Katerina Hartlova / Kathy Kozy / Katrin / Snow / Katarina Dubrova / Kathy Heinz / Katrina Hart

Re: Katerina Hartlova / Kathy Kozy / Katrin / Snow / Katarina Dubrova

No you're not the only one. As a matter of fact, the negative comments above have been a surprise to me. As she or her manager/director/webmaster/whatever is very well aware of, her bukkake scene IS legendary. It's from a girl with top notch looks but incredibly boring b/g performances and her beauty was the ultimate jackpot for Torbe in a series that often feature not-so-attractive girls.

There is nothing wrong with bukkake per se, but the problem I had was the quality of it. Yes she has amazing looks, has some serious potential as a model but she is treated in that clip like a girl picked off the street and treated like crap by the gathered group of "male talent". Video quality was poor, looked like it was shot in someones basement, how the hell they convinced her I'll never know.

If she wants to do that sort of thing, cool, I might even enjoy it myself, but up the standards a little bit. Treat dumpster trash like dumpster trash, shes a sexy woman, takes good care of herself and is a model who produces high quality work. If you want her hosed in cum, make some effort to make it look like a pro job.
 
Re: Katerina Hartlova / Kathy Kozy / Katrin / Snow / Katarina Dubrova

"I simply wanted to tease my members, remind them my legendary bukkake scene"

Legendary? Its horrible, I saw it once a while ago and it is the most degrading piece of work I have ever seen her do.


Pornography is a sort of degrading and humiliating art. And that's "by definition" (ever noticed performers never use their real name?). But even if degrading and humilating that doesn't prevent us to appreciate it.
So, what's the matter? you didn't like it? oh well, so we are debating about someone tastes... i guess it's gonna be a neverending topic.
 
Re: Katerina Hartlova / Kathy Kozy / Katrin / Snow / Katarina Dubrova

Pornography is a sort of degrading and humiliating art. And that's "by definition" (ever noticed performers never use their real name?).

Exactly. Even the so-called female or couple-friendly porn often caters to masochistic fantasies of women. The problem is cheap porn producers like Torbe don't have the means to degrade and humiliate in a lavish fashion.

Furthermore, porn actresses fuck for cash also off camera as a rule of thumb, which is not the best kept secret in the industry. So, the next time you see a slut get humiliated in a video, just think that it may actually be not the worst she's ever had.
 
Last edited:
Re: Katerina Hartlova / Kathy Kozy / Katrin / Snow / Katarina Dubrova

Exactly. Even the so-called female or couple-friendly porn often caters to masochistic fantasies of women. The problem is cheap porn producers like Torbe don't have the means to degrade and humiliate in a lavish fashion.
Really? So the whole concept of erotica is just something that "exploits" some sort of false idea of "mutual consent"?

This is what I don't understand. Some of you guys enjoy pornography, but then constantly complain about it. You want it, but want to blast it, and everyone else for it, even if they don't "enjoy" it like you do. Many of you use degrading terms, because you enjoy doing so. That's not what all of us do, let alone many see that not being about pornography, but just degrading people in general. You call it destructive, and only add to it. All the meanwhile, you miss the obviousness of the truth.

As a consumer you could easily demand pornography where sex is consensual, and something the female starlet is comfortable with. If more consumers were demanding such, then it would be more mainstream. It would be erotica and more art than degrading or, worse yet, violent. The latter is just using pornography as an excuse. The former is just illustrating and capturing normal, human animal instinct on-film, while ensuring the full participation and consent of all actors or actresses involved.

One is outcast, catering to non-sexual matters in a sexual format. The other is natural, and there's nothing wrong with it. Pornography can and should be about consent and pleasure, not using sex as an excuse for something that has little to do with sex.

Furthermore, porn actresses fuck for cash also off camera as a rule of thumb, which is not the best kept secret in the industry. So, the next time you see a slut get humiliated in a video, just think that it may actually be not the worst she's ever had.
Association after association after association. There is no "rule of thumb" on drugs, escorting and other things.

If anything, intercourse in a controlled environment, whether it is a monogamous or limited polygamous relationship or a regularly STD tested industry, is "safer" than random, promiscuous sex. Is it foolproof? Hardly. But STD infection rates are lower in controlled environments than not.

I am sure Katerina has had some poor experiences she did not enjoy. Various publication houses and others who shoot sometimes cater to newer, unsuspecting starlets. That is a problem, I don't disagree. But it looks like Katerina has more recently settled into a monogamous relationship, shooting with her boyfriend, in a more controlled environment.

Of course, starlets in monogamous relationships tend to get a whole new series of complaints from some of you guys, caring little for the comfort and peace of the starlet herself. So it adds to the self-fulling prophecy that "porn is bad, don't do porn." Yet you still want it, and you want it in ways that are degrading or otherwise having little to do with the nature of mutual consent and the act itself, but underlying issues unrelated to sex.

So the industry serves the paying consumer. This is the result, even if some consumers do not want it. You can't legislate it away. You can only change by saying so with your paying dollar. So far the default attitude of treating pornography as unhealthy results in people considering it outcast, so most of the paying consumers are looking for outcast stuff. If it was far more mainstream, and more people paying to see consensual sex, then pornography would be viewed completely different.

The problem is how people and society as a whole approach pornography, not that pornography itself is "bad." Ironically this is not too much different than politics. We blame our leaders for how we argue and vote, yet the results are entirely based on partisan politics instead of focusing on the issues, something too many of us condone, even if indirectly. The issues with pornography have little to do with filming a natural act such as sex, but how the common consumer, like the common voter, approaches it, as herded sheep, even if indirectly.

Right now I feel some of the hottest pornography is by Conny Lior. There is no creature more beautiful than a woman at total peace while experiencing increasing pleasure, with her lover. She's not even my favorite type of looker or body, and yet, she glows like she is the best starlet ever. Hmmm, might have something to do with her comfort level perhaps?
 
Re: Katerina Hartlova / Kathy Kozy / Katrin / Snow / Katarina Dubrova

Her b/g scenes are still boring , she can do better with other guys.

She does it for money and we can seen it :( even she's such a beauty...
 
Re: Katerina Hartlova / Kathy Kozy / Katrin / Snow / Katarina Dubrova

Case-in-point ...
Her b/g scenes are still boring , she can do better with other guys.
So move on to another woman who does what you want. Is it so hard as a consumer? Or is it ...
She does it for money and we can seen it :( even she's such a beauty...
Ahhh, you fixate on a beauty, and as a consumer, you think she should do what you want, right? That's the problem. Instead of moving on to "another starlet" who does what you want, you want "this starlet" to do what you want.

So the question then goes back to you, as a consumer, deciding what she -- one specific starlet -- does, instead of deciding on another starlet who does what you want? Kinda mirrors some attitudes with dating, and the issues of lack of consent. Just because someone took her out that cost him money doesn't mean he gets something ... anything at all.

I think Hollywood, at least here in the US, possibly the western hemisphere, has set us up for this concept of "the one" or otherwise limiting ourselves in our choice of women. In reality, there are a lot of women out there, and fixating on just one or a few, and believing she will do what some of us want when she has not, is hardly healthy.

God knows if I would have limited myself and my choice in life based on factors seeded by the US media, which skewed my lust for years, I would have never met the most beautiful woman of my life. Here I am, many, many years later, and I still have not met anyone like her, and damn am I glad I ignored some of my friends.

Katerina is absolutely stunning. But instead of wishing she would do something, I am content to enjoy her as she wishes to be filmed, in comfort and consent to her level, not others. If there is one constant in pornography, it is the fact that no matter what a starlet does, some will not be satisfied, and some will still be disappointed.
 
Re: Katerina Hartlova / Kathy Kozy / Katrin / Snow / Katarina Dubrova

@ Member2019

Lol bro, you seem to be one clueless guy with no one to listen to you. Writing and writing about things that are barely connected to the issue all other people here are contemplating on. Obviously a nerd who passionately faps at porn and wants to sound smart at the same time. :yoda:
 
Re: Katerina Hartlova / Kathy Kozy / Katrin / Snow / Katarina Dubrova

I could lick Kathy all over, especially her lovely labia :)

More VirtualGirl:-

http://gallery.virtuagirlhd.com/index01_new.php?dir=a1362

Butterfly:-

http://gallery.virtuagirlhd.com/a1362/full/VGI0902P030109.jpg
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://gallery.virtuagirlhd.com/index01.php?dir=a1360&ids=887

Butterfly:-

http://gallery.virtuagirlhd.com/a1360/full/VGI0902P010164.jpg
 
Top