here is something interesting about Obama:
There's another controversy brewing similar to the Rev. Wright controversy.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news/35130-obama-seeks-silence-ad-tying-him-60s-radical.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m89m0pC_bpY&eurl=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxoiZdBSi-g
Also:
"During the time (1999 to 2002) that Obama was a director, the Woods Fund made generous contributions to an Arab group founded by Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi, a supporter of the PLO while it was labeled by the U.S. State Department as a terror group, and another host of an Obama fundraiser. The group in question, the Arab American Action Network, subscribes to the idea that the establishment of the state of Israel is a Nakba, a catastrophe."
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.780/pub_detail.asp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvdAWJ3tyR0&feature=related anti semitic obama
Let's not forget Obama's terrorist connections with William Ayers and sympathy for the PLO and for Luis Farrakhan.
Hmmmm.... They'll have to draw a stronger connection than that to convince me. The statement in the video " Obama on Ayers: "...respectable..." and "...mainstream..." Quoting two individual words by Obama! Are they freakin kidding me? For all I know Obama could've said "Ayers had on a respectable suit and fell in the main stream". The creator of these videos has obviously been taking lessons from Michael Moore. We need a full quote for this not to be blatant propaganda. We at least need to have something substantial to evaluate.
So far this is right up there with the BS claim that McCain believes $5M is middle class. Any idiot who wants to take this out of context without any respect for the original quote or the original video can do that as well.
I don't think pro-choice people believe that a fetus that is "imperfect" should be aborted.
You are right. Many don't. but some do.
From his earlier quote it did appear as if No_Man thought this way.
(His choice of name creates an ironic contradiction
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
)
And even those people who don't believe this "should" happen, may be acting / voting in such a way that it "can" happen, leading in some cases for people like silent_blue or meesterperfect's loved one not to be allowed to live.
I think they just believe that a woman should have the right to make the decision for herself about whether or not she chooses to go through 9 months of pregnancy and then raise a child. Perfect or not.
Again you are probably right. This is important.
Yet even many people who support a woman's ability to terminate a pregnancy do not see it as balanced and humane to extend this procedure to the entire 9 months.
Those people apparently take issue with the fact that Obama believes (and actively voted) that a child can be born alive and viable and terminated by being stabbed in the base of his/her skull at such a late stage in his/her development. (partial birth abortion)
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=231294&highlight=abortion
Perhaps it's not entirely fair to characterize all such people as right-wing religious nuts (not saying you did this) or that this is a "non-issue" and voters should just "ignore it" and "move-on". IMHO I think it is fair for this issue to be included in the discussion of a president's morals and judgment regardless of any single individual's personal views on the subject.
To be fair she has some experience. Palin when from the mayor of a town of 9,000 to two years as governor of Alaska, a state that has fewer citizens than Cincinnati, Ohio ...
C'mon. Is that fair? Alaska has about the same number of people as Delaware. Who's from Delaware? Oh.. That's right, Democratic VP candidate Joe Biden. Didn't hear people highlighting the relevance of his small state. Besides her experience is executive experience, unlike Biden.
Isn't Biden too old (yeah right), will he be too old in 4 years?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
Isn't he a Washington insider?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
Wasn't Obama's lack of Washington experience supposed to be an advantage because he's running on the strength of his values and ideas?
Double standard?
Some of the things McCain most likely admires about Sarah Palin:
* She has a history of fighting wasteful spending and high taxes
* She followed through on her campaign promises to reduce her own salary, and to reduce property taxes by 40%
* She resigned in protest from position as Ethics Commissioner of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission over the "lack of ethics" of fellow Alaskan Republican leaders and was a whistleblower on the convicted commisioners
* She fought Ted Stevens on his $398 million "pork" bridge to nowhere
*etc...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin
Many people praise Obama's Democratic Nomination acceptance speech. Some have even said it is the best political speech ever. Sometimes, I wonder, did people really listen to it? Didn't he talk about rising above partisan politics of the past? Aren't we "together under the same proud flag...not ... a Red America or a Blue America (but) the United States of America?" Should this be reduced to merely high flying rhetoric?
Shouldn't his supporters be more respectful of Sarah Palin's accomplishments? Her integrity to do what is right? - for all Americans, not just those in her own political party?
To his credit Obama himself hasn't yet attacked Sarah Palin's credentials or experience.
Does Obama have a history of reaching across the aisle? (he has voted with his own party 98% of the time -CNN) Whose interests will he have in mind when he "goes through the federal budget line by line" given that he has a history of accepting $300 million in pork earmarks (USAToday)
http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/06/obama-reveals-h.html
to slip in funding for his pet projects back home in Chicago.
Obama is now calling for transparency on earmarks (as McCain* has done for years) which is good, but what does Obama's actual track record show? It is one thing to say you can reach across the aisle to bring Democrats and Republicans together, it is one thing to say you will fight corruption and bureaucracy in government - It is quite another to have actually done it.
*McCain is one of five senators to reject earmarks entirely