• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Pattycake / Patty Cake

Mr. Daystar

In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
Just to clear up any confusion, these are uncensored in my members section. :surprise:
Plugged for your pleasure. :o




So what you are in fact saying is, in the PAY section of your site, those pictures provide the very long awaited, and anticipated view of your....hhmmm...orifices? If one were to pay the full membership fee, they would see, unobstructed in ANY WAY, your spread butt cheeks, and completely exposed balloon knot, and a full view of your pussy?
 

Mr. Daystar

In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
:error: In case anyone missed it:



If anyone is still confused, check the promo gallery. ;)

That's very lovey. It however shows you, in the same outfit, and you are covering yourself.

A simple yes or no would probably be the easiest way to clear this up. Many people, including myself, would like to see you fully nude, and enjoying your own body, in a very personal way. I think I can safely say, I speak for a small handful of people that would pay the price of admission, if they knew for sure. No one is asking you to post a freebie, only a simple answer. A reasonable request from a lot of people that have waited patiently.
 
That's very lovey. It however shows you, in the same outfit, and you are covering yourself.

A simple yes or no would probably be the easiest way to clear this up. Many people, including myself, would like to see you fully nude, and enjoying your own body, in a very personal way. I think I can safely say, I speak for a small handful of people that would pay the price of admission, if they knew for sure. No one is asking you to post a freebie, only a simple answer. A reasonable request from a lot of people that have waited patiently.

That's because the answer is no. There's probably a small, quick far away view of her pussy as always but no chance of actually being able to see anything
 

Hahahaha, reading that in Bill Oreilly's voice was hilarious. I agree. That butt plug looked great in your huge lovely butt, Patty.

Btw, for all the whiners and I would like to quote Hotbagel23 with his amazing post number of just 1: ''There's probably a small, quick far away view of her pussy as always but no chance of actually being able to see anything'' buddy, listen up and listen good.

I'm a member of Patty's website, I have access to, all her content.

We can see Patty's pussy, over a hundread time in the photo sets or videos that she put out through the years. Hundreads of times. Lots, up close and in great quality. There are, tons of topless content too, Patty Ranger video being one. Ugly Patty being another, most of her LTO, the list goes on. There are much tease but there are also much nude.

I bought the recent zipset ''Patty and the Beast''. We can see Patty's pussy many, many times and those are clear, zoomed-in, in your face, shots. There is even penetration so you people can keep whining but you're whining for nothing, you're fake news because what you say is simply not the truth.

We are not in 2004 anymore, Patty shows A LOT more than she did 13 years ago.

So to all the whiners, instead of losing hair over fake news of Patty not going nude, I suggest that you subscribe to her website and enjoy the nudity. Much smarter and much more productive.

As for whalers90 giving me bad rep for defending Patty, feel free to give me bad rep again. :p
 
We can see Patty's pussy, over a hundread time in the photo sets or videos that she put out through the years. Hundreads of times. Lots, up close and in great quality. There are, tons of topless content too, Patty Ranger video being one. Ugly Patty being another, most of her LTO, the list goes on. There are much tease but there are also much nude.

Thing is that what you might call hundreds of times up close isn't what most of the people think about "up close" being used to more direct open longer private shots other models and/or pornstars do. Yeah, after hundreds of scenes, you might be able to make a mental image of the pussy, ass and tits, but lets be honest, there still isn't open all bare shot available without any hiding. I won't judge the model about that it's her choice, but I wouldn't wonder if the membership numbers plummet. The price of frustration is hard to please without direct approach.
 
Thing is that what you might call hundreds of times up close isn't what most of the people think about "up close" being used to more direct open longer private shots other models and/or pornstars do. Yeah, after hundreds of scenes, you might be able to make a mental image of the pussy, ass and tits, but lets be honest, there still isn't open all bare shot available without any hiding. I won't judge the model about that it's her choice, but I wouldn't wonder if the membership numbers plummet. The price of frustration is hard to please without direct approach.

I understand what you're saying and I agree, Patty does not show her intimate parts as much as many pornstars or models, like you said, that's the choice she made and we have to respect it. I don't want to contradict you but I will contradict you by saying that there are all bare shots available without any hiding, believe me. :D I'm a member and I saw all of Patty's content, I know. There is lots of hiding, which is to be expected from a tease model but Patty also shows the goods, you just have to look because it's not in a majority of content But it's there, 100%.

As for frustration, people can be frustrated. I'm saying that it's a waste of time and that there are far more productive things to do than whine about an Internet model. With millions of girls spreading their pussys on websites such as Pornhub and doing DP, double anal, it's irrational to be frustrated because one girl won't do it.

I'm just exposing my point of view, in a very calm fashion. Everyone is free to do as they please, I'm sharing my wisdom. ;)
 
The site looks very interesting but I'm curious about the zip sets which look to be an extra cost-

Is that better content than the general content?

Any input would be great before I join-

Thanks-

BB
 
Hahahaha, reading that in Bill Oreilly's voice was hilarious. I agree. That butt plug looked great in your huge lovely butt, Patty.

Btw, for all the whiners and I would like to quote Hotbagel23 with his amazing post number of just 1: ''There's probably a small, quick far away view of her pussy as always but no chance of actually being able to see anything'' buddy, listen up and listen good.

I'm a member of Patty's website, I have access to, all her content.

We can see Patty's pussy, over a hundread time in the photo sets or videos that she put out through the years. Hundreads of times. Lots, up close and in great quality. There are, tons of topless content too, Patty Ranger video being one. Ugly Patty being another, most of her LTO, the list goes on. There are much tease but there are also much nude.

I bought the recent zipset ''Patty and the Beast''. We can see Patty's pussy many, many times and those are clear, zoomed-in, in your face, shots. There is even penetration so you people can keep whining but you're whining for nothing, you're fake news because what you say is simply not the truth.

We are not in 2004 anymore, Patty shows A LOT more than she did 13 years ago.

So to all the whiners, instead of losing hair over fake news of Patty not going nude, I suggest that you subscribe to her website and enjoy the nudity. Much smarter and much more productive.

As for whalers90 giving me bad rep for defending Patty, feel free to give me bad rep again. :p

My post count has nothing to do with the what I'm saying. Guess who is also a member of her site? Guessed? Good, I am and for what Whalers90/Thedog195/TheWhitedevil were asking your absolutely lying to them. There isn't a ton of topless content, in your face content. That Patty Ranger video your talking about was a far away shot with her hair covering her tits then after a few pictures she covers them with her arm. Sure, she was topless but you aren't seeing anything for more than a sec or two. The beast video she teased on here it's a far away shot you literally can't see anything. That pixelated bathroom she posted here saying it was uncensored? Yeah it's uncensored but her tits are covered by bubbles so you can't see anything anyway. I can go on and on if more examples are needed. Hell, you can go plenty of sets without seeing anything as well. I went through her last 8 photo sets there are two pictures where you can clearly see her pussy. You mention Patty and the Beast. I'm sure you do see it a ton in that but no offense I'm paying 25 for the site already and I have to pay another 30 to actually see that? I'll pass on that. LTO if they join now you can't see them so what's the point for them?

Don't get me wrong, I like Patty. I love her body and I do enjoy a good amount of the content she has put out but I'm not going to act like there aren't times caps aren't posted to make her videos look like she's exploring new territory on her site and it just ends up being the same ol' same ol'
 
Last edited:
The site looks very interesting but I'm curious about the zip sets which look to be an extra cost-

Is that better content than the general content?

Any input would be great before I join-

Thanks-

BB

They are an extra cost typically $15-$30. The ones I've seen have been better than her general content
 

Tease

Approved Content Owner
Debating how much nudity is on a site that is an "Almost Nude Tease Site" is a stupid endeavor. I wish I had that much time.

Pattycake, Brooke, Bailey, Nikki, Madden, etc are their own genre. Do you watch a scifi movie and yell at the screen that laser guns aren't real or Superman can't really fly? It's bizarre and I see it on all those models' threads.

Those models have no obligation to you to bend to your demands. It is their bodies, their sites. I have even seen straight up porn stars get bitched at for not caving to some creepy vocal minority (meaning one troll) on the internet for not doing anal or taking a cream pie or not showing their feet enough. That last one even seems kind of ironic.

No matter how rude you get, no matter how much you try to claim "everyone" feels like you and they should just do what you demand, it doesn't matter and they don't. The sites aren't for you, and they don't want you to join. And harassing OSCM is against the Freeones rules.

whalers90 and TheWhiteDevil have both been banned by mods in the past for continually harassing Pattycake about this. They just can't help themselves.

This other guy now with three posts (all complaints) says some interesting things. Basically, the site shows stuff but only sometimes. Please go back to the first sentence.

"Almost Nude Tease Site"
 

Mr. Daystar

In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
Debating how much nudity is on a site that is an "Almost Nude Tease Site" is a stupid endeavor. I wish I had that much time.

Pattycake, Brooke, Bailey, Nikki, Madden, etc are their own genre. Do you watch a scifi movie and yell at the screen that laser guns aren't real or Superman can't really fly? It's bizarre and I see it on all those models' threads.

Those models have no obligation to you to bend to your demands. It is their bodies, their sites. I have even seen straight up porn stars get bitched at for not caving to some creepy vocal minority (meaning one troll) on the internet for not doing anal or taking a cream pie or not showing their feet enough. That last one even seems kind of ironic.

No matter how rude you get, no matter how much you try to claim "everyone" feels like you and they should just do what you demand, it doesn't matter and they don't. The sites aren't for you, and they don't want you to join. And harassing OSCM is against the Freeones rules.

whalers90 and TheWhiteDevil have both been banned by mods in the past for continually harassing Pattycake about this. They just can't help themselves.

This other guy now with three posts (all complaints) says some interesting things. Basically, the site shows stuff but only sometimes. Please go back to the first sentence.

"Almost Nude Tease Site"

No, I have not been banned for harassing anyone, and to claim that asking a simple question, to which one only expects a straight answer is FAR from harassment. Case in point above. All I asked is if she actually shows all of the goods this time, which she clearly insinuated she did....however there was no straight answer, there was her typical half assed dancing around the subject, and posted, "plugged for your pleasure". That means you can't see shit, except for the toys blocking the view, or her fingers strategically place. All she had to do was say no. I could give a fuck less if this chick shows off her twat, EVER....but when she does, I'll probably pay to see it, but I'm not going to be ripped off...STOLEN FROM, by anyone, because they want to play games. I'm a 51 year old man, I passed the playing games stage at about 15 fucking years old. It was a simple question, yes, and I would pay to see it. No, and I would not.

I never said she had an obligation to show anything, EVER...it would be nice, she's cute, but I could care fucking less. She does however have an obligation to be truthful to potential customers, providing she has some pride in her work, and a reasonable business ethic...and I don';t need a fucking lecture from your silly square ass about the rules....why don't you go to the "how do you view girls that won't do interracial" thread, and have a fun time arguing with those fuckwits.

FOR PATTY: Lets be clear, I asked a fair, and simple question, and all I asked for is an honest, non-cryptic answer. Whether you post it here, or in a p.m., that's all I asked for. You wanna show the goods, have at it. If not, like YOU YOURSELF posted...there are plenty of hot chicks on this site that will give me what I want. If this guy is speaking for you....do yourself a favor, and find someone else. If he's not speaking for you, then you should tell him to mind his own fucking business.
 
Top