Super_Noob
Banned
Re: Next Door Nikki /Nikki Sims/Nikki's Playmates
don't make the bullshit argument that "she would not have done as well had she gone all the way because she would've been like every other girl". perhaps in the beginning the "non nude" aspect helped increase her popularity and value. but in the end, the whole "non nude" nonsense did not make her any more appealing than she already was. the reality is that nikki was a lot hotter than most pornstars/models in her prime. this is the ONLY reason she succeeded in grabbing our attention. she featured a young, innocent face, in combination with a large rack but slim body, and the kind of amateur girl you wish you could fuck personality and appearance.
nikki had an opportunity to strike it big when she was younger, but then she grew old, had a kid, and missed out. i will admit, she's still fairly good looking now, but nothing compared to her prime. but oh wells. it happens. whether or not a pornstar has done non nude is the past makes little difference, in the end it's all about how hot and how desirable the girl is which will determine her outcome in this business.
why is it that pornstars like lela star have done so well in the business? or sammie rhodes? or ashlyn brooke? or that neela or neesa chick (i'm not good with porn)? it's because they're hot. guys love em. they never get bored of watching their favorite chicks get pounded. i remember when i was younger, i beated the fuck off to lucy thai non stop. it's hardly changed since then. and i've got at least 12 different vids of her too.
the last thing we need are more tools on this board.
and here's my first and only actual contribution to this thread and i took it from the old nikki thread.
it's old. but it features some slips which may interest you all.
http://www.dumpstersluts.com/blog/2005/01/next-door-nikki-topless.html
don't make the bullshit argument that "she would not have done as well had she gone all the way because she would've been like every other girl". perhaps in the beginning the "non nude" aspect helped increase her popularity and value. but in the end, the whole "non nude" nonsense did not make her any more appealing than she already was. the reality is that nikki was a lot hotter than most pornstars/models in her prime. this is the ONLY reason she succeeded in grabbing our attention. she featured a young, innocent face, in combination with a large rack but slim body, and the kind of amateur girl you wish you could fuck personality and appearance.
nikki had an opportunity to strike it big when she was younger, but then she grew old, had a kid, and missed out. i will admit, she's still fairly good looking now, but nothing compared to her prime. but oh wells. it happens. whether or not a pornstar has done non nude is the past makes little difference, in the end it's all about how hot and how desirable the girl is which will determine her outcome in this business.
why is it that pornstars like lela star have done so well in the business? or sammie rhodes? or ashlyn brooke? or that neela or neesa chick (i'm not good with porn)? it's because they're hot. guys love em. they never get bored of watching their favorite chicks get pounded. i remember when i was younger, i beated the fuck off to lucy thai non stop. it's hardly changed since then. and i've got at least 12 different vids of her too.
the last thing we need are more tools on this board.
and here's my first and only actual contribution to this thread and i took it from the old nikki thread.
it's old. but it features some slips which may interest you all.
http://www.dumpstersluts.com/blog/2005/01/next-door-nikki-topless.html
