jitna
Eternally hoping to lick Briana
Hmm. You want me to come up with something? That sounds like it would require a significant amount of brainpower and I'm kinda sick today.
if it were me, id probably talk about her butt
The Official Harley Spencer Discussion Thread! (AMA)
- Thread starter Harley Spencer
- Start date
if it were me, id probably talk about her butt
As spectacular and thought provoking as her but may be I'm not sure if I'm capable of having an intellectual conversation about it.
Observe...
So Harley, about your butt, um... ... ... :drool2: ...
See? Doesn't work too well. :dunno:
jitna
Eternally hoping to lick Briana
ok, well, then how about finding sexy bikini's that Harley should try on. or the more fun, crazy bikinis that Harley should try on. such as http://www.buzzfeed.com/akdobbins/bacon-bikini-nsfw
Last edited:
Well, this one isn't crazy, but I think it looks nice, and would probably look great on her. :dunno:
jitna
Eternally hoping to lick Briana
im thinking the blue one might be better on her
Harley Spencer
Official Checked Star Member
Nah I like the black one better. I'm not sure if I'd wear it for anything but shooting, but I might. It's definitely interesting and unique, something you don't normally see girls wearing.
Harley Spencer
Official Checked Star Member
The fringe is interesting. Plus I like the scrunch bottom.
The fringe is what I like about it, but I didn't know it had a scrunch bottom. Personally I don't like the new scrunch bottom fad for bikinis because I think it makes it look like you have a saggy bum, or rather it looks like there's too much material. I like my bikini bottoms to be string ties and be nice and flat in the back since I have a pretty small ass but wide hips, so I need flexibility with the ties so I can adjust it accordingly and nice tightness (i.e. less material) around the bum so that it isn't baggy.
Harley Spencer
Official Checked Star Member
I just went back and looked at the link. It wouldn't fit me because it only comes in sizes medium and large. The top would fit but the bottom wouldn't. I usually have to buy my bikinis in store so that I can get a size medium top and size small bottom. Size small top doesn't usually fit, it ends up sliding up my chest and exposing the bottom half of my breasts. Size medium bottom is good around my hips but way too big on my butt. Wah.
Wah.
jitna
Eternally hoping to lick Briana
I just went back and looked at the link. It wouldn't fit me because it only comes in sizes medium and large. The top would fit but the bottom wouldn't. I usually have to buy my bikinis in store so that I can get a size medium top and size small bottom. Size small top doesn't usually fit, it ends up sliding up my chest and exposing the bottom half of my breasts. Size medium bottom is good around my hips but way too big on my butt.
sounds to me like you should just wear the top, what with you not liking the style of it and it not fitting you. i think we'd all be fine if you left the bottom off
Shouldn't, it's supposed to scrunch in. Basically hug the fanny (uh... North American fanny, not UK fanny, just to be clear
).I vehemently disagree with that statement. Your ass is immaculate.
Hmm, checked a few of the links at the bottom to similar fringe bikinis by Cloris Murphy and apparently none come in small. How odd.
Of course if she decided to shoot on a beach that could cause substantial legal issues, up to and including an arrest.
Though I guess she could wear it with jeans. Mmmm... jeans. :drool2:
jitna
Eternally hoping to lick Briana
agreed
Harley getting arrested would be bad. so you can you go bottomless while youre inside. that should be fine, right?
Hey, I just thought of something I can be annoying about!
Do you like the Terminator sequels? Well, let me take a moment to point out a giant plot hole in there. It is clearly established in the first film (and followed up with in the sequels) that they can't send weapons back because nothing can travel back in time unless it's coated in living flesh. So... how did any of the liquid metal terminators go back? They may look like flesh, but that's an illusion. They're actually just metal, so they can't actually have gone back at all. And now whenever you watch T2 or any of the other sequels you will now remember that giant plot hole and know that even within the narrative none of them could ever have happened.
Oh... and if they can send a terminator back in time because it's a machine coated in flesh... why the fuck don't they just coat a laser gun in skin? BAM! Problem solved.
Do you like the Terminator sequels? Well, let me take a moment to point out a giant plot hole in there. It is clearly established in the first film (and followed up with in the sequels) that they can't send weapons back because nothing can travel back in time unless it's coated in living flesh. So... how did any of the liquid metal terminators go back? They may look like flesh, but that's an illusion. They're actually just metal, so they can't actually have gone back at all. And now whenever you watch T2 or any of the other sequels you will now remember that giant plot hole and know that even within the narrative none of them could ever have happened.
Oh... and if they can send a terminator back in time because it's a machine coated in flesh... why the fuck don't they just coat a laser gun in skin? BAM! Problem solved.
ApolloBalboa
Was King of the Board for a Day
Hey, I just thought of something I can be annoying about!
Do you like the Terminator sequels? Well, let me take a moment to point out a giant plot hole in there. It is clearly established in the first film (and followed up with in the sequels) that they can't send weapons back because nothing can travel back in time unless it's coated in living flesh. So... how did any of the liquid metal terminators go back? They may look like flesh, but that's an illusion. They're actually just metal, so they can't actually have gone back at all. And now whenever you watch T2 or any of the other sequels you will now remember that giant plot hole and know that even within the narrative none of them could ever have happened.
Oh... and if they can send a terminator back in time because it's a machine coated in flesh... why the fuck don't they just coat a laser gun in skin? BAM! Problem solved.
Becuase James Cameron said so.
This is just one of those things (of several) that make no sense despite all the "suspension of disbelief".
How does liquid metal even work? It has no inner mechanisms. At least the T-X in T3 made some sense as the liquid metal was just its skin and not its entire body.
For an "in-universe" answer, I suppose the T-1000 could mimic skin so closely that it "fooled" the time displacement equipment into thinking it was transporting something organic, or it could just be that Reese was wrong.
Really this is another plot hole in itself- why would the machines build a device that could only transport organic living objects?
Of course the "real" answer was so that Reese (or the Terminator) couldn't bring back futuristic weapons.
I could tailor make you some pants. Seriously.
However, I'm a bit handsy while I measure you. It's the price you pay.
However, I'm a bit handsy while I measure you. It's the price you pay.
Pretty sure it's all mechanisms... nanotechnology.
However it's not something done by design. It's not something that can be "fooled". It's supposedly an issue of unexplained quantum mechanics.
Then where are the guns?
Really, it's just sloppy writing. They should have done a much better job and thought of that.
ApolloBalboa
Was King of the Board for a Day
It most likely is, and I've always believed it to be so, but do they ever actually state it? I don't fully recall.
That is true, and now that I think of it, my previous post excluding the T-X was stupid. They fucked up and hoped nobody would notice, simple as that.
I've never liked the fact that they made sequels to the original. I appreciate Judgment Day for its groundbreaking special effects and the idea that it encapsulates a bit of early 90's culture, but the storyline is hokey and nowhere near as engaging as the former. I won't even give the third and fourth any notice, because I believe they've brought down what was a promising story by saying each movie progresses into another alternate timeline, therefore making it hard(er) to remember the "laws" set forth by the first. The original is a finely constructed machine (pardon the pun) that does fine as a stand-alone film, and is one of my favorites.
Nope. They don't really explain the T-1000. They leave it ambiguous, which leaves the door open for it to be nanotech (really, that's all that I could fathom it being).
I tend to agree with this. :yesyes: The original Terminator was a great film. Really, T2 is just a big dumb action movie... though, I enjoy big dumb action movies, and I like it on that level. :dunno: Honestly, I don't even really remember the other ones...
ApolloBalboa
Was King of the Board for a Day
It would have been nice to have that addressed at some point, but I'm guessing they realized they couldn't even begin to explain how nanotechnology of that capacity would work (as opposed to describing the T-800 as a hyper-alloy combat chassis, microprocessor-controlled. Fully armored; very tough).
T2 was where the films shifted from a sci-fi horror (I like to use the term technoir, like the club in the first movie) to more action-based. It was an interesting change at the time, but now I think it's run its course. I only saw the third one on television as I was flipping through my tv one day, and I've never wanted to see the abomination that was known as Salvation.
