Well, Epicurus questions are just that, questions. Questions that humans require detailed answers for. What if somethings are just as simple as 'In the beginning, God greated the Heavens and the Earth'? Just because the answer isn't complicated, doesn't mean it isn't possible.
It's actually incredibly complicated. It just is easily expressed. If the Universe has a beginning and God made it where does God come from? If he has no creator then why do we? Why does a perfect God create anything when he is already perfect?
Something that is perfect wouldn't create because it has everything. If he created us to worship him he is lacking the joys of being worshiped therefore he is imperfect.
Let's ask a more concrete question. How old is the Earth? If you're going by the Bible it estimates 10k years or so. Science says billions. Obviously there's a problem here, one of those is wrong. One is testable and can be challenged for as long as it's used (challenged and reconfirmed when it's found true again) and the other has to just be accepted without a second glance.
In essence the answer that God is just there raises more questions than it answers...unless you just ignore it completely. If we did that we'd still be in the Dark Ages. Also why should we not question things when we have the "God given" ability to do so?
Icewater Jones said:
'technically' and 'essentially' convey theoretical values, thus are not fact. This idea has never been proven, so it is on the same footing as religion ideally, as thought by atheists.
Theories are based around observable and repeatable instances found in nature. The only reason theories are left open ended is for the sake of new information that will further expand the view we already have of any particular subject. It doesn't leave the door open for it be refuted and then supplanted with an explanation that is personal opinion.
In this sense Gravity itself is "theoretical" yet we have a firm grasp on what is basically is don't we? No one argues that Gravity doesn't exist because it's a "theory".
Why isn't Creationism aka Intelligent Design taught in schools? Because it's goal was to get rid of Evolution not to explain the things we see happening before our eyes.
Icewater Jones said:
There it is, religious 'people'... and what do we know about people? They have they're own agendas and fears. Though I am Christian, I have been labled a free-thinker in that community, but the beauty of faith based concepts is that you can be that. I don't put a lot of stock in what people put out there as it pertains to my belief.
That's good I'm glad you're open minded. Although I wouldn't consider you a Freethinker but perhaps more of a Deist. In my references to "religious people" I had people in mind that were more true to the doctrine and more literal in their studies. Those people are still the mainstream of the religious base. They differ in opinions from one sect to the next but they all interpret largely the same texts and circumvent outside influence to a large degree.
Icewater Jones said:
Exactly. I'm in to hearing new opinions and insights from everyone because I know that when it comes to faith and science, there are gonna be clashes. It really comes down to how you take on tough questions. Some think they require tough answers, while folks like me think simple ones are it.
I agree but I see it more as in: Tough often equal's "hard to swallow". Occam's razor imo is key to keeping the debate sensible
Icewater Jones said:
But why do they have to be exclusive to have been originated from something? These ideas don't need to be exclusive to religion if they started there. I certainly didn't say they were.
The same reason you'd never see an Atheist person elected President...openly Atheist that is.
People are ingrained with the idea that religious faith keeps people inline and if they lack that they are wild cards and in a sense dangerous. Despite any evidence proving that.
Icewater Jones said:
Not any or every creature is human. Not any and every creature was created with that capability.
It's assumed that human conciousness is far and beyond that of any other species. There's a lot of evidence that other ******* are quite advanced. See:
Monkeys
lemurs
Apes
Whales
Dolphins
Birds - Not just parrots mimicking the human voice but also being able to distinguish shapes, color, and how many there is of something. Also Raven's making tools even more advanced than chimps and solving complex puzzles.
We've seen examples of prostitution, ****** and mourning the loss of a ***** in gorillas as well as making tools and taking medicine of sorts.
It's assumed only humans can do human things because we've often times never studied creatures with reflection to ourselves...for instance the scientist that named the structures of a birds brain used words that implied that they were stupid. Based solely on the idea that small brains = lower intelligence. It turns out that's not at all the case.
If one doesn't state from the very beginning that humanity is the center of the important things in life and is lord of it all. It's very hard to look at nature and come to that conclusion. Our successes over other species in the survival game is not proof that what we do is any better or different than what they do.
Because if we're measuring global dominance as a sign of superiority in a spiritual sense. Then the fact there's more bacteria in your guts than people on the planet proves they are the champs. Followed by perhaps insects.