Karlie Montana - Carleen, Carli Montana, Carlie, Hazel, Karlee Montana, Karli Montana, Karlie Montana, Karly Montana, Karlye Montana

I joined her site in the middle of august because of the news she will release boy/girl content mid august early september then karlie comes out and says I only feel comfortable doing it on nakedchatlive. So she get's everyone to join her site cause of the great news then does boy/girl it on another site which is way to expensive. Yes I'm a little pissed but I guess I can't blame her I have to blame the peolple who post copyrighted material on other sites for free.
 
whats amazing is no one has thought to take a screenshot or anything from all of these shows.

Do you think so ? I think a lot of persons made screens from these show, but also respect Karlie and do not share these pix.
I asked the same question. Personally I think you should watch her shows yourselves.
Karlie's performances are natural as her looks are.
Just join the shows, I would say, the price's worthwhile.

Cheers.

100% appreciating your works, Karlie.
I-AM-STERDAM
 
Do you think so ? I think a lot of persons made screens from these show, but also respect Karlie and do not share these pix.
I asked the same question. Personally I think you should watch her shows yourselves.
Karlie's performances are natural as her looks are.
Just join the shows, I would say, the price's worthwhile.

Cheers.

100% appreciating your works, Karlie.
I-AM-STERDAM

No offense, but I wouldn't pay $4 a minute to watch _anyone_.

The cam site she is on screams SCAM to me, I am not giving them any of my money. Not to mention that its horribly organized, there are like 800 chicks on there, and every cam show I've ever seen on other sites was pixelly and stuttered video. I am not paying $40-$60 to watch Karlie for 10-15 minutes, I am sorry. If she only did DVDs, I would buy her DVDs. If she only did camshows hosted on her own site, I would join her site and try to be home in time for the show. This last minute notice stuff on the site she uses now means I'd never get to see her shows even if I wanted to buy credits.

I understand totally she wants her content to be kept from being given away for free on tube sites and whatnot, I get it. It's a catch-22...you want to sell the content, but you don't want it shared or traded so you set things up in a way that that is more difficult to do, but fewer people can pay you to see your new content. I dunno, maybe this has been really successful for her. I can't even navigate that cam site, so I guess I am too stupid to see what she is doing in her shows. =\
 
even if all this "talk" about the new stuff (b/g) is true. its shitty to wait this long for an update. i too was suckered in to the price of nakedchat subscription. only to have the show never load properly on the day of the show. just forget about the 3rd party site and just release the new content by way of your site.
 
Someone's choice may mean somebody else's disappointment.
Life is all about choices. And good luck is also a choice.

I choose to be annoyed by your posts.

We get it...you're happy with the route Karlie took to market her b/g. The rest of us are not so satisfied so...please end the psuedo-philosophical contradictions.

People are angry and I can understand why. Karlie said she was going to host b/g material on her own site and never did and they feel cheated. However, unless you paid to join her site before the content was hosted, then you really didn't lose anything.

One thing I'd like to point out is that Karlie has stated that she didn't want to put stuff on her site because the webmasters weren't maintaining the site properly and now she's stating that she doesn't want her stuff floating around the net for free. That didn't stop her from posting her g/g stuff or her solo stuff...why is the b/g different?

I really think that she is just testing the water here on nakedchat. She wants to see how comfortable she is with men on camera and that's ok...but that isn't going to be enough for the majority of her fans.

Oh, one last comment about not wanting her scenes distributed for free...there are programs like replay media catcher out there which allow people to record cam shows. Sooner or later someone will do this and host her web shows for free and Karlie will have made less money for it than she would have hosting it on her own site (Nakedchat pays their models a really small amount of that pay per minute fee).

Juuuuust sayin...
 
I saw some minutes of Karlie's b/g show on NakedChat. For the money, I have to say it was only OK. For those who didn't see, it was IR with a friend of hers. The bj was good but ol' boy couldn't get it up. The sex was shot woith him from from behind Karlie and I am skeptical that he was able to perform. It was also quite dark and tough to see and had quite a few tech glitches. Karlie, please do your hardcore boy/girl right. Give your fans something to see and be proud of.
 
If she posts some seens to her site, ill be a new subscriber. But from what I read her shes still toying with the idea and hasnt truly gone b/g. I hope she does go some more b/g especially the IR but im not going to hold my breath.
 
If she posts some seens to her site, ill be a new subscriber. But from what I read her shes still toying with the idea and hasnt truly gone b/g. I hope she does go some more b/g especially the IR but im not going to hold my breath.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\
After writing the above I went out and researched some Karlie hoping to find some B/G of her. My RESPECT for her has risen to an all time high!
Why?!? I found 2 scenes that were aka b/g one was called Porcelain the other was unknown but was supposedly was with Mick Blue, Porcelain involved her and a cock and she never quite sucked the cock but was one hell of a tease, then with Mick blue there was no penetration but the guy rubbed her Vag and fingered her pretty damn well. Now im one who likes to watch the ladies fuck BUT I also respect a good tease especially when it gets closer and closer to what you want to see.

It looked like Karlie was having fun in the vids and that what I would expect to see on her website, a slow progression to b/g but doing it the way I think she would be comfortable in and allowing her to be creative. Then when she is really in the mood for some serious b/g that would be amazing. I would never want to see her take the Priya Rai route where she just goes in and becomes a super whore complete with big tits and all.

Currently I think Karlie may be on the right track with the les, pics and slow progression to b/g. I like her sexy body, her fun spirit and even the little tease she is.

Good Luck Karlie
 
We all know porn is a huge ripoff. How many times have we purchased compilation dvds/vhs movies where the girl on the cover wasn't even in the movie? And how many sites out there (ariavalentino.com is an example) say "HD hardcore movies inside" and the videos are crappy standard def? Visit donna-duke.com and you'll see it says hardcore videos inside and all of the videos are 3 minute long solo videos! I could go on and on...

Pornstars and porn makers do not care about the fans. We are not fans anyway! We just beat off to their stuff. That's it! It's obvious Karlie doesn't care about giving her "fans" what they want. She is just fucking on webcam site that charges way too much and at the same time she gets to keep a low profile when it comes to her hardcore stuff.

You cannot stop online piracy and the spread of porn videos. It's impossible. If a girl is gonna do porn then just do it and don't even think about the money you're not making....think about the money you ARE making or could be making from those people who ARE willing to pay. Girls who do hardcore make way more money than girls who do solo and they work a lot less. To the mainstream media and everyone else, a solo nude model is no "better" than a hardcore porn star. Jaime Hammer is considered to be in "porn" even if she doesn't fuck guys in movies. She doesn't get any greater "respect" than a Jenna Haze. But Jaime sure makes a LOT LESS than Jenna. In the end both will be considered porn girls. The only difference is that Jenna will be living in a big house and Jaime will be in an apartment in the valley.
 
To the mainstream media and everyone else, a solo nude model is no "better" than a hardcore porn star. Jaime Hammer is considered to be in "porn" even if she doesn't fuck guys in movies. She doesn't get any greater "respect" than a Jenna Haze. But Jaime sure makes a LOT LESS than Jenna. In the end both will be considered porn girls. The only difference is that Jenna will be living in a big house and Jaime will be in an apartment in the valley.

I'm surprised you have inside knowledge about how much money both Jenna Haze and Jamie Hammer make.:1orglaugh You would be surprised about how much money the very top non-hardcore people make. A couple of top adult models don't even have to pose nude.

In any case even if they don't receive any more respect, they certainly receive a lot less ridicule and social stigma not to mention potential pitfalls from their career later in life. Most of the people can look past somebody taking their clothes of in the past to have pictures taken of them. Having sex with other people on film is a deal breaker to a lot more people ranging from future potential people that they might want to have a relationship with to future potential employers. In any case the vast majority of pornstars at the level of Jenna Haze would probably trade careers in an instant with the career paths of the top erotic adult models if they could pull it off and be successful. The reason they don't is because unlike them they can't do it.
 
Top