They have had them since the 70s. Today one expert on TV said they have between 100-300 warheads.
chances to use nukes go first on Israel then others.
They have had them since the 70s. Today one expert on TV said they have between 100-300 warheads.
You have to be kidding me!
They have the rockets etc and they have the warheads, they just do not have them fitted together, so they do not have to lie when they say: "We do not have nuclear missiles."
But those two items are put together in a snap by highly trained personnel, and as we speak, our german-built submarines get set up to host a number of those combinations. No attack on Israel will remain without a wipeout of the very same country that attacked them.
I am glad they have them.
My alternative? Enforce the embargoes and sanctions that were in place for a reason. Negotiate for the release of the Americans held hostage there. Let them know if they do something really stupid we'll either back Israel's play or take care of business our damn selves. Monitor their support for of terrorist organizations and actually do something about it.
Stompy Foot et al just negotiated with the fucking people who supplied weapons, IEDs and ideology that cost many of my friends their lives and limbs. They didn't negotiate for America, the west, democracy, freedom or peace; they negotiated for Iran.
The sanctions and embargoes were on the way out whether or not this deal was made. The United States doesn't do enough business with Iran to make sanctions and embargoes solely by US work. I suppose the Republican super candidate could impose American Will on Iran through Magick, the power of the Christian GOD, and 'Merica, so maybe you're right, after all.
I don't think you understand that more American lives would be lost in a military conflict with Iran and that diplomacy is a better solution. The REAL reason so many Republicans are coming out against this deal is because Iran has 30 Million Barrels of Oil sitting in it's stockpiles waiting to be shipped with the potential to crank up their production and flood the market, which would drive the prices down and cut into the profits of the big oil companies that own the GOP.
How do you figure it's a false dichotomy when the facts support it? What this deal does is defer war with the hope that it can be avoided. The course of events as they were guaranteed war, this deal stops it for now, but we better be working our asses off going forward for a permanent peace and not squandering the opportunity to prevent a nuclear holocaust in that region. This deal certainly isn't the end of the peace process, but it gives all parties a chance to cool off and rethink their strategy going forward because the war that was certainly coming has at least been postponed. If you think the Obama administration is so naive that they don't understand this you should probably stop listening to the people that are telling you they are.
I was going to say ramp up the sanctions or just keep them as is. And if the sanctions were going to collapse anyways, what brought the Iranians to the negotiating table?
The sanctions. That was the whole point of the sanctions, to get Iran to the negotiating table. Sanctions hit the Iranian working class and middle class. They don't affect the people who actually run the country.
The sanctions and embargoes were on the way out whether or not this deal was made. The United States doesn't do enough business with Iran to make sanctions and embargoes solely by US work. I suppose the Republican super candidate could impose American Will on Iran through Magick, the power of the Christian GOD, and 'Merica, so maybe you're right, after all.
I don't think you understand that more American lives would be lost in a military conflict with Iran and that diplomacy is a better solution. The REAL reason so many Republicans are coming out against this deal is because Iran has 30 Million Barrels of Oil sitting in it's stockpiles waiting to be shipped with the potential to crank up their production and flood the market, which would drive the prices down and cut into the profits of the big oil companies that own the GOP.
I understand full well exactly what that course of action entails. We should have fucking blasted that god forsaken country back in 1979 but Jimmy Carter was too big a pussy. Instead, they've had 36 years to ramp up their anti-western anti-America rhetoric. The leadership over there leads the cheer "Death to America" every fucking day, and probably not without reason; They knew the CIA was fucking around with them since after WWII and having the Shah trying to modernize that backward-assed shithole with American backing was probably really stupid as well.
Rolling over and putting our ass up for them to fuck is the worst diplomatic solution since Neville Chamberlain thought the Nazis were just misunderstood.
Sometimes violence is the answer.
And this this snap back sanctions provision if Iran doesn't comply (that can be verified) is a joke. If the sanctions were collapsing anyways what makes you think they would be reinstated?
The REAL reason so many Republicans are coming out against this deal is because Iran has 30 Million Barrels of Oil sitting in it's stockpiles waiting to be shipped with the potential to crank up their production and flood the market, which would drive the prices down and cut into the profits of the big oil companies that own the GOP.
And this this snap back sanctions provision if Iran doesn't comply (that can be verified) is a joke. If the sanctions were collapsing anyways what makes you think they would be reinstated?
And this this snap back sanctions provision if Iran doesn't comply (that can be verified) is a joke. If the sanctions were collapsing anyways what makes you think they would be reinstated?
And they're right back at it.
http://news.yahoo.com/iran-leader-vows-opposition-u-despite-nuclear-deal-051938755.html