The New FreeOnes (NOT THE FORUM) Suggestions, Comments, Complaints

[book_guy]

Would love it if the old "more stars like this star" feature were revived. Here's what I said in another thread:

Where is the "Recommended" tab gone?

I am also wondering where "recommended" babes do show up (or if they ever will again)? AFAIK Free-Ones (the old version) was the ONLY place on the ENTIRE INTERNET where "more porn stars kind-of like this porn star" was actually an operating and useful function. I do realize that the old version actually linked us merely to starlets who had been chosen as favorites by the same people; so, it was merely a crowd-sourced implication that the "more like" stars were actually like the first. But it was better than nothing. I think it would be great if there were a good functioning "more like" system where users could enter the first girl, then get more girls like her, by body-type, by ethnicity, by which sex-acts she does, what-not. Comparable characteristics, choose which characteristics, etc.. Seems like a simple-enough database query (like, duh, the info is already out there and well codified in the Free-Ones database, isn't it?) but maybe not.

 

[Petra]

Would love it if the old "more stars like this star" feature were revived. Here's what I said in another thread:


I am also wondering where "recommended" babes do show up (or if they ever will again)? AFAIK Free-Ones (the old version) was the ONLY place on the ENTIRE INTERNET where "more porn stars kind-of like this porn star" was actually an operating and useful function. I do realize that the old version actually linked us merely to starlets who had been chosen as favorites by the same people; so, it was merely a crowd-sourced implication that the "more like" stars were actually like the first. But it was better than nothing. I think it would be great if there were a good functioning "more like" system where users could enter the first girl, then get more girls like her, by body-type, by ethnicity, by which sex-acts she does, what-not. Comparable characteristics, choose which characteristics, etc.. Seems like a simple-enough database query (like, duh, the info is already out there and well codified in the Free-Ones database, isn't it?) but maybe not.

This will be coming back and hopefully I can get it in before the end of the year. Along with properly "recommended" photos and videos.

 

[Pornfan99]

I posted a separate thread, but - how about a contest??

How about one, hmmmm??

 

[Petra]

How about one, hmmmm??

How about I look at getting something organized for next month. What would you like to see as a prize?

 

[Pornfan99]

Access to a site for 1 / 3 / 6 months? Or, 3 winners to each pick a DVD from .. 10 DVDs?

 

[book_guy]

This will be coming back and hopefully I can get it in before the end of the year. Along with properly "recommended" photos and videos.

Thanks for the info! I loved being able to click on a favorite girl to get links to girls who are "similar" (whatever that could mean!) to her. Thanks for working on it. Seems like it could (should?) be a a central function of Free-Ones.

 

[whats my name]

I haven't been on here in a while. Yahh changes I love those. (insert sarcasm font at a later date)

I'll admit I've been cheating on you with other porn sites, now I've done that and I'm back can I say I'm really not loving the new look it all seems unnecessarily complicated, the old site with its nice light blue color scheme was easy on the eye. It's features were to my mind also clear and easy to use.

Yes, I have discovered you can switch back to the old color, but really who thought near pitch black was a good look in the first place, it feels very pornhub and I'm not that keen on the dark background there either.

Still as much as I'm sure all theses changes have been hard work I have to ask if anyone thought to just maybe not completely throw the old seemingly simpler design out.:

Like maybe there were some small cosmetic changes you could have made, (not sure what those might have been, but I'm sure there were small scale things you could have done instead what looks to me like burning the old house down/

I know I might be being nitpicky and may be I ill get used to the changes in time, but in my opinion the old site wasn't broke so it didn't really need fixing?

Apologise for all the negativity, I just had to put my opinion so far out there.

 

[Petra]

I haven't been on here in a while. Yahh changes I love those. (insert sarcasm font at a later date)

I'll admit I've been cheating on you with other porn sites, now I've done that and I'm back can I say I'm really not loving the new look it all seems unnecessarily complicated, the old site with its nice light blue color scheme was easy on the eye. It's features were to my mind also clear and easy to use.

Yes, I have discovered you can switch back to the old color, but really who thought near pitch black was a good look in the first place, it feels very pornhub and I'm not that keen on the dark background there either.

Still as much as I'm sure all theses changes have been hard work I have to ask if anyone thought to just maybe not completely throw the old seemingly simpler design out.:

Like maybe there were some small cosmetic changes you could have made, (not sure what those might have been, but I'm sure there were small scale things you could have done instead what looks to me like burning the old house down/

I know I might be being nitpicky and may be I ill get used to the changes in time, but in my opinion the old site wasn't broke so it didn't really need fixing?

Apologise for all the negativity, I just had to put my opinion so far out there.

I'm really sorry you don't like the changes. Hopefully you can get used to them, if there's any way of using the site that you were used to maybe let me know and I can give suggestions for doing the same on the new site.

As far as "the old site wasn't broken", what you didn't see was under the hood so to speak, was code that was written 20 years ago and could no longer be updated to run with modern day protocols. At a certain point the servers behind the site would no longer be able to communicate with the code that makes FreeOnes, FreeOnes. So we were kind of forced to upgrade.

 

[arthuro]

A new one for the "new links" page. When there is new content it also shows recent older ones which I have marked as read. I always "mark as read" button after visiting them all.

 

[rwitte]

You have started advertising photosets in advance. In the babe pages, they are clearly labelled, but on the 'new' feed they are unlabelled. In either case clicking on the link gives a 404 error. Clearly this is unacceptable. My ideal user story for this would be that the photosets only get into the 'new' feed when they become available and that the entry on the babe page is just an unclickable image in the meantime. An alternative user story which might be more commercially viable would be to have the link got to a specialised page which says 'photo set blah blah blah will become available on date' (and possibly even 'click her to get an email notification of release').

 

[Petra]

You have started advertising photosets in advance. In the babe pages, they are clearly labelled, but on the 'new' feed they are unlabelled. In either case clicking on the link gives a 404 error. Clearly this is unacceptable. My ideal user story for this would be that the photosets only get into the 'new' feed when they become available and that the entry on the babe page is just an unclickable image in the meantime. An alternative user story which might be more commercially viable would be to have the link got to a specialised page which says 'photo set blah blah blah will become available on date' (and possibly even 'click her to get an email notification of release').

This is actually a bug. We do have plans to show what's scheduled but its still in the pipe work. Thanks for the heads up.

 

[XavieriX]

One thing I suggest to fix is the babe rank graph when clicking on "this year" and "all time": there are too low peaks on some dates that make this kind of option useless.
For the rest, I really like the new site very much.

 

[Petra]

One thing I suggest to fix is the babe rank graph when clicking on "this year" and "all time": there are too low peaks on some dates that make this kind of option useless.
For the rest, I really like the new site very much.

Giving the graph some love IS on our things to do list. Unfortunately, it's a "fun thing" that is kind of behind the "things we need to do yesterday" things. Luckily, that part of the list is much shorter than it was at the first of the year. ;-)

And thank you! If you have more suggestions, feel free to post them no matter how wild or infeasible you think it.

 

[Petra]

You have started advertising photosets in advance. In the babe pages, they are clearly labelled, but on the 'new' feed they are unlabelled. In either case clicking on the link gives a 404 error. Clearly this is unacceptable. My ideal user story for this would be that the photosets only get into the 'new' feed when they become available and that the entry on the babe page is just an unclickable image in the meantime. An alternative user story which might be more commercially viable would be to have the link got to a specialised page which says 'photo set blah blah blah will become available on date' (and possibly even 'click her to get an email notification of release').

And it's now fixed.

 

[arthuro]

Another suggestion. Please increase the login cookie for the main website, as it is only set to a week. No need for that I guess, it's no bank.

 

[John_8581]

I went to try to find a birthday on a pornstar. This one in particular.

I went out to FreeOnes using the "Babes" feature and tried to put in her birthday (month, date and year) -- something is wrong with it. It seems okay when you first look at it. But once you start putting in information things start to occur. For example, not all the months are available in the dropdown box or the number of days becomes gradually reduced.

 

[Petra]

I went to try to find a birthday on a pornstar. This one in particular.

View attachment 814936

I went out to FreeOnes using the "Babes" feature and tried to put in her birthday (month, date and year) -- something is wrong with it. It seems okay when you first look at it. But once you start putting in information things start to occur. For example, not all the months are available in the dropdown box or the number of days becomes gradually reduced.

Can you give a link of the page you were searching on and a screen shot of the filter you were using? Because I just went and inputted Feb 17, 1989 and it worked just fine.

https://www.freeones.com/babes?q=&s...irthDay]=17&f[birthMonth]=2&f[birthYear]=1989

 

[John_8581]

It's working on some but not on others. I started with the 2 month, then 1989 year, and the dropdown box only gave me 14, 20, and 21 for days.

https://www.freeones.com/my/babes?q=&f[birthMonth]=2&f[birthYear]=1989&f[birthDay]=14

I reset the filter. I put in the 17 day, the dropdown box for months is 1, 3, 4, 9, 10, and 11. The years are 1968, 1969, 76, 79, 81, 84, 85, 87, 88, and 90.

 

[Petra]

It's working on some but not on others. I started with the 2 month, then 1989 year, and the dropdown box only gave me 14, 20, and 21 for days.

https://www.freeones.com/my/babes?q=&f[birthMonth]=2&f[birthYear]=1989&f[birthDay]=14

I reset the filter. I put in the 17 day, the dropdown box for months is 1, 3, 4, 9, 10, and 11. The years are 1968, 1969, 76, 79, 81, 84, 85, 87, 88, and 90.

I can't reproduce this. I get all of the days after adding month then year. What device and browser are you using?

 

[John_8581]

I can't reproduce this. I get all of the days after adding month then year. What device and browser are you using?

I'm using a desktop. My operating system is Windows 7. I'm not like everybody else. I did not do the upgrade to Windows 10 in January 2020 because certain adult websites that I visit work better using Windows 7. For example, Manyvids, Videosz, Bang, Foxes.com, Karups-Private Collection, Cosmid.net, Adultime (Gamma Entertainment - Netherlands) and two English websites, Killergram, and St. MacKenzies.com. I'm using the Chrome browser. Version 85.0.4183.83 (64 bit). Google Chrome is up to date.