• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

True AMATEUR girls who have sex in PARTYHARDCORE !?

So, assuming that's the final part of PH60 released...place your bets!

What's next? Another decent, early Party Hardcore or one of the terrible recent Gone Crazy ones.
Am I right in noticing a theme? - one old, one new, one old, one new....
If the recent scheme holds, it'll be PHGC32.
 
You correct in guessing. The new multi-cam release is Party Hardcore Gone Crazy Vol 32.
A lot of action in this one driven by pornstars mainly that its almost DSO. The shining light is the return of the short haired blonde with the dreamcatcher neck tattoo with a great set of tits and ass that the original release couldn't seem to get any up close penetration footage of. She appeared in both 31 and 32 back to back and was fucked by several strippers and yet the footage could have been used in an R rated version as we have never saw her pussy or asshole. Hopefully there is better footage of her this time around.
 
Girl from time snap 1:47 witch a black dress and a tattoo on back ID or amateur?
https://************/videos/party-hardcore-vol-65-part-2-part-2.html
 
Wait what, there is a scheme of releasing :O How do you know this? Will PH 51 be released in the future ?
They seem to go from releasing a multi-cam of a Party Hardcore Gone Crazy Vol, and then a non- crazy Party Hardcore Vol, and then back to a Gone Crazy Vol, and so on. Recent multi-cam releases in the Gone Crazy Vol have been in the 30s Vol range and for the non-gone crazy range has been in the 40s, 50s, and 60s Vol range. So, by process of elimination from what's already been release, we can make a guess about which ones might be next. This only works providing they stick to what seems to be the current release scheme/order, Hopefully they will eventually release a multi-cam of PH 51 and 54, as flydip was wondering. I hope that they release multi-cam of all the parties, even the really old ones.
 
the quality is low, not my fault ... try to find the date

2.jpg

3.jpg

1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Top