I suppose the best way to think of it..
Could you (if it came to it) successfully convince a judge/jury that already owning a recording and subsequently downloading it, does not actually deprive the record company of a sale?
Could you argue that the download was for a 'back-up' purposes and was not an attempt to 'share' the recording, or to gain something that you had not already had ownership of?
I think that the people from whom you downloaded the recording from, would be in rather more trouble, after all, it is not legal to share, but 'backing-up' your own recording is.
Could you (if it came to it) successfully convince a judge/jury that already owning a recording and subsequently downloading it, does not actually deprive the record company of a sale?
Could you argue that the download was for a 'back-up' purposes and was not an attempt to 'share' the recording, or to gain something that you had not already had ownership of?
I think that the people from whom you downloaded the recording from, would be in rather more trouble, after all, it is not legal to share, but 'backing-up' your own recording is.