Even if she did sign on to do those things, as soon as it's not fun for her anymore they should stop. That's how it should be.
I was going to qoute a much earlier post because I wanted to talk about this very issue, so thansk for bringing it up M-man.
I don't really know what exactly the law is on this, because it seems that everyone is getting screwed (no pun intended.) I think that this is getting into forbidden territory, so i'll can the specifics and just appeal to general reasoning... the question is where do you draw the line? what i'm saying is that once you sign a contract saying that you will do something, what are the concessions that are to be made? if the conditions that you find yourself in upon performing that task are at health risk, morally/ethically, or otherwise objectionable for the participant what grounds do they have to refuse to comply with it?
going back to the subject, once you sign a contract saying that you will have sex with someone and you don't, then they can sue you? that seems to be the law, but it sounds a little ridiculous to me.
I think we all know that maxy is a shitbag.
obscenity to be determined by moral minority standards? iffy, but most seem to say no to that.
So the real question to me is about how the industry needs to have an inquiry into these legal liablity contracts, it seems obvious that they just aren't working right and need some kind of reform.