The Hipocracy Of This Site's Many Members

[Digital]

Now don't get me wrong, i love freeones, its just the majority of the members that get on my fucking nerves. The twisted nature of your so called morality is bewildering to say the least. Why is it that whenever a member posts a thread looking for a niche that is somewhat off centre, such as throat fucking or terror of terrors, he who must not be named- max hardcore, then they get shot down as an ambominable pervert, who should ne taken to the nearest wall and shot against it? Its the double standards that i cannot stand. Its ok for you to watch videos of women being cummed on, fucked in the ass etc but thats ok because its 'mainstream'.
I admit that i love watchin a whore (thats what they are folks) get face fucked, degraded, spat on n generally abused. They have agreed to this, signed on the dotted line, recieved a cheque for their services and go home reletively happy at the end of it. This is porn in the 21st century. The sluts we all jack off to make more money than most, agree to do these things, and occasionally enjoy it, yet the majority of people on this site still want to hold them up as idols. To put it simply- Fuck That.

I await the angry mob with baited breath.....

I agree with most of that.

 

[BlueBalls]

Gigolos

 

[Friday on my mind]

There has been a lot of talk should porn actresses be called whores or not. If they are called whores, then what is the name for male porn actors, who also get paid for having sex in front of camera?

Male whores? :dunno:

Studs, but that isn't a double standard is it?

 

[lovejoy]

My ex- used to sing hymns on Sundays morning (11 a.m.) in church and fucked like a porn star on Sunday afternoon (2 p.m.). She even made home-made movies. So are we all a little bit hypocritical !

 

[lone gunman]

Surely this is exactly what the thread starter meant regarding hypocrisy.

It's ok to like the "simplest form of pornography being two consensual people having run of the mill, albeit graphic sex," as this is perfectly normal, natural and healthy.

But stray from those specific boundaries into anything that would appear to be different from the mainstream and you're a "worryingly" dirty pervert. :dunno:

One person's taboo is another person's fetish and is yet another person's mainstream.

It takes all sorts and I for one is glad it does.

Absolutely.

I think its more worrying the people who arent satisfied by the simplest form of pornography being two consensual people having run of the mill, albeit graphic sex in an open environment, who go on to look for harder and harder stuff til the most bizarre things are appearing on the internet.

You say if you never saw it, you wouldnt do it and wouldnt enjoy it, where as the frightening truth is, if it can be thought of, someone will do it and there will be those who enjoy it.

www.horny-paraplegics.com - "See wheelchair bound hotties doing the dirtiest things and having screaming orgasms, even though they havent felt a thing below the waist in years"

www.dirty-epileptics.com - I wanted to poke fun at that one, but the name alone makes me laugh to hard.

How far can a person take their fetish for porn and defend it?

DOA,that is total nonsense.

 

[Facetious]

I say that weakener, bambi and 123 are one in the same, given the common ornery temperament of the 3 >1.

That's my theory (conspiracy) . . and I'm stickin too it ! :thefinger

 

[stainedblueyes]

Groans... it's good that people still feel secure enough to stand up and voice opinions, but sometimes it just feels like they are out to pick fights, which classes them somewhere between cretins and idiots in my book.

 

[lone gunman]

Groans... it's good that people still feel secure enough to stand up and voice opinions, but sometimes it just feels like they are out to pick fights, which classes them somewhere between cretins and idiots in my book.

That is not the case here,I assure you.

 

[hothannah]

Groans... it's good that people still feel secure enough to stand up and voice opinions, but sometimes it just feels like they are out to pick fights, which classes them somewhere between cretins and idiots in my book.

Yeah? Wanna make sommat of it? :fight:

 

[stainedblueyes]

That is not the case here,I assure you.

Good for you my friend... I abhore all violence *stows the bike chain*

Yeah? Wanna make sommat of it? :fight:

Aye, why not

 

[calpoon]

That's all very well and good, if we were talking just about sexual violence. However, I have seen many people criticize, poo-poo and generally ridicule other members for all kinds of fetishes, most of which do not involve any sexual violence what so ever.

Ok, well if that were the case, I would say that to be true. I'll take your word for it because I don't see that as being the norm here, but maybe I'm just not looking in the right (or wrong) place.

It's fine to discuss changing mores, indeed it should be discussed on here if anywhere, but that is taking what I was saying out of context. the context of my reply was to the thread starters post which I felt to violent, as you say, and generally derogatory, both in terms of porn and porn actors and to members of this board.

 

[jack123]

Groans... it's good that people still feel secure enough to stand up and voice opinions, but sometimes it just feels like they are out to pick fights, which classes them somewhere between cretins and idiots in my book.

I can assure u that i am neither a cretin or an idiot and neither was i out merely to pick a fight. All i wanted to do was to raise the point that there are certain people on these boards who are unfairly marginalised by the porn moral majority.

 

[senob44]

I can assure u that i am neither a cretin or an idiot and neither was i out merely to pick a fight. All i wanted to do was to raise the point that there are certain people on these boards who are unfairly marginalised by the porn moral majority.

Cretin...No. Idiot....No. Misogynist...Quite Possibly.

And to the subject that HotHannah brought up, well my philosophy on fetishes is that they are certainly OK as long as they don't indicate or depict any non-consensual violence toward any participants. Some fetishes can be weird, but I try not to ridicule others desires as long as they are not harmful. I hope I'm not one of the ones you meant, HotHannah. If I am, please tell me and I will make an effort to be more accepting.

 

[jack123]

Cretin...No. Idiot....No. Misogynist...Quite Possibly.

And to the subject that HotHannah brought up, well my philosophy on fetishes is that they are certainly OK as long as they don't indicate or depict any non-consensual violence toward any participants. Some fetishes can be weird, but I try not to ridicule others desires as long as they are not harmful. I hope I'm not one of the ones you meant, HotHannah. If I am, please tell me and I will make an effort to be more accepting.

Although, wouldnt you agree that we are all misogynists to some extent, after all this is a porn forum....

 

[calpoon]

I read Silence Of The Lambs... does that make me Jeffery Dahmer?

 

[jack123]

I read Silence Of The Lambs... does that make me Jeffery Dahmer?

I dont think that thats the best analogy.

What i was trying to say is that isnt the act of looking at porn misogynistic?

 

[senob44]

I dont think that thats the best analogy.

What i was trying to say is that isnt the act of looking at porn misogynistic?

No it isn't. We aren't wishing to see any ill will happen to these women. If anything we are worshipping their beauty and supporting their careers. Some people think there is beauty in the female form. You think there is beauty in seeing it disrespected, beaten and otherwise subjugated. Big difference.

 

[calpoon]

Honestly, I'd have to say that yes it is.

But that's only because there is a general attitude of misogyny in society and that is channeled into porn as well, to a varying degree. emphasis on that last part.

there's nothing that defaults watching people having sex as wrong in any way different than people having sex.

but the feelings and motivations of the individual are what can make a difference.

 

[jack123]

No it isn't. We aren't wishing to see any ill will happen to these women. If anything we are worshipping their beauty and supporting their careers. Some people think there is beauty in the female form. You think there is beauty in seeing it disrespected, beaten and otherwise subjugated. Big difference.

This is what i have a problem understanding. You say that you are worshipping the whores featured on these boards, are you one of those people who fall over themselves to prasie one of the 'star checked members' that make occasional appearences on these boards in the attempt to make us believe that we are valued fans? I've always seen this as a double standard. When you're writing your doting posts to them arent you really fantasising what it would be like to blow a load over them or fuck them?

 

[calpoon]

No. and the fact that you don't understand why not is the problem.