Sasha Grey lands role in Entourage

Let's not wordsmith. If we both understand that selling records by an individual performer is about more than just the relative ability to sing..what's the point of implying she can't sing if but to suggest also that she isn't talented?:dunno:

Especially since the subject is "talent".

Wordsmithing? No, I wasn't playing semantics. My initial quote mentioned singing directly.

I reacted to you calling her talented, not to her getting work. Britney Spears sold a shit load of CDs...that doesn't make her a good singer.

There's no backpedaling there. It's called an analogy. I clearly stated analogy. There's absolutely nothing there indicating that I think Spears is devoid of talent.

Anyway, you still haven't mentioned where you've seen Sasha's talent. When I mentioned her acting "ability", you thought I was referring to her porn vids. Now your judging the potential of her ability based on the poor acting in a bad movie that I assume you haven't seen??

Obviously you and I have drawn different conclusions on her ability. It is very important for an actor to be properly cast and have a worthy story and script. That's why most don't take on every script and role.

We've seen time and time and time and time again where an artist of any stripe performs a role where the casting and script doesn't benefit their talent. Singers are asked to perform songs that don't suit their talents.

Properly cast? In The GF Experience, she played a 22 year old whore. What better casting does she need? Anyway, I've seen plenty of good actors in shitty rolls and shitty movies. No matter how poorly matched, I can't recall spending 90 minutes being entirely distracted over how ice cold, monotonous and unbelievable a performance is.

She was given the script, she chose to star in it and if she couldn't deliver because the stars hadn't lined up perfectly and she wasn't committed to it (which she claims she entirely was) then she simply doesn't have the chops.

I've never seen so many excuses over something so trivial. I'm happy for her success and I hope she'll prove the naysayers wrong in time, but so far, her reel leaves a lot to be desired and her talent really needs to be proven.
 
Wordsmithing? No, I wasn't playing semantics. My initial quote mentioned singing directly.

There's no backpedaling there. It's called an analogy. I clearly stated analogy. There's absolutely nothing there indicating that I think Spears is devoid of talent.
We were discussing talent and you stated Spears' record sales essentially aren't proof of her ability to sing (a talent). And when I said she IS talented...I wasn't even refuting whether you said she was or not. I was making my own affirmative statement on it.

Either way it's neither here nor there.

Anyway, you still haven't mentioned where you've seen Sasha's talent. When I mentioned her acting "ability", you thought I was referring to her porn vids. Now your judging the potential of her ability based on the poor acting in a bad movie that I assume you haven't seen??

Properly cast? In The GF Experience, she played a 22 year old whore. What better casting does she need? Anyway, I've seen plenty of good actors in shitty rolls and shitty movies. No matter how poorly matched, I can't recall spending 90 minutes being entirely distracted over how ice cold, monotonous and unbelievable a performance is.

She was given the script, she chose to star in it and if she couldn't deliver because the stars hadn't lined up perfectly and she wasn't committed to it (which she claims she entirely was) then she simply doesn't have the chops.

I've never seen so many excuses over something so trivial. I'm happy for her success and I hope she'll prove the naysayers wrong in time, but so far, her reel leaves a lot to be desired and her talent really needs to be proven.

We basically have a disagreement on whether she is talented enough be a credible actor.

What makes me think she has talent?? Well, I can't show you through my eyes the anecdotal evidence I see. No more than anyone else who judges something as nebulous as "talent" or skill. But I would just say the evidence is obviously there (though not determinative) that she is showing something to someone since she continues to be looked at for mainstream roles.
 
We basically have a disagreement on whether she is talented enough be a credible actor.

What makes me think she has talent?? Well, I can't show you through my eyes the anecdotal evidence I see. No more than anyone else who judges something as nebulous as "talent" or skill. But I would just say the evidence is obviously there (though not determinative) that she is showing something to someone since she continues to be looked at for mainstream roles.

I still don't quite get it. I suppose if one of my favorite adult stars was venturing into new territory, I'd want to see them succeed and might even trick myself into think there's something there that isn't. Maybe. I just don't think I'd go on record and claim I see a talent that I've yet to see a good example of. The je ne sais quoi reasoning is hard to defend.

Anyway, she's young and seems bright enough to know that there's ways to improve. So maybe some day she'll actually posses enough talent in order to prove whether or not a porn star can truly cross over if the skills are there.
 
I still don't quite get it. I suppose if one of my favorite adult stars was venturing into new territory, I'd want to see them succeed and might even trick myself into think there's something there that isn't. Maybe. I just don't think I'd go on record and claim I see a talent that I've yet to see a good example of. The je ne sais quoi reasoning is hard to defend.

Anyway, she's young and seems bright enough to know that there's ways to improve. So maybe some day she'll actually posses enough talent in order to prove whether or not a porn star can truly cross over if the skills are there.

Actually, Je ne sais quoi...is as hard to defend as it would be to challenge. As talent is not as tangible to be proven for or against.

Frankly...you have it exactly the wrong way...I want her to stay in porn where I know she displays exceptional talent. I only theorize with my novice eye that she can transfer her natural charisma and presence to mainstream.

I mean, it doesn't benefit me for one of the best young porn starlets to become a below average mainstream performer. Don't think it benefits anyone unless someone is making an undue amount of money on the transition.

As far as going on record and claiming talent as yet seen...it happens all the time..

There is a reason why people send scouts out to discover new talent and brokers recommend stocks before they pay off.

But back to the topic...Sasha Grey is getting another mainstream role....
 
Actually, Je ne sais quoi...is as hard to defend as it would be to challenge. As talent is not as tangible to be proven for or against.

Frankly...you have it exactly the wrong way...I want her to stay in porn where I know she displays exceptional talent. I only theorize with my novice eye that she can transfer her natural charisma and presence to mainstream.

I mean, it doesn't benefit me for one of the best young porn starlets to become a below average mainstream performer. Don't think it benefits anyone unless someone is making an undue amount of money on the transition.

As far as going on record and claiming talent as yet seen...it happens all the time..

There is a reason why people send scouts out to discover new talent and brokers recommend stocks before they pay off.

Talent scouts typically look for two things; an aesthetic appeal and actual examples of talent. Aesthetic appeal is not a talent.

Sure there's examples of people looking for some pretty little thing to mold into a star, but I imagine there's a very small success rate in that. Pamela Anderson was found that way, however, I've yet to hear any positive comments about her acting chops. I can only imagine how many attractive people were whisked into potential Hollywood careers only learn that they aren't capable of ever delivering the goods and developing the talent.

Still, and again, my argument is that Sasha has been given opportunities to prove herself and, in my opinion, she's failed. I'm not sure how much this diamond needs to be polished off before we see the shine.

As far as her "talent" in the adult film world, I can't argue. I'm not a big fan of the shock stuff and I've never considered getting fucked a talent, but many do so I suppose there's good reason for it. I'm not sure that's the kind of talent that crosses over, however.
 
I just love her because she's a nasty, nasty girl, but The Girlfriend Experience was FUCKING BORING.
 
Talent scouts typically look for two things; an aesthetic appeal and actual examples of talent. Aesthetic appeal is not a talent.

Sure there's examples of people looking for some pretty little thing to mold into a star, but I imagine there's a very small success rate in that. Pamela Anderson was found that way, however, I've yet to hear any positive comments about her acting chops. I can only imagine how many attractive people were whisked into potential Hollywood careers only learn that they aren't capable of ever delivering the goods and developing the talent.

Still, and again, my argument is that Sasha has been given opportunities to prove herself and, in my opinion, she's failed. I'm not sure how much this diamond needs to be polished off before we see the shine.

As far as her "talent" in the adult film world, I can't argue. I'm not a big fan of the shock stuff and I've never considered getting fucked a talent, but many do so I suppose there's good reason for it. I'm not sure that's the kind of talent that crosses over, however.

Not all actors are virtuosos nor does the industry require every actor be a virtuoso.

There are some scripts and stories some actors are credible with (no matter who they are) and some they are not.

It's much more than the simplistic notion a chick fucks in porn so a story about a call girl should naturally fit her style of acting. That's as simple as thinking a chick who looks hot with big tits can be a good porn star.

Again, she has a natural charisma and presence...and I'm certain that is what continues to get her noticed by those who want her in mainstream movies.

It is instantly noticeable when you watch her speak in various settings.
 
Not all actors are virtuosos nor does the industry require every actor be a virtuoso.

There are some scripts and stories some actors are credible with (no matter who they are) and some they are not.

It's much more than the simplistic notion a chick fucks in porn so a story about a call girl should naturally fit her style of acting. That's a simple as thinking a chick who looks hot with big tits can be a good porn star.

Again, she has a natural charisma and presence...and I'm certain that is what continues to get her noticed by those who want her in mainstream movies.

It is instantly noticeable when you watch her speak in various settings.

I never claimed actors need to be virtuosos. They just need to be believable in a roll. They need to be able to act well enough for people to forget that they're acting.

Sasha may be charming as all get out (I don't see it myself) but she doesn't yet posses that ability.

Anyway, the reason Soderbergh claims that he cast Sasha was because of her career and experience. Sure, that doesn't mean that she's a natural at acting like a whore just because she is one, but Sasha and Soderbergh both gushed about how it was such perfect, natural marriage between actor and roll. In any event, the roll really didn't require all that much. She wasn't saddled with heaps of tedious dialog or a wide range of emotion. If anything, it was a pretty elementary entry level roll and, even if it wasn't, it's not an excuse to come off as completely removed from the scene or just plain dead behind the eyes.

But I'll let you have the last word because the beauty of all this is simply watching her work will determine whether she's a talented actress or not.



Also, The Girlfriend Experience is on NetFlix Instant if anybody's curious.
 
I never claimed actors need to be virtuosos. They just need to be believable in a roll. They need to be able to act well enough for people to forget that they're acting.

Sasha may be charming as all get out (I don't see it myself) but she doesn't yet posses that ability.

Anyway, the reason Soderbergh claims that he cast Sasha was because of her career and experience. Sure, that doesn't mean that she's a natural at acting like a whore just because she is one, but Sasha and Soderbergh both gushed about how it was such perfect, natural marriage between actor and roll. In any event, the roll really didn't require all that much. She wasn't saddled with heaps of tedious dialog or a wide range of emotion. If anything, it was a pretty elementary entry level roll and, even if it wasn't, it's not an excuse to come off as completely removed from the scene or just plain dead behind the eyes.

But I'll let you have the last word because the beauty of all this is simply watching her work will determine whether she's a talented actress or not.

Also, The Girlfriend Experience is on NetFlix Instant if anybody's curious.

Soderbergh says he was impressed by a piece on her he read. That's what interested him in her specifically as opposed to all the of the other hot pieces of ass in porn.

Again, there is much much more to a scene or movie coming off well than the talent of an actor. That's what you pay directors for. They determine how lines are delivered and what the scene is designed to convey, etc.

Most people know you can't really judge an actor on a C or D rated movie per se.

The complexity of a role has nothing to do with amount of lines. I has to do with the kind of person you expect the character to create in a viewer's mind.

A role could have 3 lines in an entire movie. That doesn't mean the character isn't complex in what he/she conveys to the viewer. (The whole picture is worth a thousand words thing...that concept).

As she gets more roles and steadies her footing we'll see.
 
Lalilu should shot his piehole

Roger Ebert said she was good in GFE. I think he knows a lot more then you do about good performances in movies;)

And GFE even got decent reviews so her acting couldn't be that bad.
 

LukeEl

I am a failure to the Korean side of my family
Yeah good for her, honestly I keep finding her vastly overrated when it comes to porn.
 
Congrats to Sasha landing that role, She was great in "The Girlfriend Experience" and her knowledge of movies is fucking amazing.

Wow A hot girl who loves sex and movies. Sounds like a win to me
 
Top