Small government and fiscal responsibility :hatsoff:
In short, bingo. :thumbsup:
Small government and fiscal responsibility :hatsoff:
Shouting.
Pointing.
Something to do during between Nascar races.
Light beer.
The opposite of rap - whatever that is.
Things to put bullets in.
A chance to reminisce about the old days when you could throw on a sheet and cut a couple holes in a pillow case and have a good time.
Don't people still do that? :dunno:
Voicing outrage at out-of-touch politicians. We have plenty from both parties.
Isn't dissent patriotic? That's what the left cried on about during Shrubs 8 years?
Now people voice out against Obama and the left gets pissed. Note to the left...........get thicker skin, learn to deal with criticism.
I liked the Tea Party better when they were called teabaggers.
They're still called Tea Baggers
:nono: :tongue:
Small federal government and fiscal responsibility is a good thing.
Democrats = tax and spend
I agree with genuine Conservatives who espouse small government and fiscal responsibility. But I can't stand the 2 Faced fiscal NeoCon hypocrites who have outnumbered genuine Conservatives and taken over the GOP. During Bush's 8 years of his reign, he contradicted conservative doctrine by increasing the size, power and scope of the government and created a budget deficit that we and our grand children are going to pay for. Since NeoCons in office are not fiscally conservative and they're inconsistent with conservative fiscal philosophy of being fiscally responsibile and having a small government, I much prefer having Liberal leaders that are consistent with their liberal economic and social philosophy who are least likely to appoint NeoCon activist judges to the Supreme Court who are are also anti-gay rights, anti-abortion, anti-civil liberties and anti-civil rights and unwilling to sell out the country to the highest bidding corporations unlike the NeoCon activist judges who recently have official sold our country and government to foreign corporations.
Democrats who tax and spend at least say that's exactly what they are going to do and are consistent with that economic philosophy, unlike NeoCons who are inconsistent with Conservative philosophy and do the exact opposite thing of what they preach against and promise not to do
Yeah, it's called good old fashioned racism.
It's only "patriotic dissent" when they agree... when they don't, it's a bunch of "whackos".... and that goes for both sides :dunno:
No. It's only dissent when the opponents ACTUALLY HAVE SOMETHING to speak out against.
http://goeurope.about.com/cs/spain/l/bl_spain_ss_1.htm
C'mpn, at least be accurate...it's called Easter Week in all Latin countries, and especially in Spain.
That's called Religious History...not racism.
No. It's only dissent when the opponents ACTUALLY HAVE SOMETHING to speak out against.
What, exactly, has Obama done on his own? Ended the occupations? Nope. Instituted Universal Healthcare? Nope. Rammed home giant tax increases? Nope. Torn up NAFTA? Nope. Closed Gitmo? Yes, but...there's still no post-Gitmo plan. Big Company Bailout? Yes, but...the economy crashed on the campaign trail. Bush started the bailout process, Obama continued it and added on a Stimulus package. Most Liberals thought/still think the Stimulus was too small and won't be effective in the end.
By my scorecard, the wackoes have nothing to actually protest. We are still warmongering, still have the world's most expensive and useless healthcare system, still haven't done shit to get off of fossil fuel uses. Oh, Obama put the brakes on NASA. I guess that's something the Tea Baggers can go out and march against...:dunno::wave2: