the board a “ personal attack”?
If you had allies willing to assist you in your vengeful dirty work, after witnessing your petty display they are probably dropping like flies.
 
Top