If you're too stupid and lazy to go and and figure things out for yourself then that's your problem...I already took the time too research the issue and develop fully referenced factually accurate statements...What have you done besides run your mouth and ass kiss porn models that don't even like you..absolutely nothing
Where's your references, where's your thesis ...you don't have any... You don't have the intelligence to refute or even question anything I've said...you have no references no statistical evidence, no nothing....relying on unsupported unsubstantiated word of mouth hearsay is irrelevant and pointless...
There is no setting in the UNIVERSE where unsubstantiated claims are in any way shape or form comparable to documented authoritative references...so if all you have is hearsay from a couple of porn models to support your position, whatever that is, then you have no position,,,in fact you have NOTHING ...you're completely SOL
Where's your references, where's your thesis ...you don't have any... You don't have the intelligence to refute or even question anything I've said...you have no references no statistical evidence, no nothing....relying on unsupported unsubstantiated word of mouth hearsay is irrelevant and pointless...
There is no setting in the UNIVERSE where unsubstantiated claims are in any way shape or form comparable to documented authoritative references...so if all you have is hearsay from a couple of porn models to support your position, whatever that is, then you have no position,,,in fact you have NOTHING ...you're completely SOL
i didn't ask you to tell me to reread your posts. i asked you to restate your thesis as a simple and concise statement so as to refocus your argument which has become muddled and cumbersome. there's nothing wrong with my reading comprehension and it's immature and offensive of you to assume such, although you yourself make it pretty clear that arguing with you is pointless, not because you're irrefutable but because you're as incorrigible as a wall and refuse to respect the information provided by your opposition which is provided via word of mouth by individuals who are actually significant in the porn world. i suppose if we were to take the quotes of Mariah, Aaliyah, Sabrina, Jane, Maggie and any other OCSM's that may have posted here and publish them elsewhere and then cite them as references to support our arguments then you may accept them as valid? just because a notable figure stated something in an interview or article that got published does not necessarily mean that it is reliable, serious or accurate information or is pertinent to a given argument. this thread has dwindled to a childish battle of "our experts are better than your experts" just as many internet arguments tend to do, the only difference in this case is that the "experts" supporting one side happen to be directly involved in the exchange. if you were to have belladonna, rocco sifredi and some of your other names actually come on here and take stance against the OCSM's who've posted here then that would be something. until then, if you could, please refocus the intent of your argument.