Top 5 Greatest Presidents

mcrocket said:
Well, it wouldn't be any President who ruled before Lincoln. I cannot respect a man who rules a nation that claims that all men are created equal and yet supports (and/or does not outlaw) slavery. And I am white. I can't imagine what black's think. So no Jefferson or Washington for me.
I don't presuppose to know all the President's. Or even most of them. But I guess my list would be;

1)Lincoln
2)FDR
3)JFK
4)Reagan - I mean he deliberately bankrupted the Soviet Union. It could have resulted in WW3; but instead it ended the Cold War. So I gotta give him credit for that.
5)Clinton - He didn't do very much that was all that great. He just made very few mistakes - as far as I am concerned.

hey mcrocket...if you dont know anything about presidents then dont put what you think. cause you say you wouldnt put any president before lincoln. well lincoln wasnt exactly the most influencial person the abolitionist movement. he and his family had owned slaves and he is quoted as saying that his main intention was not to free the slaves, but to keep the union today. he said that if he could have kept the union together and kept slaves....he would have. so there....you have to take into factor the time period. yes washington and jefferson did owns slaves, but they treated them very kindly and after jeffersons presidency he told his slaves that they were free at anytime...but none of them ever left (granted there were only 5 or 6)
 

McRocket

Banned
Knightley12 said:
hey mcrocket...if you dont know anything about presidents then dont put what you think. cause you say you wouldnt put any president before lincoln. well lincoln wasnt exactly the most influencial person the abolitionist movement. he and his family had owned slaves and he is quoted as saying that his main intention was not to free the slaves, but to keep the union today. he said that if he could have kept the union together and kept slaves....he would have. so there....you have to take into factor the time period. yes washington and jefferson did owns slaves, but they treated them very kindly and after jeffersons presidency he told his slaves that they were free at anytime...but none of them ever left (granted there were only 5 or 6)


One - I did not say I know nothing about the President's.

Two - I never said Lincoln was a nice guy. That was not the question. The question was who were the 'Top 5 greatest President's'. And under his administration, he abolished slavery. My understanding was that he actually wrote most if not all of the Emancipation Proclamation. He could have had sex with goats in his spare time, for all I care. That has nothing to do with the business of the nation.
All the President's before him chose not to abolish slavery. And I do not recall any of them ever seriously trying to. So maybe he owned slaves. And maybe he liked slavery. Whatever. The point is he was the one whose administration abolished it. And that is good enough for me.
It was a shrewd military move. But whatever. The slaves were free. And as far as I am concerned. Any nation that legalizes slavery does not deserve to be called a nation. And anyone that heads a 'country' that allows slavery and doesn't do their utmost to end it - is little better then the slave owners.
And that includes ALL the President's before Lincoln. No matter how 'nice' they were to their slaves.

What I am trying to say that The United States of America did not exist as a respected nation before the passing of the Emancipation Proclamation. So whomever led it is irrelavent to me.
And like I said. I am not black. I can only imagine what blacks think/thought of all this.

And BTW - I heard from many sources that Nixon was anti-semetic. But yet it was under his presidency that the massive American military airlift possibly saved Israel in 1973 during the Yom Kippur War. It does not matter what the President likes or dislikes. It is what actions he/she takes regardless of personal opinion. That is what makes a good President to me.
 
Last edited:

SovereignAxe

Closed Account
Knightley12 said:
borat, are you an idiot. you think G.W. is the 4th greatest president and G.H.W. is the 5th. they are both horrible, horrible presidents. i cant believe people support an idiot like Bush. did you know his IQ is only 91 and his dads is 98. you know what bill clintons is?......182, double Bush's.
ok, Clinton was a good president and I do believe he is a pretty smart guy but I refuse to believe he has an IQ of 182, that's like supergenius. genius is only 140. as for Bush being a 91...that might be a little low but I don't doubt it's far off.
 

McRocket

Banned
SovereignAxe said:
ok, Clinton was a good president and I do believe he is a pretty smart guy but I refuse to believe he has an IQ of 182, that's like supergenius. genius is only 140. as for Bush being a 91...that might be a little low but I don't doubt it's far off.


I agree. 182? That sounds a bit much. Let me see that IQ test please.
 
SovereignAxe said:
ok, Clinton was a good president and I do believe he is a pretty smart guy but I refuse to believe he has an IQ of 182, that's like supergenius. genius is only 140. as for Bush being a 91...that might be a little low but I don't doubt it's far off.
have you seen fahrenheit 911 ?
you should see it, your judgement against bush family will progress

Im too young to have an opinion on the before clinton president,
so my top 5 is :

1/ Clinton (cause the lewinsky affair :D )
2/ Mary Carey :thumbsup:
3/ Mickeal Moore
4/ Snoop Dogg
5/ Arnold Swarzeneger, it would be funny... but not so funny in fact :(
 

McRocket

Banned
9inch said:
have you seen fahrenheit 911 ?
you should see it, your judgement against bush family will progress

Im too young to have an opinion on the before clinton president,
so my top 5 is :

1/ Clinton (cause the lewinsky affair :D )
2/ Mary Carey :thumbsup:
3/ Mickeal Moore
4/ Snoop Dogg
5/ Arnold Swarzeneger, it would be funny... but not so funny in fact :(


I know you are joking around. But I wish everyone would take Michael Moore a little LESS seriously. He is not a pure documentary maker. He makes drama documentaries. I cannot speak about the last one. But there were scenes in his earlier movies (Roger and Me and Bowling for Combine) that were apparently staged - but made to look real. He may have some good points. But I do not like the way he deceives people by manufacturing the truth sometimes. Much of what he says is undoubtably true. But he would be more creditable as a journalist if he stopped manufacturing material sometimes - and then not telling us that it is fake.
 
yeah i agree with that. i think that michael moore did show some valid points, but he also just started to let his personal thoughts slide into his documentaries. yes, i dont like bush....but i also dont like michael moore that much either cause i personally dont think that he was doing that to show people "the truth" about Bush...i think he just wanted to make money and show his own personal thoughts. so yeah, some people need to stop taking michael moore as seriously as they do.
 
Washington
Teddy Roosevelt
Abraham Lincoln
John Adams
Andrew Jackson
 

jasonk282

Banned
Washington
Teddy Roosevelt
Abraham Lincoln
John Adams
Andrew Jackson

Thanks for taking a 3 year old thread back to live. Beward of the thread zombies.:eek:
 
If Iraq works out, then G. W. will be on that list, or should be, if it doesn't end well, then he will be one of the worst. It doesn't relly on if he does anything beyond being president from this time untill his run is over, he wont have to do anything and if it ends well than he will be looked on as a good president, if not then he will be looked down on as a horrible president.

What do you mean by "works out"? It's already an epic fail. If you mean by "works out" they are back tending to their own affairs with no terrorist footprint in their borders....it was that way before we went over there and caused a bunch of deaths and high ass gas prices. The best we can hope for is that Iran moderates since we have inadvertently aligned Iraq's leadership with the extremists in Iran. I wouldn't even rate GWB as a bone head....his head is just marrow.

If Iraq works out? Iraq can't work out because it was a mistake from the beginning. I want one possible scenerio of how Iraq will "work out". Bush will go down as one of the most small-minded, small-hearted presidents ever, or at least he should. The U.S. has already killed over 10,000 Iraqi civilians, we lost this battle a long time ago. Because I am sure the Iraqis are so grateful to Bush for freeing them as he blows up their family members and friends.

Thank you.:hatsoff:

Lets see, I'd have to say

1. Theodore Roosevelt
2. FDR
3. George Washington
4. Abraham Lincoln
5. Harry S. Truman

:thumbsup:..I would shuffle a couple you have listed there but TR is definitely my no. 1 and virtually is the only president who's status rises to legendary IMO.
 

jasonk282

Banned
What do you mean by "works out"? It's already an epic fail. If you mean by "works out" they are back tending to their own affairs with no terrorist footprint in their borders....it was that way before we went over there and caused a bunch of deaths and high ass gas prices. The best we can hope for is that Iran moderates since we have inadvertently aligned Iraq's leadership with the extremists in Iran. I wouldn't even rate GWB as a bone head....his head is just marrow.
HM the post by P the D was made in feb 2005 before the November election.







:thumbsup:..I would shuffle a couple you have listed there but TR is definitely my no. 1 and virtually is the only president who's status rises to legendary IMO.

TR would not be in my top 40, he is the worst republican these is Progressive.:2 cents:
 
What do you mean by "works out"? It's already an epic fail. If you mean by "works out" they are back tending to their own affairs with no terrorist footprint in their borders....it was that way before we went over there and caused a bunch of deaths and high ass gas prices. The best we can hope for is that Iran moderates since we have inadvertently aligned Iraq's leadership with the extremists in Iran. I wouldn't even rate GWB as a bone head....his head is just marrow.

Erm . . . the guy hasn't posted in over two years (I checked ;)). Somehow I don't think he's going to reply. :dunno:
 
The democracy in Iraq inspires the rest of the Middle East to fight against the terrorist regimes so that terrorism is kept under control and the world is relatively safe from it. Iraq just had its first election, so I'd say they're working out just fine.

What does democracy and fighting terrorism have to do with one another??? Zip...The Saudis don't have a democracy and they fight terrorism nor did the Pakistanis.

Iraq was no hub of terrorism nor sanctuary for terrorists....please tell us what effect Iraq having a "democracy" will have on fighting terrorism? I submit no influence over it other than dodging those there now trying to blow up their cities.

You don't need a democracy to fight against people trying to blow shit up in your country.

If the claim is that Saddam is no longer paying the families of Palestinian suicide bombers....Uh, we needed to invade a country, kill up a bunch of people, spend a ton of money and multiply the number of terrorist to stop that??? Never mind the fact that if he was...Israel actually did bomb his country unprovoked.

Further there has been a "democracy" on Iraq's northern border since the '20s. If the theory were true where's the fruit of it with Turkey???

Iraq had no out-facing terrorists until we invaded....and they will have terrorists for the foreseeable now that we have.

We don't need to wait and see.....it was an epic fail.
 

jasonk282

Banned
What does democracy and fighting terrorism have to do with one another??? Zip...The Saudis don't have a democracy and they fight terrorism nor did the Pakistanis.

Iraq was no hub of terrorism nor sanctuary for terrorists....please tell us what effect Iraq having a "democracy" will have on fighting terrorism? I submit no influence over it other than dodging those there now trying to blow up their cities.

You don't need a democracy to fight against people trying to blow shit up in your country.

If the claim is that Saddam is no longer paying the families of Palestinian suicide bombers....Uh, we needed to invade a country, kill up a bunch of people, spend a ton of money and multiply the number of terrorist to stop that??? Never mind the fact that if he was...Israel actually did bomb his country unprovoked.

Further there has been a "democracy" on Iraq's northern border since the '20s. If the theory was true where's the fruit of it with Turkey???

Iraq had no out-facing terrorists until we invaded....and they will have terrorists for the foreseeable now that we have.

We don't need to wait and see.....it was an epic fail.

Once again HM your responding to a post that was made 2-25-2005.
 
HM the post by P the D was made in feb 2005 before the November election.
Thanks but the ideology behind the policy is still what drives people to believe there is still some history to be made in Iraq. The policy was a failure for a variety of reason starting with the variety of phony premises.


TR would not be in my top 40, he is the worst republican these is Progressive.:2 cents:

If that's your lone bone to pick with TR you should know that Republicans were much more akin to progressivism than conservatism in that day. The modern day Republican is not the party of Lincoln (no matter how much like to wear that sash...it's obviously not true).

TR
Earned a Nobel Peace Prize for negotiation and end to Russian-Japanese (Russo-Japanese) war.
Completed the Panama Canal.
Authored the "Square Deal" which sought to protect the environment from developmental encroachment, consumers from anti-trust practices of businesses and businesses from some organized labors extremism, etc.:2 cents:
First Prez to ride in a sub, automobile and airplane
 

jasonk282

Banned
Thanks but the ideology behind the policy is still what drives people to believe there is still some history to be made in Iraq. The policy was a failure for a variety of reason starting with the variety of phony premises.




If that's your lone bone to pick with TR you should know that Republicans were much more akin to progressivism than conservatism in that day. The modern day Republican is not the party of Lincoln (no matter how much like to wear that sash...it's obviously not true).

TR
Earned a Nobel Peace Prize for negotiation and end to Russian-Japanese (Russo-Japanese) war.
Completed the Panama Canal.
Authored the "Square Deal" which sought to protect the environment from developmental encroachment, consumers from anti-trust practices of businesses and businesses from some organized labors extremism, etc.:2 cents:
First Prez to ride in a sub, automobile and airplane
I know all this, repubs should be going after people like Jefferson or Reagan rather than TR and Lincoln

1. George Washington, started the whole thing
2. Thomas Jefferson, doubled the size of America, Lewis and Clark
3. Andrew Jackson, opposed a national bank
4. Lincoln, perserved the Union
5. Ronald Reagan, helped bring an end to the cold war.
 
Top