Performer Guide Netvideogirls.com

i typed in stephanie blaze without even thinking. she was erica on 3 separate videos. chalk that up to a brain fart.

the girl pictured in your confused images is bridgette. all the tube sites have a short version of her video, but if you did a little u can find the full one that clocks in at 33:35. thought she was IDed in this thread but cant seem to find it right now. perhaps i'll get some time to look tomorrow.
 
Actually does anybody know where there would be a list of all the threesome's from this site? Or perhaps we could start one hahaha!
 
Any ideas who this Tiffany girl is? Can't find her elsewhere :crying:

tiffany.jpg
 
.
Thank you kindly for your attachment explanation, Jander711. I guess I'm out of luck, because I rarely travel to the NVG web site... being hit with a million mini-images confuses me. Aside from the Freeones "legality" issue regarding frame grabs (I've never been called on it, and I wouldn't worry; there is something called a "Fair Use" law that should offer protection), I feel anyone interested in an actress would know if a big, clear close-up is presented. But at least I am gratefui you are putting up some pictorial reference, which is so important. (I may need to improve my Clint Eastwood impression, and squint more.)

Please allow me to thank you in earnest for answering my "Confused" question, Sweetmullet. (I did run a thread search for "Confused" - the only clue I had to go by - before asking my question. I ran a "Bridgette" search now, and the only other post coming up is a month-old one by Member Nvgfan, who wondered whether Bridgette has done anything else.)

I'm also grateful for your suggestion as to how I may go about finding the full version, but I kept running into removal after removal.

Wading into tube site territory can be treacherous, getting hit by waves of distractions. I ran into an apparently new NVG effort featuring a blond lass who seemed to have laryngitis (from the five-minute clip; I tried to see if she was referred to by name, of course), which was an interesting angle... making her somewhat more vulnerable (too bad she is tattooed). At any rate, her written "name" boiled down to "Nervous.' (Perhaps a cousin of "Confused.") Would anyone be aware of her character's name, to help me possibly track down the full-lengther? (As always, if you happen to know her "real" name, all the better.)

netvideogirls nervous.jpg

(I ran a hopeless thread search for "nervous," so if the lady has already been covered here, do forgive me.)


.
 
Hi Know-way. Just wanted to say that your picture of Melonie is not the same girl Mellonie Monroe. But I remember the one you posted as well. She went all the way. The one I'm talking about left just as it was getting good. I cannot find a screenshot of her from NVG but she is definitely this girl.
Mellanie-Monroe-karups-older-women-13.jpg

Gina the goth, AKA Violet Skye (not the one this will link to) is this girl.
violetskye_f_violet%20skye%20littlebratz3.jpg.jpg

promo_2.jpg
 
.
So I blew it with not just one, but two of Jabber09's I.D.'s... Gina and Melonie, when I provided my pictures to help others know who they are. What were the odds of that?

This is why pictures are so important. (And thank you, Jander711, for the clarifying pictures you provided. Ahhhh, what a difference they make, when they are big and clear.)

So what were the chances of two NVG performers having the same peculiarly spelled name, "Melonie"?

When I checked my Melonie, keeping in mind Jabber09's description of her having a phone call and splitting, I was fast-forwarding and noticed her leaving in the first part of the video, with a phone in her hand (while her back was turned on the way out). I thought that confirmed it. But on closer look (a one-word site called Ero.profile features the full video for those interested; Googling "netvideogirls melonie" gets it on top of the listings), I now see she left with some tension, not because of a phone call, and then when she returns, she goes into this "I want you" act, and our boy tries to calm her down. It's kind of humorous.

I am familiar with the actress who played the other Melonie, that I had no idea appeared on NVG. The spelling of her name, though, is not "Mellonie Monroe," but "Mellanie Monroe." (Her IAFD page gives us other spelling variations.)

I found no reference for Mellanie's Melonie on NVG, but I did run into a THIRD NVG "Melonie," purportedly from 2004:

netvideogirls Melonie 2004.jpg

Obviously the vast array of actresses appearing on Net Video Girls has become a bottomless pit.

I can see my Gine ("Gina J.") is a different Gina than the one in the pictures kindly provided by Jander711, and the one featured in the video that Jabber09 pointed to. (Boy the guy in this video is pretty gutsy, using no condom with a girl who doesn't appear all that responsible.) This other Gina is a little prettier, I thought, and at least has no smorgasbord of tattoos on her front.

I finally did locate a non-streaming download for "Confused" Bridgette, by the way, and it was a worthwhile viewing, as she has an innocence. But the abrupt cuts... there was no smooth transition in several parts of the video. Why would this be? Is it possible that some of these are not faked..? (Or am I being gullible, again...)

.
 
This was an amazing scene, but can't seem to find the model. Who is Paola?

http://netvideogirls.com/nvg/tour2/play.php?id=14_paula

.
Thank you kindly for your attachment explanation, Jander711. I guess I'm out of luck, because I rarely travel to the NVG web site... being hit with a million mini-images confuses me. Aside from the Freeones "legality" issue regarding frame grabs (I've never been called on it, and I wouldn't worry; there is something called a "Fair Use" law that should offer protection), I feel anyone interested in an actress would know if a big, clear close-up is presented. But at least I am gratefui you are putting up some pictorial reference, which is so important. (I may need to improve my Clint Eastwood impression, and squint more.)

Please allow me to thank you in earnest for answering my "Confused" question, Sweetmullet. (I did run a thread search for "Confused" - the only clue I had to go by - before asking my question. I ran a "Bridgette" search now, and the only other post coming up is a month-old one by Member Nvgfan, who wondered whether Bridgette has done anything else.)

I'm also grateful for your suggestion as to how I may go about finding the full version, but I kept running into removal after removal.

Wading into tube site territory can be treacherous, getting hit by waves of distractions. I ran into an apparently new NVG effort featuring a blond lass who seemed to have laryngitis (from the five-minute clip; I tried to see if she was referred to by name, of course), which was an interesting angle... making her somewhat more vulnerable (too bad she is tattooed). At any rate, her written "name" boiled down to "Nervous.' (Perhaps a cousin of "Confused.") Would anyone be aware of her character's name, to help me possibly track down the full-lengther? (As always, if you happen to know her "real" name, all the better.)

View attachment 379756

(I ran a hopeless thread search for "nervous," so if the lady has already been covered here, do forgive me.)


.

the girl you called "nervous" is Marsha on the nvg site. also saw her on a another site where she took part in a threesome (2 girl kind), maybe it was gfrevenge. i cant seem to find it now.
not sure which video she says it in but she has vocal chord damage and that is her voice all the time.
 
.
Regarding "Nervous" Marsha, that's another one I owe you, dear Sweetmullet. You are a very good man.

You also quoted Member Lynx41's question "Who is Paola?" as though poised to answer, but made no remark. I clicked on Lynx41's link to the NVG site - hadn't visited in a long time - and noticed Paola was perhaps their latest addition. She may be too fresh and new for anyone to get a bead on, yet.

Jabber09, I'd guess the "Insert Image" button's being greyed out was one of those things. If it happens again, you can always download an image to your computer and use the "Attachments" button, as I explained in this post.

Remember Jander711 and I had a recent exchange, where Jander711 explained one reason for using his teeny-weeny attachments was because they match up with the shots from the site, and I replied those millions of mini-shots were confusing? I can see now the site has had an overhaul, and no longer features the millions of mini-shots. It's very free-visitor unfriendly - one only gets to see one page each for "Recent Girls" and "Popular Girls," the only two links of value, aside from "Login." Useless!

(Well, not so useless; had I the presence of mind to pay a visit, I could have answered my own "Nervous" question, I can now see.)

While wondering if I could dig up Marsha's scene (I mainly got tons of "Chilling Effects" notices), I ran into the "mrstiff" site (link has been disallowed; try Googling "mrstiff netvideogirls.com galleries" without the quotes) which featured galleries of photos of three dozen or so NVG girls, including Marsha. They claimed the photos were from the site, so presumably there are hidden links on the site for paying members.

You might recall when Jander711 gave his great recommendation for the "Charlotte & Adriana" video (and even filled us in with news of another production of theirs... these girls are a team!) ... they have received some talk on this site, and the anonymous puppy offering thoughts claimed the real names of the pair, Scarlet Red and Dawn Dynamite, are Ariel and Kholi. For whatever that's worth. (The page also features a link to Xvideos, featuring a clip from the girls' second production.)

While on this page, I was reminded of the old "Audra" episode:

796b93d441deacd7edbb3505427b8a10.5.jpg


(Son of a gun, I used one a'them Jander711-style itsy-bitsy shots myself. Shame on me!)

In my previous post, I posed the question, why do you suppose in the "Confused" Bridgette episode, there would be such abrupt editing? Right after she is sitting with her top removed, suddenly we see Bridgette giving a blow-job, with no build-up - and then just as suddenly we see her having intercourse. Unless Mr. NVG is so devilishly clever, knowing how to create doubt with idiots like me, and purposely throws us for a loop, normally you'd think if all of this were staged, the events would proceed in a linear fashion, as events usually proceed in most NVG episodes.

Seeing Audra reminded me that the same thing happened with her episode; she was hesitant and uncomfortable, and then all of a sudden, she was seen having sex. As though all of this could be real, and the transition element needed to be edited out, or could not be filmed.

I know people hate discussions on this thread, but won't you please venture a guess? It goes to the crux of NVG's theme, the idea of robbing unsuspecting ladies of their womanly fortunes, before they know what hits them. There wouldn't be all these professional porn performers involved if the series wasn't fake, but then you get something like this that does not make sense.

.
 

Petra

Cult Mother and Simpering Cunt
Warning: Please don't take images from the NetVideoGirls site. You DO NOT have their permission to do so.


Putting an image that you find somewhere on the internet for the purpose of identification is one thing, but pulling their images from their site is completely another as it is THEIR property.

Hopefully we can keep this thread up and running so everyone can enjoy it, but action will have to be taken if the blatant copyright violations continue.

Thank you for your compliance with this matter!
 
.
Obviously, the NVG site has clamped down extremely hard on their property, as they have every right to do. They have taken over the tube sites with sponsored videos, and the rogue videos are no longer as easy to find. I just ran into the “original Xyla” one that Throwaway24 has referred to (you know a site has a lot of girls if there is more than one named “Xyla”), and it turned out to be a sponsored video disguised as a rogue – a full-lengther, but the latter part was blacked out.

We may also conclude NVG is aware of this thread, as they appear to have complained, forcing Petra to post his warning message. (Gee, Petra, must you legitimize that corrupt site Wikipedia, for the avatar explanation?) So hands off the photos from the NVG site, not that I’ve seen anything other than a few measly ones in their two accessible pages for the free visitor (as I remarked very recently).

So anything else that’s NVG off the Internet is okay, but technically, that’s not true either… it’s all their property. (And what if a member takes a photo off the Internet, without knowing it originally appeared on the NVG site?) My advice to the NVG man: in one of your favorite words, be cool. This thread shows up on a lot of searches for NVG and is stimulating a lot of interest for your site, which is good for your business. (And legally, there is something called “Fair Use.” Not that legalities matter when a scary letter from a lawyer arrives.)


In my last post, I exhibited my stupidity by wondering whether the NVG material is, at least sometimes, real. You’ve got to admit, sometimes you run into a scene and can’t believe it’s been acted. I just watched “Camile” where she puts a halt to the proceedings, and it’s just the kind of thing that creates doubt.

netvideogirls Camile.jpg

What made me start wondering was the site owner who seemed genuinely convinced everything was on the level, in the article I recently referred to… I do believe Pierre Woodman, in his older output, did his taping on the sly, and only afterwards did he get the ladies’ signed releases (no doubt accompanied with a bundle of cash). Could that have been the same technique utilized in at least some of the NVG cases? (Aside from the secret filming aspect, of course.)

On the other hand, I have gained new insight for the “Why the abrupt editing” technique that also made me wonder. In the case of the “Audra” example, I can see there is a new 49-minute version that includes everything. So the common version that goes for twenty minutes (there is another one running for 26-27 minutes labeled as “remastered” as well, the thumbs for which indicate fellatio-only) simply utilized partial elements of their shoot. In short, the abrupt editing was an illusion… it does not seem like they took any time out from the filming, as they may have needed to do with a woman who was not in on the gag.

In case anyone finds this issue fascinating – and how could you not? – there was a NVG thread in Forum.ophilia (and a second thread that I see our own Jander711 took part in; on the first couple of pages he even shared images of his impressive collection, making the rest of us envious) that explored the question. Let me give some of the more relevant mouthings below:


PAGES 4 & 5:


Chili (Sep 14, 2007):
(Featured are) actual girls he picked up (nice looking too)and not net hoes....some of his more recent girls, like Lorena for instance, I have seen on other "amateur" sites... I wonder if she was someone he really picked up or if she is just paid to be on these sites.

Sugarman (Sep 16, 2007):
..Once he started paying it all fell apart. but I could never understand how an obvious coke-head could get like 200 chicks just by touching their face and not one complained that they were being filmed being fucked by a complete stanger, that once he came they would pick up and leave and not follow him around for next 3 weeks, that none of them sued him for putting the video on the internet without their consent, and, that the little video launched the careers of Gia Paloma, Riley Brookes, Claire Bandit, Eve Lawrence, Alaura Eden, Isabella Soprano, Kimber aka Teryn - http://www.epornreview.com/g4966 - etc etc etc.


Vidman01 (Sep. 18, 2007):
He only puts the ones online that don't object. That seems obvious... My guess is they have to sign something when the scene is over and the camera is off. Seems obvious too.

Gibsonsst (Sep 18, 2007):
Thats not 100% true, he does post rejection videos as well.



PAGES 25-26:


Jamesr:
How many of these vids truly use amateur girls and how many are girls hired to act like a first timer? After watching just a few of these, it is hard to get a good idea of how this website works, so I am hoping someone who has seen a lot of them can shed some light on the authenticity of these vids. Thanks.

Porcus:
All of them are pro or semi-pro.

Pickiboon:
And Some become famous as Sarah Blake or Tory Lane and Haley page and I forgot a lot

Porcus:
I agree but they didn't become famous thanks to him. If im not wrong Tory Lane-Alexa Rae and some others were already in business before he shot those videos.

Scanman01:
I don't believe that. Maybe they turned pro after this audition, but I'm 100% sure a lot of them are real. You can't act the surprise and even a little fear like that. If they all are pro's and the audition is fake, then some of them should be considered to be the new Meryl Streep.

Porcus:
How many girls you have met that could fuck in front of a camera with a completely strange guy at first sight? After all this guy is unknown (or better known only as "California Pimp") and not Pierre Woodman who has a production behind and could make them famous anytime.


Pickiboon:
You're right porcus , i've worked several years for big french production as a Casting Director and all the girls i've cast ( thousands) knew what they come for and what we will ask them to do. And we always talk about the price for all (presentations) and scene. What is smart in the case of NVG is that the guy is basing his action and credibility on an announce in a free paper and as request for modelling and Bikini Calendar. He tells he is just the assistant of the casting Director good idea . All girls that want to become a model know that she has to be prepared to show her integral body and most of them which have not the real look or caracteristics to be a model are ready to do more to become a part of this business I met alot of girls That I refuse and that where asking me to fuck with me or to become my assistant or mistress. I've never accepted because in this business if you accept one time you loose your credibility .
That's why I think that for this website girls are semi-pro or amator and prepared and paid and more are playing a role ( could it be good for their future career) .
But to answer your basic question not all the girls are ready to be filmed but a lot dream of that and you just have to be friendly and reassuring to become credible and if they are hot you win the big pack !!!




lilwizzy
(Jul 06, 2010):
I've been wanting to ask the experts this, is there any truth in the netvideogirls videos?

Pickiboon:
Not really. Most of the girls are amat and some just come to make their first times on cam , this site is known as a good discover of talent for the future. I've seen some Pro-Am and they sometimes comme to make a vid with Jim but a big part is just one time . so apreciate this material ..




Of additional interest, as reported on the above forum, is that at one time our boy expanded his operation. Any takers (assuming the plan went into effect) must have gotten a good idea of the ins-and-outs:


News - Thur July 1, 2010 9:08am. Good morning gentlemen, Shannon was just added. Check this out. Within a couple of weeks customers like you can now start submitted your own videos. I'll show you how to do it, all the way from placing the ads to getting the girls. I'll even pay you 1,000.00 for each video you submit providing your follow some basic rules. It's all being sorted out now and you can see more information here in the coming days. Once again for all this to go down there has to be a set of strict rules to follow. This is something I have always wanted to do but couldnt quite figure out until one of my customers laid out all down. Mr Roma- you are the man!! Study up on anchoring fellas, I keep telling you all this stuff works. Now we can finally see how the lessons learned here are being translated and carried out by normal guys all over the world.


.
 
I don't think this one is mentioned yet. Her adult film star name is Rachel Hobbes and I think she used the same name, possibly spelled Rachael in NVG. My image button is still greyed out but not the video link so here she is at xhampster.
[video]http://xhamster.com/movies/210627/rachel_hobbes_after_cheerleader_practice.html[/video]
 
.

MEGAN MANIA..!


Yep, yet another reminder why it's so important to put up pictures, so the rest of us can know who is who... or whom. (We may not know the rules for who-whom, but at least we should know which NVG lady is which. Or what... or why..?) Just make sure not to take the pics off the NVG site, for Anthony's sake.

So I was curious about a Megan, and I wanted to see what the back pages revealed. The only "Megan" I could see who was touched upon, first revealed by Member Tipiti over seven years ago, was...



Meghan Edison (Meghan)

(As she appeared in "Peter North & Meghan Edison - Deep Throat This 15" - 2003. Please click to enlarge.)


Here are the NVG Megans I am aware of:


The heavily made-up Megan:

netvideogirls Megan make-up.jpg


The pierced Megan:

1408140300000116.jpg



Wait a minute, that's Piers Morgan. Man, I get so confused. Here she is:


netvideogirls Megan recent.jpg

I just learned through looking around that the above Megan also made a return appearance.



Then there's the eye-popping and uncertain Megan, who appeared with the "attacking" Tera.

netvideogirls Megan with Tera.jpg

At first I thought this might have been the "Meghan" Megan, because... well... they are both blond? (I enjoy jumping to simplistic conclusions.) But the faces certainly looked different, and to make sure there is no room for doubt, I noticed Meghan Edison does not have a tattoo over her breast:


(From "I've Never Done That Before 16" Please click to enlarge.)


Are you telling me there was another Megan, probably from 2003, when Meghan was most active? (If you know, do shed some light.)

Try researching that and see what you come up with - it's tough! (Why is there no reference to this episode... anywhere?) All the more reason why we have to be thankful for the members among us who have proved to be so brilliant, in coming up with the answers.


.
 
Thank you for letting us know. Is it possible to send a warning to the offenders directly as well and remove the offending reply? I would hate for all of us to lose this thread because of some people that are too lazy to read/follow the rules.

Warning: Please don't take images from the NetVideoGirls site. You DO NOT have their permission to do so.


Putting an image that you find somewhere on the internet for the purpose of identification is one thing, but pulling their images from their site is completely another as it is THEIR property.

Hopefully we can keep this thread up and running so everyone can enjoy it, but action will have to be taken if the blatant copyright violations continue.

Thank you for your compliance with this matter!
 
This thread is remarkable.

@ Know-way i was drinking watermelon juice when i glanced your Piers Morgan reference above and it was too hiliarious. I kept my composure, applied a little NLP to myself and swallowed without spilling a drop. Very hard to do. :)

Kaci Starr first scene with NVG. Megan ( with Tera ) only did that one video. It's not the same Megan, that appeared in the later years. Now, Tera, she was something else. Very cool girl, though she ended up working only with girls again, post NVG, she was going out with a guy and I'll never forget him. Truly special one a kind, good guy. I miss him.
 
Top