claydavis
Major Crimes? Shiiiit.
Rachel in Can He Score.
http://www.bangbrosnetwork.com/t1/intro.htm?s=bd9116
http://www.bangbrosnetwork.com/t1/intro.htm?s=bd9116
Rachel Starr
- Thread starter abbruzi
- Start date
It's a free country dude. I was merely addressing assertions that were disingenuous at best......comments that Rachel herself saw necessary to address as well.
claydavis
Major Crimes? Shiiiit.
OMFG, again please do your research before you speak! the likelihood of anyone catching HIV, from a BJ or pussy eating is .0001%. furthermore, it has NEVER been proven to be contracted orally anyway. they think because the saliva and stomach acids kill it, but that's not proven either. that's why it's still aloud. but just to be clear on where i stand, i wouldn't swallow cum just to be safe on the safe side.....
I did do research. There's not much on this except for a few outbreaks. The one big one I heard was the Lara Roxx outbreak, but that was basically it. I figured, just 1 or 2 outbreaks here and there is nothing. But you said it yourself.... they hide these outbreaks. How am I supposed to know if they are hidden from me? And if there are more outbreaks than I'm aware of, I'm surprised 99% of female performers choose not to use condoms.
As for the oral sex thing. I did research and they all said that one can contract STDs and HIV that way, so it is recommended that people use condoms during oral sex. It wasn't the swallowing that is causing HIV transmission, but by simply having a cut or sore in the mouth. But anyways, I didn't know that the chances of contracting anything were lower. Here's an example of the "research" I did.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/oralsex.htm
So you can see why I'd be misinformed. So, I really do apologize if I came on too strong and if I've offended you. If you're still upset with me, I can totally understand. But I am sorry.
BTW- I still think you're beautiful.
No. Only a blowbang with 3 guys in "Rachels Choice"
I haven't been here in awhile. Saw an old scene of hers and thought I'd see the news, and I was pretty shocked to hear about condoms. End of the day, it's her choice, even though pornstars ironically are cleaner than your average sexually active Joe on the street. If it means the end of creampies and open mouth facials it would be extremely sad - she is one of the hottest pornstars.
It's just funny, one rare outbreak from an actor who is hiding, compared to the millions of HIV cases you hear about everyday, yet the 1 case in porn will get overexposure. There's a risk with everything but with stringent testing in porn, it's so minute it's like being afraid to fly. Can planes crash? Of course, but 99% of people could fly in a plane everyday and never even have to do an emergency landing.
Her decision, it's just a shame and kind of puts me off watching. Still gorgeous to see blowjobs though.
It's just funny, one rare outbreak from an actor who is hiding, compared to the millions of HIV cases you hear about everyday, yet the 1 case in porn will get overexposure. There's a risk with everything but with stringent testing in porn, it's so minute it's like being afraid to fly. Can planes crash? Of course, but 99% of people could fly in a plane everyday and never even have to do an emergency landing.
Her decision, it's just a shame and kind of puts me off watching. Still gorgeous to see blowjobs though.
That's exactly what I thought before. But if you read Rachel's reply to my posts, you will see that the porn industry hides a lot of stuff from us. We only hear 5% of what's going on. There's probably more to this than what we're aware of. It kind of makes me wonder why I see some porn stars (such as Taylor Rain) suddenly disappear and retire.
See now you're just guessing and making assumptions. But the topic is beaten to death. It's just some of Rachel's best scenes couldn't be achieved by having a condom on. For example her epic scene in "smothered and covered" which is enough to make your knees melt.
I am pretty sure if the problem was anything bit significant #1 myself and others would be aware #2 no-one can cover up anything large forever. People like to latch on to paranoia and blow things out of proportion. I am not saying it doesn't exist, of course there's risk in anything involving sex but not @ the level some conspiracy theorists make it out to be. If you're going to wear condoms during oral sex, sex, paranoid about cum in the mouth then imo what's the point? I am talking in general here, not aimed @ Rachel. I can handle condoms during intercourse, that's ok, not a preference because it feels less "raw", but the abstaining from the other things I mentioned = I and a lot of people have no interest.
On a light note, I am still laughing @ the poor guy in Rachel's last scene. He got mauled. Rachel gets hotter with age.
But the topic is beaten to death. It's just some of Rachel's best scenes couldn't be achieved by having a condom on. For example her epic scene in "smothered and covered" which is enough to make your knees melt.I am pretty sure if the problem was anything bit significant #1 myself and others would be aware #2 no-one can cover up anything large forever. People like to latch on to paranoia and blow things out of proportion. I am not saying it doesn't exist, of course there's risk in anything involving sex but not @ the level some conspiracy theorists make it out to be. If you're going to wear condoms during oral sex, sex, paranoid about cum in the mouth then imo what's the point? I am talking in general here, not aimed @ Rachel. I can handle condoms during intercourse, that's ok, not a preference because it feels less "raw", but the abstaining from the other things I mentioned = I and a lot of people have no interest.
On a light note, I am still laughing @ the poor guy in Rachel's last scene. He got mauled.
Rachel gets hotter with age.
condoms or not...i dont care..i just wana see the beautiful/oustanding/perfect Rachel Starr have sex
I second that all the way! I'd give my left leg to do a scene with her.
Amputee porn. Kinky.
Perhaps Rachel herself can clarify. In that link you posted, Rachel is having sex with a condom. Then when it's time for the guy to cum, he removes the condom and lets him ejaculate on her anus and pussy. Who knows how much leaked in? Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of using the condom?
Again, excuse me if I'm asking an ignorant question, but I'm just trying to figure this out.
all porn stars are required to have a clean std panel before they can shoot (without a condom) correct? so my guess is that the male performer in that video had a clean std panel and rachel was yet to get hers done. so HE is the one that is trying to stay safe. so when he takes his condom off to shoot his load it doesn't matter because he is clean. that's my guess anyways
Im no expert in the porn business,but I think Rachel would have to have clean STD panel too,to even shoot a scene. It would only make sense have two clean performers since both people probably shoot multiple scenes in one day.
Re: What do u want 2 know about Rachel Starr?
http://www.freepornofreeporn.com/fr...isbgdb_t230.html?be0051:PAYPERTRIAL35:ELEGANT
http://www.freepornofreeporn.com/fr...isbgdb_t230.html?be0051:PAYPERTRIAL35:ELEGANT
