meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
yep
Iranian General Qassim Soleimani: "The sands will run red with infidel blo.."
- Thread starter Rey C.
- Start date
yep
Yes, sure the guardian
is another UK left wing journal which will always excuse the death of a potential ennemy of the US. Do you have any concrete proof that Suleimani wasn't involved? No, you don't, so please don't assume.
The burden of the proofs lies on the accuser, not the defender. I thought you'd know that. Pence accused Suleimani of being involved in 9/11, he needs to prove it.
That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence
Overall, we rate The Guardian Left-Center biased based on story selection that moderately favors the left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a reasonable fact check record.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/
That is way better than ANY of the sources you've ever mentioned ((breitbart, westernjournal, etc...)
That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence
Overall, we rate The Guardian Left-Center biased based on story selection that moderately favors the left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a reasonable fact check record.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/
That is way better than ANY of the sources you've ever mentioned ((breitbart, westernjournal, etc...)
No, it is not better at all, the left and the center don't like conservatives and I as well as several other people don't trust medias associated with the left nor even more the center. Iranian politicians always backed up radical islamists and have always been prone of severe anti americanism and hate of Americans since 1979.
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
Didn't take long for you guys to begin arguing over the shit they threw in your trough.
What is that? Bullshit stew? Yummy.
What is that? Bullshit stew? Yummy.
Trump Warns Iran Against Revenge Attack, Says 52 Iranian Sites Would Be Hit ‘Very Fast And Very Hard’
https://dailycaller.com/2020/01/04/...ush&utm_source=daily_caller&utm_campaign=push
Zumwalt: Soleimani’s Demise Could End Iran’s Long, One-Way War with America
https://www.breitbart.com/middle-ea...=todays_hottest_stories&utm_campaign=20200104
Watch Live: Leftists Outside White House Protest U.S. Elimination of Terrorist Soleimani
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...=todays_hottest_stories&utm_campaign=20200104
‘Squad’ Accuses Trump of Leading U.S. to Brink of War with Iran
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...=todays_hottest_stories&utm_campaign=20200104
https://dailycaller.com/2020/01/04/...ush&utm_source=daily_caller&utm_campaign=push
Zumwalt: Soleimani’s Demise Could End Iran’s Long, One-Way War with America
https://www.breitbart.com/middle-ea...=todays_hottest_stories&utm_campaign=20200104
Watch Live: Leftists Outside White House Protest U.S. Elimination of Terrorist Soleimani
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...=todays_hottest_stories&utm_campaign=20200104
‘Squad’ Accuses Trump of Leading U.S. to Brink of War with Iran
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...=todays_hottest_stories&utm_campaign=20200104
Last edited:
YES, it is
- Overall, we rate The Guardian Left-Center biased based on story selection that moderately favors the left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a reasonable fact check record.
- Overall, we rate the Daily Caller strongly right biased based on story selection that almost always favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks.
The Daily Caller is a source that needs to be fact checked on a per article basis.
- Overall, we rate Bizpac Review Right Biased based on story selection and editorial position that almost always favor the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to use of poor sources, misleading loaded language and three failed fact checks.
- Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks
- Overall, we rate Lifezette Right biased based on story selection that always favors the right and denigrates the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the promotion of conspiracy theories and a poor fact check record.
Lifezette is one failed fact check away from moving to the Questionable source list
- Overall, we rate The Political Insider Questionable based on Extreme Right Wing Bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, a lack of transparency and a few failed fact checks
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/
And so does Saudi Arabia (except they pretend not to) but that doesn't seem to have bothered any Us president : wether Democrat or Republican they all end up bowing to the Saudi prince in exchange for cheap oil
Also, the Irani government is Shia Islam, nearly every jihadi organisation in Sunni Islam. Shi and Sunni muslims have been at each other's throats for centuries (that's the reason for the proxy wars between Saudia Arabnia and Iran). Why would Iran back Al-Qaeda or Daech ? The truth is Suleimani fought Daech/ISIS
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...against-isis-taliban/articleshow/73093126.cms
Let's not forget that Suleimani was a deterrent for talibans and oter jihadis in Iraq and that, with the US pulling out some of their troops to avoid being target by Iran's retaliation, these jihadis can now act almost freely.
Congratulations, Mr. President, in one single move you've bolstered Iran's will to target the US and you've alos deeply weakened your allies in the region :suicide:
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST!
Why the fuck is everybody making this about Trump?
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump.
This is why they installed the actor, so no matter what happens its all about Trump and everybody could sit around and argue over him.
THE US FUCKING GOVERNMENT DID THIS.
The US GOV.
Trump doesn't make these decisions. He doesn't control the government for fucks sake. HE'S A FUCKING ACTOR.
I look on facebook and its the same thing. Everybody arguing over Trump.
Its fucking sad how conditioned people are.
It was the same when Bush II was PREZ with Iraq.
Why the fuck is everybody making this about Trump?
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump.
This is why they installed the actor, so no matter what happens its all about Trump and everybody could sit around and argue over him.
THE US FUCKING GOVERNMENT DID THIS.
The US GOV.
Trump doesn't make these decisions. He doesn't control the government for fucks sake. HE'S A FUCKING ACTOR.
I look on facebook and its the same thing. Everybody arguing over Trump.
Its fucking sad how conditioned people are.
It was the same when Bush II was PREZ with Iraq.
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
So what does that tell you about the US GOVERNMENT?
Why do they always fight attack and/or kill the people and countries who are actually opposed to or are fighting the people who supposedly did 9/11?
Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Iran.
If these countries are fighting our (The US) enemy , then why isn't the US helping them instead of bombing them and killing their leaders?
(while they give Saudi Arabia scores of billions of dollars in weaponry. What do they do with all those arms?)
There is only one answer to that.
The boogeyman who the US calls their enemy and spends trillions of borrowed dollars to "keep us safe" from them are actually working for the US GOV.
Going all the way back to 9/11 and before.
Proxy armies of bearded mercenaries.
They need an enemy in order to function and profit from. This is their product. Its what they sell.
And its been like that since way before Trump had anything to do with it.
And anybody who opposes "our enemy" will be stopped one way or another.
I hate to say it but it does appear that has been on the Trump/Bibi docket since the day Trump got elected, with ever increasing and compounding provocations pushing it forward.
I think Trump would PREFER to foment regime change via revolution from within based on the angst and upheavel economic sanctions are causing, but if it takes a hot war instead then so be it.
Such a pity. For nearly two years relations with Iran were - while hardly ideal - the best they'd been in decades. Then we elected Trump who mindlessly dumped the nuke deal and now here we are quite possibly on the precipice of something truly catastrophic.
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
All true except I don't give Trump any of the credit.
0.00%.
Let me just step up on this box for a minute.
Go back in time and we had LBJ and Nixon and Ford.......all inside men from the 40's/50's era.
Then somehow Carter got in their but they turned on him pretty damn quick and he got the boot.
Then Reagan for 8 years. But it was really Mr. Personality and LBJ/Nixon/Ford era inside man CIA George who called the shots for 12 years.
Hell Reagan had freaking Alzheimers all that while, but he fit into the uniform perfectly.
Then inside man and fellow Bush criminal Clintons for 8 years.
Then CIA George's freaking goofy son for 8 more years.
All inside men (except the Peanut Farmer) for 45 freaking years at that point.
Then some of us started catching on thanks in part to The Great George Carlin so they started to go with actors instead.
Give the people the false hope and perception that they still have a choice.
Made In The CIA Barry Soetoro and his fake family for 8 years then the ultimate villian and actor extraordinaire Donald Trump for 8 years.
Not inside men but they don't need inside men any more, all they need is passable actors who can fit into the uniform and read a script with semi proficient capability.
Oh and an entire compromised media to push the deception instead of exposing it like they were meant to do back in the 17 and 1800's
So yeah Trump had nothing to do with it, people give him way too much credit.
Thanks PH for having the gumption to say that it seems this was the plan the whole time. Because you know we are not supposed to say it even though they haven't exactly been hiding their intentions in the least bit.
It is a pity. The more peace the less money for the ones in real power and the less peace the more money. And money=power.
0.00%.
Let me just step up on this box for a minute.
Go back in time and we had LBJ and Nixon and Ford.......all inside men from the 40's/50's era.
Then somehow Carter got in their but they turned on him pretty damn quick and he got the boot.
Then Reagan for 8 years. But it was really Mr. Personality and LBJ/Nixon/Ford era inside man CIA George who called the shots for 12 years.
Hell Reagan had freaking Alzheimers all that while, but he fit into the uniform perfectly.
Then inside man and fellow Bush criminal Clintons for 8 years.
Then CIA George's freaking goofy son for 8 more years.
All inside men (except the Peanut Farmer) for 45 freaking years at that point.
Then some of us started catching on thanks in part to The Great George Carlin so they started to go with actors instead.
Give the people the false hope and perception that they still have a choice.
Made In The CIA Barry Soetoro and his fake family for 8 years then the ultimate villian and actor extraordinaire Donald Trump for 8 years.
Not inside men but they don't need inside men any more, all they need is passable actors who can fit into the uniform and read a script with semi proficient capability.
Oh and an entire compromised media to push the deception instead of exposing it like they were meant to do back in the 17 and 1800's
So yeah Trump had nothing to do with it, people give him way too much credit.
Thanks PH for having the gumption to say that it seems this was the plan the whole time. Because you know we are not supposed to say it even though they haven't exactly been hiding their intentions in the least bit.
It is a pity. The more peace the less money for the ones in real power and the less peace the more money. And money=power.
Well you're welcome Mr P, but I don't think it's been the plan "the whole time". On the contrary I think it's very clear the Obama administration hoped to de-escalate tensions with Iran and was attaining results in that direction. But then the Cunt Of The Deal got elected and, hand in hand with Bibi, immediately began tearing down any good that had been done.
I don't say this because I'm anti-Israel. Actually for the most part I'm pretty much bullish about Israel as a people and a nation. But Netenyahu is a disaster as their PM.
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
I'm not disagreeing........too much,maybe a little.
See I do think Iran was on the list going at least back to at least 1999 but the timing wasn't right.
And under Obama they just ran out of time. His 1st term he was the hope and change guy for like 2 years. Then they F-ed up Libya and killed their leader.
After that it was Syria (by use of the same bearded mercenaries they used in Libya) but they just couldn't get it done in time thanks in part to Iran.
So for whatever reason I guess now is the right time to finally go for Iran.
Then again this whole thing could be bullshit. Who the heck knows anymore?
At least thats how I see it.
BTW has Russia or China or anybody said anything about this latest fiasco? Seems odd if they haven't, unless they know something we don't.
See I do think Iran was on the list going at least back to at least 1999 but the timing wasn't right.
And under Obama they just ran out of time. His 1st term he was the hope and change guy for like 2 years. Then they F-ed up Libya and killed their leader.
After that it was Syria (by use of the same bearded mercenaries they used in Libya) but they just couldn't get it done in time thanks in part to Iran.
So for whatever reason I guess now is the right time to finally go for Iran.
Then again this whole thing could be bullshit. Who the heck knows anymore?
At least thats how I see it.
BTW has Russia or China or anybody said anything about this latest fiasco? Seems odd if they haven't, unless they know something we don't.
Supafly
Retired Mod
To me, the whole affair looks more and more like the textbook pubilicity/election prep stunt that presidents have used time and again to overcome shaky standings with their electorate
But an hilarious detail is the demand that Iran should pay for all costs of the US stationed troups etc, should they demand them to leave the country after this attack
But an hilarious detail is the demand that Iran should pay for all costs of the US stationed troups etc, should they demand them to leave the country after this attack
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
Yeah but starting a war with Iran isn't going to help Trump get votes (assuming the elections are not rigged).
Its not the early 2000's anymore. There was no major attack involved. Most Americans have no beef with Iran and do not support starting any kind of war with them.
But a publicity stunt it may be. All kinds of stuff is happening with Netanyahoo and thanks to this latest "stunt" its not being covered by the news much.
But an hilarious detail is the demand that Iran should pay for all costs of the US stationed troups etc, should they demand them to leave the country after this attack
Whats that Sup? Tell me more ,tell me more?
Question for anybody: Is there any video or photos of the killing of the General, or photos or video of the aftermath that show him dead?
Supafly
Retired Mod
As usual, you'r eright, he got a fresh haircut, has now blonde hair, and was seen in Mar-E-Lago
Fun fact:
He sat at Don's table as the hit on him was ordered per tweet
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
haha funny stuff was said just now, right?
I was just asking cause you know, back when OBAMA killed BIN LADEN and buried him at sea you all believed that without any proof.
And right before an election was it?
So is there any photographic or videographic proof? Just wondering.
That's all I was asking.
ASSUME NOTHING
I was just asking cause you know, back when OBAMA killed BIN LADEN and buried him at sea you all believed that without any proof.
And right before an election was it?
So is there any photographic or videographic proof? Just wondering.
That's all I was asking.
ASSUME NOTHING
