Ukraine will join NATO.
Israeli air strikes continued after the deal was announced on Wednesday. At least 12 people were killed in Gaza City, where a doctor told the BBC staff "did not rest for one minute" during the "bloody night".
Strikes were carried out on 50 targets in Gaza since the deal's announcement, the Israel Defense Forces and the Israeli Security Agency said in a statement.
It would be great if it held. No one I know that is pro Israel, wants to see war continue.Can we all agree that it would be nice if the ceasefire holds as planned?
Yes, it would very nice. How have the prior ceasefires held up?Can we all agree that it would be nice if the ceasefire holds as planned?
I could be wrong, but are they not cheering for Palestine, not Hamas? Or just the ceasefire in general? I didn't hear any "Alu Akbars", just general cheering.Yes, it would very nice. How have the prior ceasefires held up?
The part which is difficult to comprehend is Hamas being cheered by locals.
Who exactly is footing the bill for that. Pottery Barn rules say "You Break it, you pay for it", but somehow I don't think isreal is getting their chequebooks out.There is a ceasefire now, but their homes and lives were completely destroyed over the past year. The war displaced 90% of the residents and destroyed two-thirds of Gazan structures. Rebuilding will be a nightmare.
I noted some articles specifically referenced “Alu Akbar,” but here is a Reuters one noting the cheering of the crowds.I could be wrong, but are they not cheering for Palestine, not Hamas? Or just the ceasefire in general? I didn't hear any "Alu Akbars", just general cheering.
I would think that Hamas’s supporters would be lining up to rebuild Gaza. Iran should be front and center for providing funding. By invading Israel, Hamas is the proximate cause of the destruction.Who exactly is footing the bill for that. Pottery Barn rules say "You Break it, you pay for it", but somehow I don't think isreal is getting their chequebooks out.
If isreal was smart (LOL), they would be footing the bill and building up Gaza to 1st world standards. That is how you win over people after a war.I would think that Hamas’s supporters would be lining up to rebuild Gaza. Iran should be front and center for providing funding. By invading Israel, Hamas is the proximate cause of the destruction.
Rebuilding and rebombing would be quite awkward.All this is of course, hypothetical. Because isreal has no intent on funding the rebuilding efforts.
Which raises the question: Why do you think the US succeeded in rebuilding Japan/Germany (and to a degree, Iraq), while not so much in Afghanistan?Rebuilding and rebombing would be quite awkward.
A Marshall Plan for Gaza would probably work as well as the US efforts at rebuilding Afghanistan. I do not see how this works out. Gaza will be one large refugee camp for a long time. The human toll will be overwhelming.
According to the 2023 V-Dem Democracy indices Iraq was the third most electoral democratic country in the Middle East.[78]
The world was ready to be done fighting in the aftermath of WW2 while religious zealots are a difficult breed to convert.Which raises the question: Why do you think the US succeeded in rebuilding Japan/Germany (and to a degree, Iraq), while not so much in Afghanistan?
Geographically it is closer, but Hamas is more similar to the Taliban than Hussein’s Ba’ath party. Religion seems to be a more difficult opponent than nationalism.And on that note, Iraq is the closest to Gaza (at least, physically), and it's been relatively successful.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq#Government_and_politics
Didn't he extend that deadline to "year one" instead of "day one"? LOLOn another note, are we all enjoying the end of the Urkraine special military operation? Or did Trump not deliver on his promise to end it on Day one?
He was going to do it before taking office too.Didn't he extend that deadline to "year one" instead of "day one"? LOL
...
A suggestion by President Trump to “clean out” the Gaza Strip and ask Egypt and Jordan to take in more Palestinians raised new questions on Sunday about United States policy toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and two of its most important allies in the Middle East.
Mr. Trump’s comments appeared to echo the wishes of the Israeli far right that Palestinians be encouraged to leave Gaza — an idea that goes to the heart of Palestinian fears that they will be driven from their remaining homelands.
“You’re talking about probably a million and a half people, and we just clean out that whole thing,” Mr. Trump said of Gaza on Saturday. “I don’t know. Something has to happen, but it’s literally a demolition site right now.”
Mr. Trump told reporters on Air Force One that he had spoken to King Abdullah II of Jordan about the issue, saying, “I said to him, ‘I’d love for you to take on more because I’m looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now, and it’s a mess.’” He added that he would also like Egypt to take in more Palestinians and that he would speak to the country’s president, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, about the issue.
He said that Palestinians could be in Jordan and Egypt “temporarily, or could be long-term.”
It was unclear from Mr. Trump’s comments if he was suggesting that all of the people in Gaza leave. The enclave has a population of about two million.
...