FBI doesn't think osama did it??

[Namreg]

well i always wondered why there was never an investigation into the events of september 11th, and how exactly one could accuse bin laden of a crime when there had been no investigation, and what evidence had been gathered when, once again, there was no investigation to gather any evidence... i'm not saying he's a saint, but just now i came across his "most wanted" page at the FBI website:

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm

they say: "USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA, AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS ****ED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD."

notice how they avoid mentioning 9/11 entirely. is that strange or what?

 

[ChefChiTown]

But, Bin Laden openly admitted that he was responsible for 9/11.

 

[Namreg]

we're not discussing that, what i'm surprised about is the FBI.

 

[Kingfisher]

I'm not surprised by this. That whole thing is a shell game. Look over here in Afghanistan, opps, now look over here in Iraq, opps, now look over here in .............. (Fill in the blank)

 

[neighborboy]

The wanted poster was made in 1999. Mystery solved.

 

[Namreg]

The wanted poster was made in 1999. Mystery solved.

yes, the poster... but the page is the current FBI most wanted page, and you'll notice that at the bottom it says "updated in november 2001".

 

[hothannah]

The wanted poster was made in 1999. Mystery solved.

I'm not saying I think he did or didn't do it or was or wasn't involved, but I'm always skeptical of all rumours and even evidence nowadays because there is so much subterfuge and white washing going on by all sides and if I read your post alone I would think that poster was made in 1999.

However why say that and leave out that it also states that it was revised in November 2001?

I'm just using this as an example of how we can so easily be misdirected and mislead by incomplete evidence and how information is presented to us in all things.

 

[neighborboy]

I was wrong, sorry. To be listed on the Ten Most Wanted, you have to be indicted by a grand jury or prosecutor, and OBL has only been indicted by grand juries for the other attacks. No need for a grand jury indictment when you've got the army and CIA on the case already.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI_Ten_Most_Wanted_Fugitives

Bin Laden and al-Qaeda are responsible for the October 12, 2000, ****** on the USS Cole off the coast of Yemen, which ****ed 17. Although bin Laden later appeared on the first publicly released FBI Most Wanted Terrorists list on October 10, 2001, he was listed there for the 1998 embassy ******, and not for his alleged role in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks that ****ed nearly 3,000 people, because the most wanted lists name fugitives charged with a crime by a prosecutor or under indictment by a grand jury. Bin Laden was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in, for instance, the federal indictment against convicted terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui, but has not been formally indicted for his role in the September 11, 2001 attacks.

What gets me about this conspiracy theory stuff is first it is imagined that there is a giant, hugely sophisticated government conspiracy, but then this same conspiracy just goes and forgets something on a highly publicized website ... for eight years! As if the whole conspiracy could be unraveled by just clicking on a few websites!

 

[Apex]

sorry but just....
:rofl2:

 

[usmc071984]

funny thing about the legal system. when someone admits they are nice enough to not investigate whatsoever untill they have reasonalbe suspicion that the admittance is invalid.

 

[bodie54]

As if the whole conspiracy could be unraveled by just clicking on a few websites!

Exactly :1orglaugh

:thumbsup:

 

[Namreg]

what conspiracy? i'm saying the current, as of today, FBI top ten wanted list does not say that osama is responsible for 9/11. how is that a conspiracy?

 

[sdintegraracer]

this whole thing is sketch

 

[neighborboy]

funny thing about the legal system. when someone admits they are nice enough to not investigate whatsoever untill they have reasonalbe suspicion that the admittance is invalid.

What are you talking about?:dunno:

 

[Philbert]

well i always wondered why there was never an investigation into the events of september 11th, and how exactly one could accuse bin laden of a crime when there had been no investigation, and what evidence had been gathered when, once again, there was no investigation to gather any evidence... i'm not saying he's a saint, but just now i came across his "most wanted" page at the FBI website:

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm

they say: "USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA, AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS ****ED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD."

notice how they avoid mentioning 9/11 entirely. is that strange or what?

Namreq...you're one *** short of braindead.
There is a shitload of timelines, evidence, specific connections of all the major players...thousands of pages of documents on 911 and the related events; yet you actually post that there has been no investigation.
I must admit I am impressed at how hard you try to destroy any credibility you might have accrued by default on FreeOnes...since not everyone has read your posts.
:rofl2:

 

[Namreg]

please point me to an official, proper investigation into who is responsible for 9/11 by the FBI, CIA, port authority, or the NYPD. you won't find one, camembert.

also, as you have YET AGAIN misread a post (you seem to see only what you want to see so you can rip on others... for things that only exist in your mind), i never did say that osama wasn't responsible, i said the FBI failed to say so on their own most wanted list. "F" in english?

 

[Philbert]

please point me to an official, proper investigation into who is responsible for 9/11 by the FBI, CIA, port authority, or the NYPD. you won't find one, camembert.

also, as you have YET AGAIN misread a post (you seem to see only what you want to see so you can rip on others... for things that only exist in your mind), i never did say that osama wasn't responsible, i said the FBI failed to say so on their own most wanted list. "F" in english?

You're not hard to read, dude.
Official, proper investigation? Talk about things that exist only in your mind...:rofl:
I never did say that you said Osama was or wasn't responsible;" F " in English and reading comprehension.
You need to play with names to get your point across, Brainreq?
The probably most investigated event in at least recent American history, and you need an "official and proper" introduction to the fact...pathetic.

 

[Namreg]

Official, proper investigation? Talk about things that exist only in your mind...

my point exactly. there never was an investigation. also, you did write "There is a shitload of timelines, evidence, specific connections of all the major players...thousands of pages of documents on 911"... and yet you say in the next post that you never said that i inferred that osama was not responsible. then why write "There is a shitload of timelines, evidence, specific connections of all the major players...thousands of pages of documents on 911"? whose question are you answering? i think you need professional help. are you rush limbaugh?

 

[Philbert]

my point exactly. there never was an investigation. also, you did write "There is a shitload of timelines, evidence, specific connections of all the major players...thousands of pages of documents on 911"... and yet you say in the next post that you never said that i inferred that osama was not responsible. then why write "There is a shitload of timelines, evidence, specific connections of all the major players...thousands of pages of documents on 911"? whose question are you answering? i think you need professional help. are you rush limbaugh?

I think you took that one last ***...:thumbsup:

 

[neighborboy]

please point me to an official, proper investigation into who is responsible for 9/11 by the FBI, CIA, port authority, or the NYPD. you won't find one, camembert.

Why are you so obsessed with "official" investigations, and why isn't the 9/11 commission an official investigation? And if you don't think the 9/11 commission was an official investigation, or was somehow prone to corruption, why on earth would an investigation produced by the FBI, CIA, or NYPD be any better? Are you telling me you would believe an "official" FBI report? Why don't you see that you are demanding something be produced that you wouldn't believe anyway?