-
Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
-
FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!
Monique Fuentes
- Thread starter Mega_Montanna
- Start date
Last edited by a moderator:
Vanilla Bear
Bears For Life
Wow hot. She is back?! :nanner:
Love this girl :lovecoupl
Love this girl :lovecoupl
Yep - new scene on Brazzers due out this coming Wednesday. See above messages in this thread.
CJ
Last edited by a moderator:
Vanilla Bear
Bears For Life
PICS! :nanner:
Oh my...She looks AMAZING!
http://porn-star.com/brianna_monique/beach_fuentes.html
:lovecoupl
Oh my...She looks AMAZING!
http://porn-star.com/brianna_monique/beach_fuentes.html
:lovecoupl
Well Monique fans and admirers, the geniuses at Wikipedia who fancy themselves vigilante editors of a sort, have deleted Monique's Wikipedia page. Aside from some of the complete blather comments given on the deletion discussion page (such as that the page was filled with "derogatory comments" (huh?), the main reason appears to be that she did not meet Wikipedia's porn "notability criteria"... being unfamiliar with these, I looked them up:
* Has won or been a serious nominee for a well-known award, such as those listed in Category:Adult movie awards or Category:Film awards or from a major pornographic magazine, such as Penthouse, Playboy, or Playgirl, as well as their counterparts in other pornography genres.
* Has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre, such as beginning a trend in pornography, or starring in an iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature.
* Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media.
Apparently, having an award from Penthouse makes you notable. I also enjoyed the analysis that the fact that the Wiki page shows up first on a Google search means she is not widely written about on the net. My understanding of search position is the number of pages that link to a page that determines its popularity, not how many pages on a subject there are. So that would mean her Wiki page was very popular but apparently not "notable".
So until she gets at least "serious" nomination for an award of some kind, looks like the page will stay down. If you are as displeased as I am (this is the second time the Barney Fief's that patrol these pages have pulled her page down) you may want to get in touch with some of them via email, their names are linked in the discussion page, and register your displeasure. You may especially want to query the doofus who made the "derogatory comments" statement to understand his definition of derogatory. Better yet, if you know of any award she has been nominated for or can think of some other "notability" criterion, pass it along or post it here so we can get her page back up.
Thanks,
CJ
* Has won or been a serious nominee for a well-known award, such as those listed in Category:Adult movie awards or Category:Film awards or from a major pornographic magazine, such as Penthouse, Playboy, or Playgirl, as well as their counterparts in other pornography genres.
* Has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre, such as beginning a trend in pornography, or starring in an iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature.
* Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media.
Apparently, having an award from Penthouse makes you notable. I also enjoyed the analysis that the fact that the Wiki page shows up first on a Google search means she is not widely written about on the net. My understanding of search position is the number of pages that link to a page that determines its popularity, not how many pages on a subject there are. So that would mean her Wiki page was very popular but apparently not "notable".
So until she gets at least "serious" nomination for an award of some kind, looks like the page will stay down. If you are as displeased as I am (this is the second time the Barney Fief's that patrol these pages have pulled her page down) you may want to get in touch with some of them via email, their names are linked in the discussion page, and register your displeasure. You may especially want to query the doofus who made the "derogatory comments" statement to understand his definition of derogatory. Better yet, if you know of any award she has been nominated for or can think of some other "notability" criterion, pass it along or post it here so we can get her page back up.
Thanks,
CJ
Just found this babe and wow, I just can`t get enough!
Those boobs are amazing, without any doubt they are among the sexiest tits I have ever seen :bowdown:
Perfectly round, very firm and totally fake, just as I like them :nanner:
And even though the shape of the tits is really what makes her such a special in my eyes, she is extremely hot and beautiful woman otherwise too!
Thanks for posting all the links, I`m seriously addicted to her boobs at the moment
Those boobs are amazing, without any doubt they are among the sexiest tits I have ever seen :bowdown:
Perfectly round, very firm and totally fake, just as I like them :nanner:
And even though the shape of the tits is really what makes her such a special in my eyes, she is extremely hot and beautiful woman otherwise too!
Thanks for posting all the links, I`m seriously addicted to her boobs at the moment
Yeah, that's true for pornstars but not for mainstream stars. Let's hope she gets nominated for something by AVN or some other porn awards place and then her page can go back up. There are many ersatz pornstars who have nominations and are much less popular than her.
CJ
Last edited by a moderator:
Here you go Berg, your wish is granted. Monique's next new scene looks to be on the MILF Hunter site where, for some reason, her name is spelled with two N's and her ever changing age is given at 34.
MILF Hunter is part of the Reality Kings network of sites that is associated with Brazzers so it is not surprising her second scene is with them.
Here is the link to the site with the ad for her scene but when I tried it today, it was not yet working....
Monique's MILF Hunter Scene
CJ
Last edited by a moderator:
bergstrom
Closed Account
YES!!! One on one. My only complaint would be the costunme, maybe a transparent stocking or something to tease the crap out of us. But I'm happy 2 c her again!!
Thanks CJ,
berg
Last edited by a moderator:
You don't like the garters? I think they are pretty hot on her and she has rarely done a scene in garters before - maybe one. I like the red jacket on her too.... pretty hot when she scoots onto that bar stool and lowers it so he can gain access....
Heard she canceled two scheduled shoots for Naughty America at the last minute. Hope that does not mean she is suddenly back out.
CJ
