If a woman is ****** then obviously she cannot consent. So are websites like 'sleepcreep' simulated ****?
In the UK the creation or possesion of porn depicting real or simulated **** (and ******** - bdsm porn, and bdsm itself (see R v Brown)) is ******* in the UK.
When the laws on BDSM where introduced a number of organisations, including human rights group Liberty, argued that the issue should be about consent. They argued that sites should be required to do what kink.com do and have interviews at the start of a scene to show that what's happening is consensual.
So are sites like 'sleepcreep' promoting ****?
Personally I agree that the issue is about consent. If a site makes it clear that what is happening is a game/play (eg I don't get off on things like pornstar punishment but they make it clear that it's consensual) then thats ok but sites that promote non-consensual sex without provisos seem to be promoting ****.
In the UK the creation or possesion of porn depicting real or simulated **** (and ******** - bdsm porn, and bdsm itself (see R v Brown)) is ******* in the UK.
When the laws on BDSM where introduced a number of organisations, including human rights group Liberty, argued that the issue should be about consent. They argued that sites should be required to do what kink.com do and have interviews at the start of a scene to show that what's happening is consensual.
So are sites like 'sleepcreep' promoting ****?
Personally I agree that the issue is about consent. If a site makes it clear that what is happening is a game/play (eg I don't get off on things like pornstar punishment but they make it clear that it's consensual) then thats ok but sites that promote non-consensual sex without provisos seem to be promoting ****.
