Iranian General Qassim Soleimani: "The sands will run red with infidel blo.."

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
Great. 2020 is starting off with the US illegally attacking other countries and provoking a major war.
Putting all of our lives in danger. Now all we need is a good old false flag attack to fool the people.
Maybe 2020 is the year israel gets what its wanted and even has demanded over the years....a war between Iran and the US.
 
The military-industrial complex, right now :

b900247673754cc63e5e9fd0c6001812.jpg
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
Iran was a dictatorship to start with, aside radical islamism, strong antisemitism and lynching homosexual people, it was never a true democracy. Let's not forgte that the Iranians have backed up radical islamic terrorist groups and praised the destruction of Israel.

Top Iranian Leaders Vow All Sorts of 'Crushing Revenge' Against America After Soleimani Strike
https://www.westernjournal.com/top-...ushtraffic URL to Post&ff_content=2020-01-02

Pelosi and Schiff Complain That Trump Didn't Consult Them Before Soleimani Strike
https://www.westernjournal.com/pelo...ushtraffic URL to Post&ff_content=2020-01-02 seriously who cares of these twats :thefinger:

DeSoto: Baghdad Attack Confirms Key Difference Between Trump and Obama Is Sheer Competence
https://www.westernjournal.com/deso...ushtraffic URL to Post&ff_content=2020-01-02

Trump Sanctions Have Cost Iran Billions More Than Obama Gave Them for the Nuclear Deal
https://www.westernjournal.com/trum...ushtraffic URL to Post&ff_content=2020-01-02
 
Last edited:

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
So what False Flag Attack to be blamed on Iran in order to escalate this thing will happen soon?
A bombing?
A mass killing spree?
A gassing?
Maybe shooting down a passenger plane?
An attack on a military base?
Perhaps something more creative like a new Pearl Harbor type event?
I guess we'll find out soon, I mean the headlines are telling us something will happen.

I'll tell though, its a funny funny thing. How a country who goes around blowing people up can call other countries terrorists.
 
So what False Flag Attack to be blamed on Iran in order to escalate this thing will happen soon?
A bombing?
A mass killing spree?
A gassing?
Maybe shooting down a passenger plane?
An attack on a military base?
Perhaps something more creative like a new Pearl Harbor type event?
I guess we'll find out soon, I mean the headlines are telling us something will happen.

I'll tell though, its a funny funny thing. How a country who goes around blowing people up can call other countries terrorists.

My guess is a missile into an American warship or a major strike on the saudis or Israelis.
But I’m thinking the first is the most obvious..
 
zeeblofowl_1969 said:
Why was a General of elite military units from Iran in Iraq anyway???
How was this even allowed??
All I can say is bullseye!!!
He was acompanied by Abou Mehdi al-Mouhandis, the 2nd-in-command of Hachd al-Chaabi, a coalition of mainly pro-Iran paramilitaries now integrated into the Iraqi state (who was killed as well). So I guess the reason he was in Iraq is because of that.

Let's not forgte that the Iranians have backed up radical islamic terrorist groups

*cough* Saudi Arabia *cough*
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
My guess is a missile into an American warship or a major strike on the saudis or Israelis.
But I’m thinking the first is the most obvious..

Ok.
Lets say for example the planet Romulus and its good friend Israelus wanted to start a war with the planet Vulcan but they needed an excuse to do so.
They would need to do it in a way in which they would be considered by most to be the victims who are only defending themselves from those terrible Vulcans, otherwise the Romulan people would not support such a war.

A great way to do this would be for the Romulan government to openly kill a top Vulcan leader and claim self defense for an action not yet taken ( aka.The Baby Hitler Theory)
Then have the entire Romulan mainstream media post headlines claiming and warning of nothing but Vulcan retaliation.
Such as Vulcan Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After Romulus Kills General and
Israelus Military on Heightened Alert After Romulan Killing of Vulcan Commander

Then a few days later Romulus goes and bombs a building or drops a gas bomb or shoots up a Romulan gay bar or something in one of their own cities and blames the Vulcans'
Now they have an excuse to bomb the shit out of the Vulcan people.

How easy would that be?
Easy as can be when the people of Romulus have no clue as to how to think for themselves anymore thanks to decades of Romulan government lies and propaganda.
 
Ok.
Lets say for example the planet Romulus and its good friend Israelus wanted to start a war with the planet Vulcan but they needed an excuse to do so.
They would need to do it in a way in which they would be considered by most to be the victims who are only defending themselves from those terrible Vulcans, otherwise the Romulan people would not support such a war.

A great way to do this would be for the Romulan government to openly kill a top Vulcan leader and claim self defense for an action not yet taken ( aka.The Baby Hitler Theory)
Then have the entire Romulan mainstream media post headlines claiming and warning of nothing but Vulcan retaliation.
Such as Vulcan Vows ‘Forceful Revenge’ After Romulus Kills General and
Israelus Military on Heightened Alert After Romulan Killing of Vulcan Commander

Then a few days later Romulus goes and bombs a building or drops a gas bomb or shoots up a Romulan gay bar or something in one of their own cities and blames the Vulcans'
Now they have an excuse to bomb the shit out of the Vulcan people.

How easy would that be?
Easy as can be when the people of Romulus have no clue as to how to think for themselves anymore thanks to decades of Romulan government lies and propaganda.

Mr. Spock would kick Romulus ass!!!
Cue the Captain Kirk fight music.
 

Supafly

Retired Mod
Bronze Member
Well, it's election year, and Trump needs to get voters behind him.

Easiest fix:

Start a war. Always works, if against a vile enemy.

He does everything by the book right now, regarding the attack to get the enemy rolling.

Really doesn't matter if there was danger at hand or not, Saddam didn't have WOMDs, too
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
Well, it's election year, and Trump needs to get voters behind him.

Easiest fix:

Start a war. Always works, if against a vile enemy.

He does everything by the book right now, regarding the attack to get the enemy rolling.

Really doesn't matter if there was danger at hand or not, Saddam didn't have WOMDs, too

Yeah, I would have agreed with that a few years ago. Like 10 years ago. But the thing is starting a war now is not going to help Trump get re-elected (Thats assuming the elections aren't rigged which they are 100%).
By the way you are not the 1st person I've heard say that in the past 24 hours.

Its not 2003 anymore. Most people even the ones with their 2003 heads still up their asses at least have a sense that all the post 2001 attacks and invasions by the US were set up and orchestrated based on a lie.
Most still don't have the guts to admit even to themselves ...... but inside they know.

People don't want war and most people in the usa do not consider Iran a threat or an enemy.

And notice how the US media who has been critical of everything TRUMP in the past 4 years is not completely blasting him over an attack that supposedly he ordered, an attack that could create a major war?
They criticize him for literally everything, but for possibly starting a war that could get millions killed they barely say JACK SQUAT!!!
Why not?
Don't answer. I'll tell you. It's because underneath all the bullshit scripted Crazy Donald Show they are on the same side and always have been since day one. And the media knows the only decisions they allow the PREZ to make is whats for dinner tonight.

I don't know what they have planned but I do know that this recent bullshit move by the USA has nothing to do with the 2020 elections. That already know who their puppet will be.
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
I don't expect world peace this year then

I've never expected it. The year after all the hoomans are gone, then there'll be world peace.

Course, even then there's that long running beef between the dolphins and the sharks. You'd think that after a few million years they could work things out.
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
Pompeo: Soleimani Was ‘Imminent’ Threat, Weren’t About to Send Pallets of Cash
https://thepoliticalinsider.com/pom...265680b20e543dc2a6473c7b9fa19141&source=TPICI

Iran’s Khamenei Taunted Trump Before Soleimani Strike: ‘You Can’t Do Anything’
https://www.breitbart.com/national-...daily&utm_campaign=20200103&utm_content=Final

Quds Force Leader Qasem Soleimani’s Death Marks Huge Blow to Iranian Regime
https://www.breitbart.com/national-...daily&utm_campaign=20200103&utm_content=Final

Iran Replaces Terror Chief Soleimani with ‘Uncharismatic and Less Distinguished’ General
https://www.breitbart.com/middle-ea...m_term=best_of_the_week&utm_campaign=20200104
 
Last edited:
Off course Suleimani was a horrible person no one would argue with that. But the question here is "Is Suleimani's elimination a good thing for the interests of America and its allies in the region ?".
And the answer is "No".
Every US citizen in the region is now in serious danger to suffer from the consequences of Iran's response, particulary US military. Israel is at risk too.

Some might say "If they kill one of our boys, we would kill 10 of theirs, 10 of theirs, 1,000 of theirs". And I know that, for those who think like that, iranian civilian deaths do not count.
But even if you answer by killing 1,000 iranians, was it worth having one american boy coming back home in a body-bag ? I know these people would kill 1,000,000 iranian to spare on US live. My question to them is "Would you sign up for one US boy killed in exchange for 1,000 iranians killed ? Or would you rather spare all these lives ?"
 
Mike Pence pushes 9/11 conspiracy theories to justify Suleimani killing

In a series of tweets, US vice-president falsely claims Iran general assisted in travel of terrorists behind September 11 attacks



In defense of his administration’s decision to assassinate Qassem Suleimani, Mike Pence has been promoting conspiracy theories that link September 11 terrorists to Iran.
In a series of tweets, the US vice-president called Suleimani “an evil man who was responsible for killing thousands of Americans”. Among other things, Pence insisted that the general “assisted in the clandestine travel to Afghanistan of 10 of the 12 terrorists who carried out the September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States”, misstating the number of 9/11 hijackers – there were 19 – and insinuating Suleimani’s involvement despite a lack of evidence.

The official 9/11 commission report found there was “no evidence that Iran or Hezbollah was aware of the planning for what later became the 9/11 attack”, and that 15 out of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, and the remainder were from the United Arab Emirates, Lebanon and Egypt. Moreover, Suleimani’s name is never mentioned in the nearly 600-page report.
Experts have also pointed out that Suleimani, a Shia leader, would have been an unlikely ally to the Sunni militants that carried out the attacks.

This isn’t the first time that the Trump administration and supporters have promoted a link between al-Qaida – the group that launched the 9/11 attack – and Iran. Insisting that these groups are in cahoots could be key in legally justifying a war against Iran.
A 2001 law allows the president “to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons” – without waiting for congressional approval.

Though Iran, and its proxy group Hezbollah in Lebanon, has cooperated with al-Qaida before, both the 9/11 commission report and a 2018 study by the New America thinktank, based on roughly 470,000 declassified files found that the groups didn’t work together to commit terrorist acts.

Despite criticism from policy experts, Pence’s press secretary, Kate Walderman, later doubled down on the claim that Suleimani somehow assisted the 9/11 hijackers, but did not offer evidence.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/03/mike-pence-iran-911-suleimani


The VP falsely connecting the enemy to 9/11. Sounds familiar...
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
Off course Suleimani was a horrible person no one would argue with that. But the question here is "Is Suleimani's elimination a good thing for the interests of America and its allies in the region ?".
And the answer is "No".
Every US citizen in the region is now in serious danger to suffer from the consequences of Iran's response, particulary US military. Israel is at risk too.

Some might say "If they kill one of our boys, we would kill 10 of theirs, 10 of theirs, 1,000 of theirs". And I know that, for those who think like that, iranian civilian deaths do not count.
But even if you answer by killing 1,000 iranians, was it worth having one american boy coming back home in a body-bag ? I know these people would kill 1,000,000 iranian to spare on US live. My question to them is "Would you sign up for one US boy killed in exchange for 1,000 iranians killed ? Or would you rather spare all these lives ?"

Suleimani was a Hizbollah back up so anyone siding and helping Hizbollah and proning attacks on American embassies or military assets should be eliminated.

From the link I previously posted https://www.breitbart.com/national-...daily&utm_campaign=20200103&utm_content=Final
“The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), led by Suleimani, was responsible for the deaths of more than 600 Americans in Iraq between 2003-2011, and countless more injured. He was a chief architect behind Iran’s continuing reign of terror in the region. This strike against one of the world’s most odious terrorists is no different than the mission which took out Osama bin Laden – it is, in fact, even more justifiable since he was in a foreign country directing terrorist attacks against Americans,” he said.

According to local reports, the U.S. airstrikes also killed Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the founder of Kata’ib Hizballah and leader of the network of Iranian-controlled Shia militia groups in Iraq known as the Popular Mobilization Forces.

“It’s an incredible two-fer,” Smyth said. “This is another one of those old hands. These guys don’t grow on trees. It takes time.”

The U.S. airstrikes also reportedly killed the public relations chief for the umbrella group of Iran-controlled Shia militia in Iraq, the Popular Mobilization Forces, Mohammed Ridha Jabri, as well. Smyth said Jabri had some significance to the militia network as a spokesman, but his death would not be of the same significance as Soleimani or al-Muhandis.

A good terrorist is a dead one. Obama was apologizing and bending towards Iran something Trump doesn't do. Don't worry for Israel, they have defeated Arabs in the 6 days war, the Yom Kippour, they have rescued back a hi jacked plane back in Entebbe in 1976, destroyed Osirak Nuclear Plant in 1984 and many many other things. They have the Iron dome, David's Sling, Arrow II and III ballistic missiles in order to strike Iran or any other hostile regime.
 
Top