LOL on the editor. I think whoever it is has a jobs program with Tainster/Sinx to help channel their OCD or something. THEY MUST CUT THE VIDEO. It was many pages back but I noticed and posted on a re-release of a DSO party multi-cam reissue (i.e. already released then faked as new I think) that the editor couldn't let it out before they cut a few seconds of a girl almost slipping and falling, even though that 10 seconds had been out for years and was fun. If you look at the really old DSO's they released (actual new multicam content) there are generally more then 3 camera's but they seem to edit them to 3 cams, probably partially just due to stops and moving camera recording feet / the floor etc. In PHGC 11 the recent multicam they edit 10-15 seconds of the amateur when her friend come over right before she has sex for some inexplicable, only Sinx editor knows reason. It's just ridiculous, but sort of expected with Sinx that they do stuff like this.
PH 54 was really good, waiting for that and 16, 49 and of course a few others. Hopefully they skip PHGC for awhile.
bump , who knows?Who is this brunette in black dress from vol 78?
Two more uploads for you.
Party Hardcore Gone Crazy 30
https://xhamster.com/videos/party-hardcore-gone-crazy-30-amateur-edit-14961238
Party Hardcore 58 (Multicam edit part 1)
https://xhamster.com/videos/party-hardcore-58-part-1-multicam-edit-xh5udeP
@Zipomatic Does anyone know the story with the pixelated bj at about 3:20 of PHGC30? It looks like a plant as she seems to have the wristband on her left.
I've seen this party from other sources and this scene isn't pixellated.@Zipomatic Does anyone know the story with the pixelated bj at about 3:20 of PHGC30? It looks like a plant as she seems to have the wristband on her left.
I've seen this party from other sources and this scene isn't pixellated.
@Zipomatic Does anyone know the story with the pixelated bj at about 3:20 of PHGC30? It looks like a plant as she seems to have the wristband on her left.
I did this edit a loooong time ago, and I seem to remember messing around with my editing tools. Since a plant was on screen, I attempted to "blur" her out, so only the amateur girl was visible. At the time I thought I was being clever, but later realised that all I did was make it look like something was happening that should not be.
Sorry for the confusion guys, there was nothing to see there.
Well, he tried. They should show more when they get turned down, it legitimises their successes.Looks like they're releasing multi cams of PH 58 (early 2011 I think). Some nice babes in there, including the busty chick with coloured hair who supposedly worked at the place as a bartender or something. Hope we see more of her.
Two more uploads for you.
Party Hardcore Gone Crazy 30
https://xhamster.com/videos/party-hardcore-gone-crazy-30-amateur-edit-14961238
Party Hardcore 58 (Multicam edit part 1)
https://xhamster.com/videos/party-hardcore-58-part-1-multicam-edit-xh5udeP
Yes, totally agree, love to see when they fail. In this instance I think it was the wrong guy, girl was so horny I am sure Dennis would have fucked her or Neo would just have raped her. Speaking of which at 22min in part 2 cam 1, Neo tries to get his hand down a girls pants, she clearly says no, but he doesn't care and puts it down there for a few seconds anyways. Such a creep.
A creep, maybe. But you have to give respect to a guy who can get his shithole licked by straight amateur girls in the middle of a party
I'm sure you don't mean that literally of course, but do you have examples for scenes where his behaviour towards amateur girls kinda looked in a way that makes you say a thing like that?or Neo would just have raped her
Haha, I am not complaining, the amount of entertainment his creepy behavior has provided throughout the years is legendary!
Good point....but you just made half the dicks on this thread go limp.A creep, maybe. But you have to give respect to a guy who can get his shithole licked by straight amateur girls in the middle of a party
We would like to make it clear that you can still post new ID request threads, you just have to click through to the new BETA sections at the top of the page.
Posting fresh queries in the "old" sections has been disabled for the duration of this trial. Some people seem to think they can't post threads at all, which is not the case.
If the experiment is a success, you won't need to keep clicking into it because all threads will then become one section, so don't use what is a minor inconvenience for now as a reason not to like it because it won't always be this way!
For more info, please click here.
Thank you!