Should the Bush taxcuts be extended?

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
What about tax cuts financed by deficit spending?

__________________



this is a trap right?
no.
thats not the answer either, i believe.
i dont believe in deficit spending too much.
at least not with the current deficit and the projected future one.
its too big at this point to be playing with.

less spending, less taxes for those who pay them.
balanced budget.
whats so hard about that.

and stick that popcorn up your arse
 
What about tax cuts financed by deficit spending?

__________________



this is a trap right?
no.
thats not the answer either, i believe.
i dont believe in deficit spending too much.
at least not with the current deficit and the projected future one.
its too big at this point to be playing with.

less spending, less taxes for those who pay them.
balanced budget.
whats so hard about that.

and stick that popcorn up your arse

Well..super genius..that is where the point of demarcation is... It's not just about keeping the tax cuts...it's whether or not we continue to finance the $300B by borrowing. Or did you know that??

So, I'll ask again...do you support borrowing to pay for these tax cuts or not (because that's what we've been doing all these years of their existence)?
:popcorn:
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
i knew it was a trap!

no........yes.....
can i phone a friend?
50/50?
oh jeez.
ok my final answer.
No.
I hope i'm right, i really want to win that car.
 
i knew it was a trap!

no........yes.....
can i phone a friend?
50/50?
oh jeez.
ok my final answer.
No.
I hope i'm right, i really want to win that car.

A trap? I suppose if you don't know all the particulars about the issue then you would see a simple question asking which poison you are willing to accept as a trap.

But...those are the issues at hand despite the fact that G:clown:pers won't say it and Demos are to stupid to make the point for some reason.

PS...next time just say you don't know enough about the issue to make an intelligent response.:2 cents:

Now go ahead and come back with the ubiquitous 'why are you quoting me', 'you are just insulting me' ...or whatever blah blah blah..can't defend my point team anti Hot Mega response...:1orglaugh
 
OK. To those who say we do not need to raise taxes because cutting spending will be enough to balance the budget. My question is where specifically would you cut spending. Remember social security and medicare have a separate source for funding and any cuts would not effect the general budget deficits. So here is a detailed look at the budget. So tell me what you would cut. Stopping waste, fraud and ***** is a pipe ***** and well never happen.

Thanks for the link. I'll take a look at this and post my opinion.

Just to put it out there: When I read of any kind of government budget crises where they suspend "non-essential" services and staff, I bristle. If it's non-essential why is does it have to be something the government has to provide? Can't that likely be contracted out?
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
A trap? I suppose if you don't know all the particulars about the issue then you would see a simple question asking which poison you are willing to accept as a trap.

But...those are the issues at hand despite the fact that G:clown:pers won't say it and Demos are to stupid to make the point for some reason.

PS...next time just say you don't know enough about the issue to make an intelligent response.:2 cents:

Now go ahead and come back with the ubiquitous 'why are you quoting me', 'you are just insulting me' ...or whatever blah blah blah..can't defend my point team anti Hot Mega response...:1orglaugh

so whats the answer genious?
looks like your claiming to know.

i said yesterday and today that i believe in smaller government and less taxes.
for some reason that bothers some people.
i also said neither party gives a **** and are in bed with each other, which the paragraph i highlighted above seems to back up.

i get 10,000 words of **** from one guy and now youre gonna jump on it.

b-bye
have fun .
 
so whats the answer genious?
looks like your claiming to know.

i said yesterday and today that i believe in smaller government and less taxes.
i also said neither party gives a **** and are in bed with each other, which the paragraph i highlighted above seems to back up.

i get 10,000 words of **** from one guy and now youre gonna jump on it.

b-bye
have fun .

Uhhhh...I guess..whatever the fuck that was suppose to mean (unintelligible nonresponse).

The answer is to let the tax cuts on the 'rich' expire....ESPECIALLY since a majority of "them" support the policy in order to help the country.
 
Top