Police: Body found appears to be missing porn star

I've heard of pornstars being killed in car accidents or killed by a medical condition "Lea DeMea" of Brain Cancer (which really disappointed me) and "Chloe Jones" of a liver problem...

But I've never heard of a pornstar being murdered before..
 
Out of all the people in the world you could murder... why a pornstar...?

I hope the killer goes off to prison and "personally" finds out what convicts do when they can't look at porn.
 
I think they have porn in a lot of prisons, actually. I know magazine subscriptions are very high in some prisons.

Of all the people you could murder... why murder at all?

Most murders are comitted in a crime of passion (heat of the moment) by someone known to the victim. If that holds up for this case too, then her porno involvement probably had nothing to do with it. Maybe just a fight between lovers. Who knows.

Many pornstars also escort. Perhaps he rented her for the hour, but something happened. Who knows. I guess we'll find out.

I was referring to gang rape. Since there arent any women in prison, they have to have something else to bang... Jerking off isnt enough for them anymore... so they bang each other.

Just think of it as another reason to respect the law...
 
Last edited:
I heard the local authorities might have been the ones that gave out the fact she was on the Internet. I wonder why they would do that if they though it had nothing to do with the case.

Maybe that gives us some idea of what SOME (take it easy!) of the cops are doing when they take their donuts and coffee back to the office. They moisten a donut with some warm coffee, turn on the internet porn, and "protect and serve" us!

:1orglaugh
 
Maybe that gives us some idea of what SOME (take it easy!) of the cops are doing when they take their donuts and coffee back to the office. They moisten a donut with some warm coffee, turn on the internet porn, and "protect and serve" us!

:1orglaugh

Oh come on... That is so stereotypical...

They would get fired for that anyways
 
Oh come on, please. Some people believe in the death penalty, I say that supporting it makes us accessory to murder and there is never an excuse for murder, especially state sponsored murder.

But whatever you believe about that, you say he deserves to die cause he killed a hot young porn star, fair enough, that's your opinion, I say give him 20 years in jail. But you think that having a 16 year old pregnant girlfriend makes him somehow more hate-able or more guilty? Like hell! 16 is old enough for most things in most states and most countries, and is certainly legal in most of the midwest, just because this guy has a pregnant partner who is a teenager doesn't make him any more despicable or any less despicable, it's completely irrelavant. You know nothing about him or his girl or his baby to be, all you know is, he killed a woman, and it was a disgusting thing to do, and he should be punished accordingly. End of story. It's disrespectful to use someone's very recent death to try and prove moral points (that 24 year olds who get 16 year olds pregnant should be punished, even if it's legal). But each to their own I guess.

Hey, Fox - you again??!! haha.

Anyway....I agree wholeheartedly with your first paragraph. No state-sponsored murder, no death penalty.

But I also gotta say, sorry, I wholeheartedly disagree with your idea of giving him "20 years." Look, if she was MURDERED then the person who committed her MURDER should be deprived of his/her freedom for the rest of their relevant life. At the very least the murderer should remain behind bars (without the state buying him any porn magazines, either!) until he is a decrepit, old, bed-ridden man who poses no physical threat to anyone. Then, if his family wants to care for him, fine, he can have parole at 86, assuming he lives that long. But otherwise, he should not get the life and freedom he took from this girl... (and yes, of COURSE, every suspect is innocent until proven guilty) 20 years for intentionally taking someone else's life is an insulting slap on the wrist, and I think when you say this it really hurts the cause to eliminate the death penalty - it plays right into the hands of those who are saying that anti-death-penalty crusaders don't take crime seriously and don't respect or care about crime victims. I mean, what, are you open to 15, 10, or 5 year prison terms for murderers??

When one murders another human being, there needs to be both a protective aspect to the punishment - keep him/her away from society to protect other possible victims - and a measure of retribution, for the life that was lost. Sander ("Zane") has no future, no life, and likely had a horrific end to her short life. Putting the murderer in a cell for the rest of his life is a fair response.

:2 cents:
 
Oh come on, please. Some people believe in the death penalty, I say that supporting it makes us accessory to murder and there is never an excuse for murder, especially state sponsored murder.

Dude. Your opinion is he should be killed. My opinion is nobody should be killed. We're both just as entitled. You can't tell people who don't agree with you not to talk. Free speech.

What about considering the death penalty for someone like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed? The only reason we keep him alive is so he can talk...
 
Answer these if you can then...

If prison is such a good punishment, then why do most people who have been to prison end up going back to prison?

In Britain there is a major problem with over crowding in prisons. Hence why most prisoners are been let out as little as a quarter into their sentence. What the solution?
(And building more isn't a option as there is no money to build it or continue to fund it once it was built)

What is and how do you punish a murderer without the death sentence and with your prisons already overcrowded?
 
No. Murder is murder. Civilized people lock up criminals for a set amount of time in relation to what they have done. Vengeful neanderthals exact revenge by murdering criminals. That makes them murderers. I don't give a shit who it is. But why not start another thread on him, or it, or whatever. Bush has killed more than KSM, indirectly. Shall we kill him too, or keep him alive so he can talk?

Don't tell me what I can and can't say. You're a fascist dictator if you do. :D

You make me laugh...

Im a facist dictator...

Two questions... "That makes them murderers" "What" makes murdering a mass murderer a bad thing? What would you feel like if somebody murdered a direct relative of yours?

Americans save more lives than they take, stop bashing them.
 
The reason I told you not to say 9/11 was a conspiracy is because I have to put up with those people alot. And believe me... they are idiots...

Speaking of that... If you were the president, how would you respond to an event like 9/11? Would you let them get away with it?

Btw this thread is getting extremely off topic
 
I've heard of pornstars being killed in car accidents or killed by a medical condition "Lea DeMea" of Brain Cancer (which really disappointed me) and "Chloe Jones" of a liver problem...

But I've never heard of a pornstar being murdered before..

Vanessa Freeman - strangled.
Taylor Summers - stabbed
Charli Waters
Billy London - mutilated
Christopher Lance - stabbed
Riny Red
Lolo Ferrari - suspected murder, nothing proved.

http://rame.net/faq/deadporn/
 
Answer these if you can then...

If prison is such a good punishment, then why do most people who have been to prison end up going back to prison?

In Britain there is a major problem with over crowding in prisons. Hence why most prisoners are been let out as little as a quarter into their sentence. What the solution?
(And building more isn't a option as there is no money to build it or continue to fund it once it was built)

What is and how do you punish a murderer without the death sentence and with your prisons already overcrowded?

Poggy since your in the UK and have not had a death penalty for quite some time I would like to make a couple of points that as an american who lives in a country with the death penalty I am aware of.If you don't have enough money for more prisons you really don't have the money for executions then if you use us as a guide.It costs significantly more here to execute someone than to put them in prison for life.Some may argue thst well take away their rights to appeals that the courts required and it would be cheaper but thankfully most of us would not support that so that is the reality now and will be in the future.2nd are you aware of something here called the "Innoncence project" which is a group pf lawyers who have gotten something like 150 people off of death row and released from prison by proving they were wrongly convicted using DNA to clear them.Innocent people sentenced to die is not acceptable.Plus their are study's and evidence minorities disproportiantely and discriminatorily are subject to death sentences.It always amazes me here in the US that the same people who say govt is corrupt and wastefull are willing to think they can be trusted with life and death.
 

maildude

Postal Paranoiac
I heard this on the radio last night. Tragedy. :( A lot of her stuff online has been pulled already.
 
Poggy, I dunno man. All I know is that the UN and all the humanitarian organizations condemn executions, and so do I. It just feels very wrong to be part of a system that kills people if they are "bad" enough. That feels like a brutal and medieval system to me. I couldn't care less how much it costs. I don't give a flying shit, you know why, cause you and I live in two of the richest countries on the planet, and they can take the money from these illegal wars, and do whatever the hell they want with it, so if you want to complain about wasted money, let's start with the wars as they waste infinitely more money than any domestic policies ever have.

Fox

Err...no they don't. Isn't America in the UN?

And don't some states still have executions?

And I believe they aren't the only members of the UN who still have execution as a sentence either.

So how can the UN be against it?
 
Err...no they don't. Isn't America in the UN?

And don't some states still have executions?

And I believe they aren't the only members of the UN who still have execution as a sentence either.

So how can the UN be against it?

While only some states use the death penalty all still have it on the books.Actually my state of NJ going of off a commision set up to study it is now moving to be the 1st state to abolish it.And just being a memeber of the UN does not mean you are required to follow its lead.You are correct that other countries still have executions but none of them are the so-called civilized ones like we claim we are.
 
Err... yes they do. The UN leaders and human rights comissions have publicly criticized America many times for being a world leader and "setting an example" of human rights, and yet still persisting in state sponsored executions. A lot of other nations also have the death penalty, but not the self-professed examples of civilized developed nations such as America. It's happened many, many times. We can discuss it on a death penalty thread further.

But isn't that double standards then Fox.

As they still allow the US to be a member of the UN. You can say your against something as much as you want. But if you are allowing them to be in the loop. Then are you really against it?

Only answer to that is no!
 
Top