The Money shot.
- Thread starter CitizenErased
- Start date
Not a big fan of it. Rather it be an internal.
Complete fulfillment is most important
To me, it's not important. What is important is what I call "complete fulfillment."
That means all the moments leading up to the orgasm is "involved" -- which doesn't mean "fast" or "intense" necessarily. I want bodies intertwined. I want long strokes, deep pumps, sensual petting. Kissing is always a major bonus, as well as hands and lips on lesser appreciated anatomy.
It also means the orgasm is not rushed. When the man or woman does ejaculate, it should be as part of the natural flow. Yes, sometimes we "really get going" when we ejaculate. But I think the thing far too many men and woman miss out on is a slow, deep and intense ejaculation. It's like the opposite of a pre-mature ejaculation where someone cums before they intended too -- the lover ejaculates well after most people assumed they would.
But even porn fucks that up -- as so many scenes seem "fabricated" on that matter. I'm talking about 30+ minutes of loving, pumping, stroking, caressing and the intensity is deep and consistent throughout until at some point, the man or woman just unloads as if nothing changed. And then while they are unloading, they keep the motion up, and they do not stop after only 2-3 ejaculations. That really kills it for me with 99% of porn!
This also means I prefer if the man is inside the bust or mouth for outtercourse, or in the ass or vagina for intercourse. And for the woman, if she can orgasm -- and repeatedly ejaculate (even if now visual) -- during intercourse, great! If not, a man should use all his tools (especially his soft tongue) to lip, lap, pierce, sooth and otherwise keep rubbing all through her orgasm so she is completely satisfied.
The fact that women "don't go" often and there is very limited porn titles that focus on only women who have "exterior/significant ejaculations" is very sad. There should be far more porn where the woman gets off, even if it's not completely noticeable in liquid or an external, visual ejaculation.
In fact, not directly seeing it but seeing the reactions/results and the "overflow" later is much, much better and more intense anyway.
To me, it's not important. What is important is what I call "complete fulfillment."
That means all the moments leading up to the orgasm is "involved" -- which doesn't mean "fast" or "intense" necessarily. I want bodies intertwined. I want long strokes, deep pumps, sensual petting. Kissing is always a major bonus, as well as hands and lips on lesser appreciated anatomy.
It also means the orgasm is not rushed. When the man or woman does ejaculate, it should be as part of the natural flow. Yes, sometimes we "really get going" when we ejaculate. But I think the thing far too many men and woman miss out on is a slow, deep and intense ejaculation. It's like the opposite of a pre-mature ejaculation where someone cums before they intended too -- the lover ejaculates well after most people assumed they would.
But even porn fucks that up -- as so many scenes seem "fabricated" on that matter. I'm talking about 30+ minutes of loving, pumping, stroking, caressing and the intensity is deep and consistent throughout until at some point, the man or woman just unloads as if nothing changed. And then while they are unloading, they keep the motion up, and they do not stop after only 2-3 ejaculations. That really kills it for me with 99% of porn!
This also means I prefer if the man is inside the bust or mouth for outtercourse, or in the ass or vagina for intercourse. And for the woman, if she can orgasm -- and repeatedly ejaculate (even if now visual) -- during intercourse, great! If not, a man should use all his tools (especially his soft tongue) to lip, lap, pierce, sooth and otherwise keep rubbing all through her orgasm so she is completely satisfied.
The fact that women "don't go" often and there is very limited porn titles that focus on only women who have "exterior/significant ejaculations" is very sad. There should be far more porn where the woman gets off, even if it's not completely noticeable in liquid or an external, visual ejaculation.
In fact, not directly seeing it but seeing the reactions/results and the "overflow" later is much, much better and more intense anyway.
Its a must? What do the girls think?
dick van cock
Closed Account
Did I miss something? Is it National Day of the Zombie Bumps?
:1orglaugh :glugglug:
Zombie's are kind of cool. It's nice to see the list of "victims" in the beginning of the thread, people who are no longer "active" (alive!) and then seeing how many new victims the Zombie claims...
This happens to be worth a post, so I'll answer it.
The moneyshot is essential to porn. I prefer tit shots to facials but I miss the dude unloading on the chick's ass or lower back, right from doggy. The backside moneyshot is a lost art today!
i like a scene where the girl is naked, kneeling in front of the guy, her nipples erect showing her excitement then she stick out her tongue to catch the cumshot and swallows and enjoys it!. I find cumshots over her tits or belly quite a turn on ,but no so much plastered all over faces.
i think its pretty crucial...about as crucial as the 4th quarter in a football game
Honestly, it depends on the male star in the scene a lot of the time. When they try to "steal the scene" so to speak and won't shut the fuck up, making stupid-ass sound effects and shit. It's terrible and can completely ruin the scene and any moment.
Of course, a lot of the time it can make you remember that you're watching fantasy too, which is also a big turnoff. There's a lot of things in pornography that just aren't realistic in your personal life in the bedroom.
If you can suspend your disbelief and have the show on mute though, it's called the "money shot" for a reason.
Of course, a lot of the time it can make you remember that you're watching fantasy too, which is also a big turnoff. There's a lot of things in pornography that just aren't realistic in your personal life in the bedroom.
If you can suspend your disbelief and have the show on mute though, it's called the "money shot" for a reason.
mandatory 
i like it on their face.
i like it on their face.Absolutely nothing hotter than seeing a willing girl take a huge fuckin load directly to the face ,mouth, and tongue!
Money shots that match my life are erotic ...
Unfortunately, too many in porn are not.
I love it when the "money shot" is ...
- Pumping all-the-way until spent between breasts (no hands)
- Creampies and, even rarer, creampies pumping all-the-way until spent
- Oral unloads, deep in her mouth, either she drools or swallows (combinations are good too)
I don't like it when they guy "pulls out and hands himself."
I've never really gone for facials at all.
Money shots that match my life are erotic.
Unfortunately, too many in porn are not.
I love it when the "money shot" is ...
- Pumping all-the-way until spent between breasts (no hands)
- Creampies and, even rarer, creampies pumping all-the-way until spent
- Oral unloads, deep in her mouth, either she drools or swallows (combinations are good too)
I don't like it when they guy "pulls out and hands himself."
I've never really gone for facials at all.
I can take it or leave it.
Similar threads
