Terrorist attack in french satyrical newspaper ; 12 killed

Because such important news should be dealt with seriously and should not be used to promote Islamophobia, unlike an OCSM actually did...


Terror Attack on Charlie Hebdo Newspaper in Paris Kills 12


Masked gunmen burst into the Paris offices of a French satirical newspaper on Wednesday and killed 12 people, including top journalists and two police officers, before fleeing in a car. The gunmen were still at large at dusk, as an extensive police dragnet spread across a traumatized city.

Among the dead were four prominent cartoonists who have repeatedly lampooned Islamic terrorists and the Prophet Muhammad, leading to speculation that the attack on the newspaper, Charlie Hebdo, was the work of Islamic militants acting alone or in concert with extremist groups.

A police guard assigned to protect the newspaper was among the first victims. A second police officer, who responded to reports of the shooting, was killed on the sidewalk outside the office by the fleeing suspects, the Paris police said. The shooting of the second police officer was captured in a widely-seen video.

President François Hollande immediately declared that the attack was an act of terrorism and an assault on freedom of the press. He ratcheted up France’s nationwide terror alert to its highest level, and met with his cabinet in an emergency session. He said France was already on high alert after several planned terrorist attacks were thwarted in recent weeks.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility, but several websites and Twitter accounts associated with extremist groups applauded the violence, calling it revenge for the newspaper’s satirical treatment of Islam and its prophet.

Additional security was put in place at houses of worship, news media offices and transportation centers in Paris, and many schools were locked down as the search for the gunmen continued.

The radio station France Info quoted a witness as saying that he saw the attack from a nearby building in the heart of the French capital, not far from the Place des Vosges.

“About half an hour ago, two black-hooded men entered the building with Kalashnikovs,” the witness, Benoît Bringer, told the station. “A few minutes later, we heard lots of shots.” He added that the men were then seen fleeing the building.

Xavier Castaing, a police spokesman, said that three armed, masked men forced their way into the offices, firing indiscriminately at people in the lobby and wounding many. He said that they were carrying AK-47 rifles, and that the attack lasted several minutes before the assailants fled by car.

News reports said the gunmen shot at the police outside the building as they escaped. Several journalists sought safety on the roof of the building during the attack.

In 2011, the Charlie Hebdo office was badly damaged by a firebomb after it published a spoof issue “guest edited” by the Prophet Muhammad to salute the victory of an Islamist party in Tunisian elections. It had announced plans to publish a special issue renamed “Charia Hebdo,” a play on the word in French for Shariah law.

A lawyer for the newspaper said that a number of prominent editors and cartoonists had been killed on Wednesday, including Stéphane Charbonnier, known as Charb, and Jean Cabut, who signs his work Cabu. He said that the cartoonists Georges Wolinski and Bernard Verlhac were also among the victims.

The police said that they had discovered an abandoned car in the 19th Arrondissement, a relatively poor, heavily populated area of Paris. They said they believed it was used by the gunmen.

One journalist at the Charlie Hebdo office, who asked that her name not be used, texted a friend after the shooting: “I’m alive. There is death all around me. Yes, I am there. The jihadists spared me.”

A senior United States counterterrorism official said on Wednesday that the American authorities were following the developments in Paris closely, but that they had not yet identified any individuals or groups who might be responsible for the attack.

The American official noted that, according to social media reports, the attackers did refer to the Prophet Muhammad, saying he was “avenged.”

President Obama issued a statement condemning the attack.

“Time and again, the French people have stood up for the universal values that generations of our people have defended,” he said. “France, and the great city of Paris where this outrageous attack took place, offer the world a timeless example that will endure well beyond the hateful vision of these killers. We are in touch with French officials, and I have directed my administration to provide any assistance needed to help bring these terrorists to justice.”

In a letter addressed to Mr. Hollande, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany offered condolences, saying, “In this difficult hour, we stand close at the side of our French friends.”

“This horrible act is not only an attack on the lives of French citizens and the domestic security of France,” Ms. Merkel said. “It also stands as an attack on the freedom of expression and the press, a core element of our free, democratic culture that can in no way be justified.”

The cover of the newspaper on Wednesday featured a caricature of Michel Houellebecq, a controversial novelist whose sixth novel, “Submission,” imagines a France one day run by Muslims, in which women forsake Western dress and polygamy is introduced. On the cover, Mr. Houellebecq is depicted as a wizard and smoking a cigarette. “In 2022, I will do Ramadan,” he is shown saying.

The book’s publication, ahead of presidential elections in 2017, comes as the increasingly influential far-right National Front has helped spur a loud and often acrimonious debate about immigration. The attack comes as nearly 1,000 French citizens have gone or planned to join jihadist groups in Iraq and Syria last year, further fueling concerns about radical Islam encroaching into France.

Last month, Prime Minister Manuel Valls ordered hundreds of additional military personnel onto the streets to reinforce a routine deployment of security forces after a string of attacks across France raised alarm about Islamic militancy.

In Dijon and Nantes, a total of 23 people were wounded when men drove vehicles into crowds, with one of the drivers shouting a Muslim rallying cry. The authorities depicted both drivers as mentally unstable.

The attacks stoked concerns that militants were ramping up attacks against French citizens in retaliation for the French government’s support for the United States-led air campaign against Islamic State militants in Syria and Iraq. The attacks came after violence attributed to lone-wolf attackers in London in 2013, in Canada in October, and in Sydney, Australia, last month.

Charlie Hebdo is part of a venerable tradition in France, deploying satire and insolence to take on politicians and the police, bankers and religions of all kinds, including this week a mock debate about whether Jesus existed or not.

The weekly was born in controversy in 1970 with the ban of a publication called Hara-Kiri after it mocked the death of former President Charles de Gaulle. That prompted its journalists to set up a new weekly, Charlie Hebdo, a reference to its reprint of Charlie Brown cartoons from the United States.

The publication, which has a weekly circulation of about 30,000, suffered through periods in the 1980s when it ceased publication. Like other frail journals in the French newspaper industry, it recently issued appeals to its readers for financial aid with a declaration on its site, “Charlie Is in Danger.”

Michael J. Morell, the former deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency and now a consultant to CBS News, said it was unclear whether the gunmen acted on their own or were directed by organized groups.

“This is the worst terrorist attack in Europe since the attacks in London in July of 2005,” Mr. Morell said. “The motive here is absolutely clear: trying to shut down a media organization that lampooned the Prophet Muhammad. So, no doubt in my mind that this is terrorism.”

He added, “What we have to figure out here is the perpetrators and whether they were self-radicalized or whether they were individuals who fought in Syria and Iraq and came back, or whether they were actually directed by ISIS or Al Qaeda.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/08/world/europe/charlie-hebdo-paris-shooting.html


1st I think about the victims and their families.



Charlie Hebdo is a well known satyrical newspaper, the journalists and cartoonists working for the paper are often provocative, about everyone : the politicians (wether they are Left, Right or Center), religions (Judaïdm, Christianism, Islam...), celebrities, etc...

89732903_p.jpg
 
My thoughts and prayers go to the people of France. This was a horrible attack by a pack of cowards. I would also hold Islamic Extremism to account also realizing I live around many decent Muslims that are regular people just like me.

Times like this is when friends and allies like France and America should stick together.
 

tartanterrier

Is somewhere outhere.
It's a shame about the innocent folks who got killed, and I hope those who were wounded & survived make a full recovery from this tragedy.
 

SabrinaDeep

Official Checked Star Member
Blaming radical Islam is OK. But some people blame Islam as a whole, claim that moderate Islam doesn't exist.

It's too complicated for you, Johan. Have someone explaining my post to you and when you have understood it, feel free to agree or disagree supporting your opinion with facts and data.
Just for your record, i'm Canadian, of Ukrainian descent, married to an Italian and living is Spain: i'm certainly not xenophobic as you gently called me on the ironic reputation you gave me. About islamophobic, that means nothing: it's like calling someone who doesn't like Scientology Scientologyphobic or someone who does not like apples applephobic or if you prefer why not calling the muslims Christianophobics?...it's just a terror term invented by people who cannot stand opinions different from theirs...we could call them opiniophobics...
But if you want to use that term, there is nothing wrong in being afraid of something that threatens your safety and security and it does not mean that you hate everybody pertaining to a certain category; at the same time, silence over brutality sounds more like approval over condemnation and i have simply stated that lack of public and loud condemnation of such barbaric acts by the worldwide moderate muslim organizations makes me believe that adding quotes to the word moderate is necessary. When they will proactively and clearly start isolating the radicals from their communities i will be more than happy to review my position. Until then, the word moderate remains an empty one or if you prefer a quoted one, for me, and i won't stop expressing my opinion about it.

I know who i am and what i do on a daily basis for people in needs of any class, religion, race, gender and sexual orientation and i couldn't be more indifferent to your violent wording and opinion of me.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
http://styrogoatse.tumblr.com/post/105376980265/before-joining-the-fdny-my-stepfather-was-one-of

If it quacks like a duck..........who the fuck else are you going to blame but radical islam?


Goddamn it. I was going to link to a buzzfeed story about the solidarity of cartoonists and their condemnation of the asshole terrorists. I gotta pay more attention to what I'm doing. Could've been worse, though. It could have been tubgirl, as I am wont to do.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesth...se-to-the-ch?bffb&utm_term=4ldqpgp#.ryW15oOXa
 
So a cartoon causes a terrorist attack that results in 12 dead. Yet out government releases any and all classified information regarding the tactics used by our military. and the CIA to gain information. it is a blatant attempt to embarrass them to capitulate to their leftist agenda of no EIT under any circumstances. Yeah liberals, get your panties all in a wad over some film being made, or a cartoon but no way would releasing sensitive info about techniques ever cause radical terrorist to want to retaliate. I can't figure out if the lefties in Washington are making calculated decisions to weaken us and make us targets or they are just that fucking dumb! The hypocrisy and/or stupidity by the leftwing D-baggers knows no bounds.
 
Not that shooting the staff is justified in any way, but what's more disturbing is the video going around showing the gunman shooting the wounded Policeman in the head. He had nothing to do with their cause and was clearly incapacitated, and if anything put a bigger target on their head.
Lets hope the raid in Reims goes well.
 
freedom of speech vs insulting and creating stereotypes. fuck france, fuck ISIS, fuck Charlie Hebdo, fuck ignorance!
 
It was bound to happen, I clearly remember stating such a few years back at some time and place... may they RIP and particularly those who fell for 'their' right to pen such satirically offensive materials, may they RIP.
 
So a cartoon causes a terrorist attack that results in 12 dead. Yet out government releases any and all classified information regarding the tactics used by our military. and the CIA to gain information. it is a blatant attempt to embarrass them to capitulate to their leftist agenda of no EIT under any circumstances. Yeah liberals, get your panties all in a wad over some film being made, or a cartoon but no way would releasing sensitive info about techniques ever cause radical terrorist to want to retaliate. I can't figure out if the lefties in Washington are making calculated decisions to weaken us and make us targets or they are just that fucking dumb! The hypocrisy and/or stupidity by the leftwing D-baggers knows no bounds.

It's both. The cultural Marxist left has sought to undermine and destroy the United States for decades, just like they've done to other countries. As for the average liberal, they're too wedded to their ideology to see or admit the kind of evil and destruction they have unleashed on Western civilization. The policies and behavior they have encouraged in Europe is going to lead to the genocide of the native people's there.

Some Left wingers are so sick, they see it as a good thing.
 

Mayhem

Banned
The cultural Marxist left has sought to undermine and destroy the United States for decades
Really? In favor of what?
just like they've done to other countries.
Really? Which ones?
As for the average liberal, they're too wedded to their ideology to see or admit the kind of evil and destruction they have unleashed on Western civilization.
Really? Like what?
The policies and behavior they have encouraged in Europe is going to lead to the genocide of the native people's there.
Really? When?
Some Left wingers are so sick, they see it as a good thing.
Really? Like who?
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
Tributes were today being paid to heroic Muslim police officer Ahmed Merabet, who was executed by a terrorist gunman on the streets of Paris while he begged for his life. Shocking footage of the attack on the Charlie Hebdo office shows Mr Merabet on the ground and begging for mercy as he is killed casually by a gunshot to the head. Witnesses say he asked 'do you want to kill me?' before the gunman replied 'OK, chief'. It is understood that Mr Merabet was a married Parisian cycle cop assigned to the 11th arrondissement – the Paris neighborhood where Charlie Hebdo's office is located and known for its dining and fine wines. Mr Merabet was one of 12 people killed in the terrifying attack, including eight journalists at the offices of the French satirical newspaper, two guests, and one other policeman.

pariscop.jpg


Several Paris police officers who came into contact with the armed terrorists retreated from the gunmen because they were unarmed, according to an eyewitness. Merabet was not one of them. It is not a knock on Parisian police, but on French domestic policy to note and criticize the fact that the first responders who arrived at the scene were unarmed and therefore entirely unprepared to face an ongoing attack by murderous, AK-47 wielding gunmen. A wise man once said, "Never call an unarmed person 'security'."
 
Tributes were today being paid to heroic Muslim police officer Ahmed Merabet, who was executed by a terrorist gunman on the streets of Paris while he begged for his life. Shocking footage of the attack on the Charlie Hebdo office shows Mr Merabet on the ground and begging for mercy as he is killed casually by a gunshot to the head. Witnesses say he asked 'do you want to kill me?' before the gunman replied 'OK, chief'. It is understood that Mr Merabet was a married Parisian cycle cop assigned to the 11th arrondissement – the Paris neighborhood where Charlie Hebdo's office is located and known for its dining and fine wines. Mr Merabet was one of 12 people killed in the terrifying attack, including eight journalists at the offices of the French satirical newspaper, two guests, and one other policeman.

pariscop.jpg



Several Paris police officers who came into contact with the armed terrorists retreated from the gunmen because they were unarmed, according to an eyewitness. Merabet was not one of them. It is not a knock on Parisian police, but on French domestic policy to note and criticize the fact that the first responders who arrived at the scene were unarmed and therefore entirely unprepared to face an ongoing attack by murderous, AK-47 wielding gunmen. A wise man once said, "Never call an unarmed person 'security'."


He was the armed police officer who hopped out of the police car and ran towards the gunmen to engage them with his weapon. I would have to wonder why Parisian cops aren't armed seeing that Europe is adjacent to the Middle East and Russia, so it's not hard to get weapons into most European countries. So criminals can get access to heavy weapons, yet the average policeman can't have them? All it does it encourage people to attack and challenge the police.
 
As for the average liberal, they're too wedded to their ideology to see or admit the kind of evil and destruction they have unleashed on Western civilization.

yes. why in the USA alone liberals have been responsible for

the abolition of slavery
child labor laws
women's suffrage
the GI bill
food and workplace safety laws
the civil rights acts

I could go on but why bother? From those examples alone their evil destructiveness should be abundantly obvious.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
Civil rights act was a Republican bill. I won't go issue by issue to point out how stupid your post is but any of it is easily rebutted. None of that stuff would have happened without bipartisanship.
 

BlkHawk

Closed Account
Don't confuse liberal/conservative with political parties. All those things he listed were liberal ideas at the time no matter the political party. There have been very bad liberal ideas as well communism, and prohibition spring to mind.
 
Top