True AMATEUR girls who have sex in PARTYHARDCORE !?
- Thread starter jasar
- Start date
I will definitely look at the source you gave. Such a hot woman shame we can't see any more scenes of her.
I'm looking for information about This 2 girls:
Busty blonde from first part od clip:
https://pl.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph5c9af29d8b758
Short haired brunette
https://fr.xvideos.com/video52804561/belle_brune_de_partyhardcore
Big Thanks
Busty blonde from first part od clip:
https://pl.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph5c9af29d8b758
Short haired brunette
https://fr.xvideos.com/video52804561/belle_brune_de_partyhardcore
Big Thanks
Yeah, Nice party. But i don't think much interesting footage was missing from the regular edit. It does have 2 of the skankiest amateurs doing hardcore in it. Can't find another word for them than just fat skanks. You'll know when you see them and agree...lol!
Not sure who that is, but yes the party is a pretty strong one, so hope there is some interesting extra footage.
google for public-gazebo-cock-gobbler. blowjob
I did not find anything else harder from this girl and I doubt that someone got the name sometime...
She appears in WDgirls bonusmay (pissing) but no hardcore that I know...
(she has her own threat in this board "partyhardcore_girl"
any update
It's labelled cam 4 but there's a lot of hard cuts imo. Main edit to probably come tomorrow.
It's not the same video as the original main edit form 2011, but it kinda is, with the scenes just cobbled together a little differently. Kind of a scam if you ask me.
I meant the blonde girl on the right in this one (this is from ph50):
https://1062992722.rsc.cdn77.org/r5...eview/1621/510x290/deals-importdSE1KT1894.jpg
Are you sure she's in this? From the few previews I can see, she's not. It's just so annoying that they don't put the number of the parties anymore. Those stupid titles are just useless. And it seems they keep on releasing the most boring old parties.
Hair is coloured red, but yeah I'm sure. E.g. starting at 6:25 in this (beware: ads/popups):
https://fap18.net/video-mobile/5217066/party-hardcore-vol-58-part-2-part-3
I agree that that the video titles on sinx.com are stupid. Seems almost like a bug rather than a deliberate crippling of the site, but they just don't care enough to fix it, lol.
Last edited:
Party Hardcore is back in the club with a different amateur CFNM sex celebration, and these chicks are wasting no time getting started!! Our main male stripper, a black dude having a body which melts the audience of screaming freaks, does exactly what he does best with revealing these ladies what a real man´s cock is about, along with his male bash stud partners are throughout the club showing these genuinely amateur chicks what a Party Hardcore sex party is all about!! There´s already plenty of dick sucking and women getting fucked across the point in this update, so put your ticket to the club and see how mad its gonna receive!! Party Hardcore!
title is from video description/preview first sentence...
title is from video description/preview first sentence...
Last edited:
It is always better to have 4 then 3 camera edits, but it would be even better to be unedited cuts, but they love to cut, I guess.
So, ph vol. 58 has 4 camera edits, but the first party which is chronologically before released on multicam is ph vol. 52, and that party only has 3 camera edits.
Now the question is how many edits will have ph between those two(53,54,55,56 and 57) . Maybe all the parties since they changed the studio (so from ph vol. 56) will have 4 edits, and those before only 3.
I would love every party to have 4 edits, especually ph vol. 54, since that's my favorite ph ever.
Yeah exactly. That's why I think it's a bug, because it totally doesn't make sense to do that intentionally, even even if you deliberately WANT to screw your users.
LOL on the editor. I think whoever it is has a jobs program with Tainster/Sinx to help channel their OCD or something. THEY MUST CUT THE VIDEO. It was many pages back but I noticed and posted on a re-release of a DSO party multi-cam reissue (i.e. already released then faked as new I think) that the editor couldn't let it out before they cut a few seconds of a girl almost slipping and falling, even though that 10 seconds had been out for years and was fun. If you look at the really old DSO's they released (actual new multicam content) there are generally more then 3 camera's but they seem to edit them to 3 cams, probably partially just due to stops and moving camera recording feet / the floor etc. In PHGC 11 the recent multicam they edit 10-15 seconds of the amateur when her friend come over right before she has sex for some inexplicable, only Sinx editor knows reason. It's just ridiculous, but sort of expected with Sinx that they do stuff like this.
PH 54 was really good, waiting for that and 16, 49 and of course a few others. Hopefully they skip PHGC for awhile.
