Simulated **** porn...

[Rey C.]

Here in the U.S., it usually comes down to community standards... as Kimberly Kupps found out just a couple of days ago.
Premium Link Upgrade

What may not be obscene to one may be obscene to another in your community. There is no universal standard.

 

[grower_boy]

anything having to do with ****, even if it is obviously simulated, should be out lawed, and anyone that is involved in it should be put in jail for life

That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Are you serious?

 

[JacknCoke]

What about the amateur couple that shoots a home video of his girlfriend coming home and waking him up to a surprise BJ? Should we ban that site too?

I was thinking about referencing something like this in my response but I was not quite sure if it of the same caliber. I don't have a very good grasp of what the video content actually shows though.

 

[zell]

If a woman is ****** then obviously she cannot consent. So are websites like 'sleepcreep' simulated ****?

HA! I was thinking about making that same type of thread,and to answer the question,abso-fucking-lutely!

I like porn just as much as anyone else,but there just has to be a line.Fucking a girl that's ****** is fucking ****,and it will get your ass thrown in jail real quick.

As far as them promoting ****,well if they are selling porn that simulates(and let's be clear,this is all set up and consensual)****,then it would seem that's exactly what they are selling,and not necessarily promoting,but it's a very blurry topic,imo.

Either way,I don't like it and think it's not very entertaining nor erotic.

 

[gunslingingbird]

Though I see the point of your discussion, I'm pretty sure it's still against the rules. You shouldn't start a thread about a forbidden subject unless you're discussing an article from a reputable news site. For now I'm gonna close this thread, pending administrative approval of the topic.

 

[Petra]

Though I see the point of your discussion, I'm pretty sure it's still against the rules. You shouldn't start a thread about a forbidden subject unless you're discussing an article from a reputable news site. For now I'm gonna close this thread, pending administrative approval of the topic.

Technically GSB is right. We don't normally allow topics like this unless there's some sort of valid news source about what's being discussed.

However, I've talked it over with Roald and since this has been a pretty civil discussion thus far and it's not about the act of ****, more the ethics behind sites like ***** Creep (which is completely legal since it is consensual), we see no reason not to let the thread continue.

I will add the warning though...if you don't think you can make a mature contribution to the thread, don't post.

 

[squallumz]

can we still say things like "caca poopy pants" though?

 

[Petra]

can we still say things like "caca poopy pants" though?

I know you're feeling neglected since my messenger is broken...don't make me ban you just so you can get attention from me. ;-P

 

[Johan]

To me, simulated **** in porn s dangerous. I fear it could create the fantasy of ****** girls among some guys.

Beside this, the thing wich is relly exciting in porn is to see the girls enjoying the sex, even if she's not realy enjoying it, the main thing is to see the pleasure on her face, the filth in her eyes. Even if there's sometime a bit of pain. If thee is only pain and no pleasure, it's not hot anymore.

 

[squallumz]

I know you're feeling neglected since my messenger is broken...don't make me ban you just so you can get attention from me. ;-P

actually, i was totally expecting a ban for at least a few minutes. its so dead around here right now anyway! :1orglaugh

 

[ramabanana]

Apologies for not checking the rules and thanks for keeping the thread open.

In response to other comments, I think porn like this should be allowed but they should make it clear it's consensual. On porn promoting/influencing behaviour I think it's a chicken and egg problem (ie does misogynisitc porn cause misogyny or misogyny cause misogynisitc porn?).

Also, to Petra and gunslingingbird, I can see how I may have broken the rules but they don't seem to make sense. I mean this site links to simulated **** porn but doesn't allow discussion of it. Isn't that hypocritical?

PS Sites like sleepcreep may be legal wherever this site is based but possession of such porn is ******* in the UK (where the law on porn is a major ass).

 

[Death-Proof-69]

To me, simulated **** in porn s dangerous. I fear it could create the fantasy of ****** girls among some guys.

Beside this, the thing wich is relly exciting in porn is to see the girls enjoying the sex, even if she's not realy enjoying it, the main thing is to see the pleasure on her face, the filth in her eyes. Even if there's sometime a bit of pain. If thee is only pain and no pleasure, it's not hot anymore.

unfortunately there's too much of stuff out there that already falls into that category...far too much IMO and i really do think that it will lead to increased sexual aggression from males in the near future, teach your loved ones how to defend themselves and avoid making themselves vulnerable is all i can say...:2 cents:

 

[grower_boy]

I think that the extreme/edgy types of porn aren't for everyone, and the people who enjoy it shouldn't be judged. It's pretty easy to seperate fantasy for reality.

 

[Supafly]

An important point neglected in this discussion is that most more intelligent people can't imagine how people's ind work who are not as intelligent. I have worked with people with IQs like, around 60. These people think everything on TV is true.

One example: One young man I worked with for three weeks had an IQ of 64. He thought that Battlestar Galactica is real. And he thought Ice T is really that cool cop in the film 'New Jack City'. To him, that was more like a documentary

So **** fantasy movies are really dangerous. It can be compared to the 'Bum Fight' clips or the 'Happy Slapping' videos **** make today. Over-the-top ********, filmed by their peers for the sheer rush of adrenaline and for proving how extreme you are.

 

[Death-Proof-69]

I think that the extreme/edgy types of porn aren't for everyone, and the people who enjoy it shouldn't be judged. It's pretty easy to seperate fantasy for reality.

for you and me and most people you might talk to on a regular basis sure...but trust me, there's ALOT of people out there who have some serious issues with separating fantasy and reality

 

[Jon S.]

First I would like to express my appreciation and amazement to most of the people who have posted to this thread. When I saw it, I said "good lord, what's inside there". To my amazement, most share my mindset on the issue, and everyone seems to have taken the topic seriously. Kudos!

Now, from my vantage point, I would ask what kind of person would be into and/or get excited by "simulated ****" porn to begin with? And, one must not be dismissive when addressing that question. I mean, HONESTLY, what kind of person has fantasies about **** and ****** women exactly? SERIOUSLY, take a minute to think about that question. Reading over the posts in here, there seems to be a clear concensus concering the issue of ****....and that's because normal/healthy people aren't into ****** people. It's easy to say that "people who are into that "fantasy" type porn should not be judged". I say....why not? Clearly any reasonable person would have to admit that someone who is into that type stuff ("****" porn) has issues....and I for one would rather that person get the help and treatment that they clearly need BEFORE they move on to actually acting out on their fantasy. I hope most people would agree with that sentiment. How often do you watch a particular porn movie or scene before you get bored with it....think about it.

When people view things, it has been proven that they become desensitized to them, and I believe this type of material ("****" porn) would be essentially nothing less than pouring fuel on a fire.....because, as I already stated, and I ask you to think about it one more time, what kind of person would be into that type stuff again exactly in the first place? It's no coincidence that many rapists are/were into that so-called "edgy" porn. Think about it. :2 cents:

Note: For the purpose of full disclosure, I have a Bachelor's Degree in Criminal Justice (Penn State), and am working toward my Masters in Public Administration (with a concentration in Criminal Justice)...so, my views were actually based upon research and my education as opposed to any "judgements" or factless based assessments. It's my educated opinion if you will.

 

[fgsefgs]

The last 3 posts sort of have the same theme that there are people who can't keep fantasy and reality separate, that seeing something like simulated **** may spur them on to do it themselves and that's why sites with content like that should not be allowed but I don't think society should be dictated by the lowest common denominator. There are plenty of normal people who are into all kinds of weird/possibly dangerous things that mongs can't handle in a harmless way. I think this is similar to *** control or violent video games or anything like that. An idiot could watch a simulated **** and want to try it just like they could play GTA or watch The Godfather and want to shoot someone. I would feel equally uncomfortable seeing a tard buying a *** as I would seeing him buy a '****' porno but I would not want to ban guns/**** porno/video games or anything along those lines. Instead of pointing society to a direction where all the sharp corners are padded to make up for these people, I think society should advance forward and try to change so that these people are less common, through better parenting, harsher penalties for these kind of crimes and all that good horseshit.

 

[Jon S.]

Like I said though...what kind of person would be into "**** porn" exactly? Think about that again. It would be someone who already has "issues". Harsher penalties for the crime itself is dealing with it AFTER the fact and AFTER a woman has possibly needlessly become a victim. The fact remains that most of your serial rapists (habitual if you will) all had so-called "edgy" porn in common. So, I don't know why any reasonable person would want to go there in the first place.

Guns and video games serve a sometimes legitimate purpose...."**** porn" in my opinion, only serves to feed the minds of people who already have "issues," for sans those "issues" I can not imagine anyone being into it or being turned on by it. A healthy and normal human being can not be into or turned on by watching a woman being *****....simulated or otherwise. Think about it....any reasonable person knows this to be true.

 

[grower_boy]

^But what about all of the couples who act out **** scenes in the bedroom? Are they all screwed up too? :dunno:

 

[Jon S.]

^But what about all of the couples who act out **** scenes in the bedroom? Are they all screwed up too? :dunno:

Simply put...yes they are (though I'm guessing it would be the male who suggests it & the woman would go along with it...I just can't imagine many if any women wanting to do **** "role play").

Like I said, a healthy and normal human being should not, and would not be into ****** people...even as a fantasy or simulated. The fact remains that every evil and vile act ever committed began as a thought. Sad but true.