your lucky im to sick to be in a bad mood ..
all kidding aside the lions have a good solid defense its there ofense that needs an upgrade and find a QB who doesnt have a glass shoulder
What will be scary about the Lions defense is if they ever get good people in the secondary. Their defensive backs have to be among the worst in the game as a group. Their defensive line is getting very stout. If their front four is ever given a second or two more to get to the quarterback than now it will be something opponents will begin to seriously dread. It was nice to see the Lions not blow the game at the end though.
How about them Bears? The Patriots are one of the best teams in the league, but the Bears got absolutely crushed and embarrassed to the point that's well beyond acceptable even considering that or even taken into account they aren't as good as their record makes them seem.
As far as MVP awards (in any sport) or things like the Heisman it should go to the BEST PLAYER, period. Anything else is just usually crap rationalization voters use for themselves to try and justify not giving it to the best player, when it should go to the BEST PLAYER. Not only are they the most prestigious awards, and the most prestigious awards should go to the best player, but even worse they portray themselves as representing the best player that year, which is incredibly false much of the time.
It would be a little less bad than it is now if people didn't look back on history and judge the quality of people by winning that award. When things like if somebody won a MVP award are used more than actual empirical evidence to tell if a player was better than others or was the best then I have an even bigger problem with it. If people treated them as almost meaningless awards taken with a huge grain of salt it might be something else. I guess if they created a new award and made the voters base it on only who they thought the best player was using nothing else other than their skill on offense and defense and made that the most prestigious award while relegating the MVP award to something along the line of a Best Sportsman of the Year Award in prestige or something like that it might be something I could deal with it better, and be more accurate as far as history is concerned.
I also don't understand why anybody would think football was less violent in the past. Whoever believes that must be unknowledgeable or blinded by nostalgia because it was beyond brutal by today standards. There was no way it was less violent and or more safe in the past. Football is being ruined by all the stupid rules they are putting into it. At some point you can't take the risk out of life, and if they try to soften up football anymore than they have it won't be football anymore. It will be some other sport with the football name on it.