[1/2] I (sarcasm) love the lack of differentiation ...
To start, before I respond to others, I (sarcasm) utterly love the absolute lack of differentiation. "Fat chicks" has been used to classify some of the most beautiful women on the planet. I regularly catch men having "unexplained attraction" to the "odd fat chick" that seems "different" than the "other fat chicks." Now why is that?
I wrote most of the technical meat in the Wikipedia article Female Body Shape. Technically put, you can talk about the different shapes -- straight/rectangular/banana, spoon/pear/bell, those two being a good 80% of Anglo-American women, and then apple and the most rare hourglass shapes. Erotically, I want my hands horizontal and closer together when I feel her midsection, but I want my hands virtual when I'm "pulling her hips down" or "cupping her breasts up."
I learned long ago that visual reality was my ultimate fantasy. I started with busty women when I was a kid. But then started going after "thin blondes with tight asses" out of indirect peer pressure and social standing, of which I was frigid and even excused as "being respectable." After getting dumped for being frigid (my girlfriend cheated on me well before that, then just made it official), I got a Playboy, discovered Petra Verkaik, and thought it was her breasts.
But soon after dating the nicest, sweetest and fullest friend I had, I discovered it was ...
- Her extreme width
- Her extreme hourglass
I noticed it the first time she put on a teddy -- she has more width and hourglass form than the very attractive model in the catalogue. It was then I realized I wanted those wide, fanging hips surrounded by a narrow midsection but then going up to a good, wide chest and shoulders.
The fact that she was slender and mega-sized, F-cup busty were just "bonuses." Especially being that mammary intercourse -- tit-fucking -- was my newfound "safe sex," and because I liked wide, hourglass women, or at least stock, wide, apple women, they had breasts that were wide, so far more full. I finally realized what totally made me go from frigid to ultra pervert overnight! And I never stopped. I've been a fucking horny bastard since and, with only one exception early on, I never cared what the fuck other people thought -- it's my happiness at stake!
I really don't care for 99% of BBWs myself, and probably a good 75% of FFWs, even some of the more slender. Why? Because they are often pear/spoon shaped or straight, with weight going disportionately to their stomches or ass and not up as well or distributed wide. At the same time, some women are just so well designed, so wide and hourglass, that they can take on a shitload of weight and it won't go to their stomach for quite awhile. This includes women like Laura Orsolya and Autumn-Jade (love her 100x more full than thin) and Kerry Marie (until recently, she's finally hit a point where it is going to her stomach).
At the same time, there are very rare BBWs with very extreme hourglasses that still look hot and curvy enough, even with "too much weight." Extremely rare women like Samantha Anderson and Maria Moore -- the latter being one of my all-time favorites, even though I typically prefer more slender FFW. Hourglass and stocky apples that are wide just "take the weight better."
I met my stocky-apple, 5'3" wife at a size 6, 125lbs., 36-24-34. She's been as heavy as a size 20, over 200lbs., 42F-30-40. She's probably most ideal at size 12-14, 150-175lbs., 38D/40DD-28/30-36/38. She doesn't have the biggest tits I've ever had. She doesn't have the absolute roundest ass I've ever had. But she's just perfect all around, and only she satisfies all my cravings. The only women that has come close to enticing me in the same regard is Devyn Devine, who only reminds me of the most of what I love about my wife -- a woman I've been fucking for 15 years now -- since late teens to mid-30s.
Doesn't mean I don't find thin, hourglass women attractive. Women like Erica Rose Campbell (especially with her fuller thighs and rear, and broad, universal appeal), Sandee Westgate and, even more so, Shay Laren. Even Shay Laren really makes me wonder if I'd choose her over many FFWs. But I don't look at it like that. I look at it in the simple truth that I love curves, the more extreme, the more wider, the more happy I am. Women like Jelena Jensen seem to feed the appetite a bit better when I go thin, because she's got some nice width to her, while not being "too wide" for most. In any case, I like what I like, and it knows no weight.
Some people say I don't have "standards." Bullshit. I'm picky as fuck. Always have been. In fact, when I dated, some women complained about me dating fatter women than them, or even in a few cases, women who "weighed just as much" as them. I like what I like, and while I can technically describe it to a point, in all matters, I never limit what my eyes and manhood says is "sexy," and definitely never go after a woman just because she's "allegedly sexy."
Responses to others follow in Part 2/2 ...
To start, before I respond to others, I (sarcasm) utterly love the absolute lack of differentiation. "Fat chicks" has been used to classify some of the most beautiful women on the planet. I regularly catch men having "unexplained attraction" to the "odd fat chick" that seems "different" than the "other fat chicks." Now why is that?
I wrote most of the technical meat in the Wikipedia article Female Body Shape. Technically put, you can talk about the different shapes -- straight/rectangular/banana, spoon/pear/bell, those two being a good 80% of Anglo-American women, and then apple and the most rare hourglass shapes. Erotically, I want my hands horizontal and closer together when I feel her midsection, but I want my hands virtual when I'm "pulling her hips down" or "cupping her breasts up."
I learned long ago that visual reality was my ultimate fantasy. I started with busty women when I was a kid. But then started going after "thin blondes with tight asses" out of indirect peer pressure and social standing, of which I was frigid and even excused as "being respectable." After getting dumped for being frigid (my girlfriend cheated on me well before that, then just made it official), I got a Playboy, discovered Petra Verkaik, and thought it was her breasts.
But soon after dating the nicest, sweetest and fullest friend I had, I discovered it was ...
- Her extreme width
- Her extreme hourglass
I noticed it the first time she put on a teddy -- she has more width and hourglass form than the very attractive model in the catalogue. It was then I realized I wanted those wide, fanging hips surrounded by a narrow midsection but then going up to a good, wide chest and shoulders.
The fact that she was slender and mega-sized, F-cup busty were just "bonuses." Especially being that mammary intercourse -- tit-fucking -- was my newfound "safe sex," and because I liked wide, hourglass women, or at least stock, wide, apple women, they had breasts that were wide, so far more full. I finally realized what totally made me go from frigid to ultra pervert overnight! And I never stopped. I've been a fucking horny bastard since and, with only one exception early on, I never cared what the fuck other people thought -- it's my happiness at stake!
I really don't care for 99% of BBWs myself, and probably a good 75% of FFWs, even some of the more slender. Why? Because they are often pear/spoon shaped or straight, with weight going disportionately to their stomches or ass and not up as well or distributed wide. At the same time, some women are just so well designed, so wide and hourglass, that they can take on a shitload of weight and it won't go to their stomach for quite awhile. This includes women like Laura Orsolya and Autumn-Jade (love her 100x more full than thin) and Kerry Marie (until recently, she's finally hit a point where it is going to her stomach).
At the same time, there are very rare BBWs with very extreme hourglasses that still look hot and curvy enough, even with "too much weight." Extremely rare women like Samantha Anderson and Maria Moore -- the latter being one of my all-time favorites, even though I typically prefer more slender FFW. Hourglass and stocky apples that are wide just "take the weight better."
I met my stocky-apple, 5'3" wife at a size 6, 125lbs., 36-24-34. She's been as heavy as a size 20, over 200lbs., 42F-30-40. She's probably most ideal at size 12-14, 150-175lbs., 38D/40DD-28/30-36/38. She doesn't have the biggest tits I've ever had. She doesn't have the absolute roundest ass I've ever had. But she's just perfect all around, and only she satisfies all my cravings. The only women that has come close to enticing me in the same regard is Devyn Devine, who only reminds me of the most of what I love about my wife -- a woman I've been fucking for 15 years now -- since late teens to mid-30s.
Doesn't mean I don't find thin, hourglass women attractive. Women like Erica Rose Campbell (especially with her fuller thighs and rear, and broad, universal appeal), Sandee Westgate and, even more so, Shay Laren. Even Shay Laren really makes me wonder if I'd choose her over many FFWs. But I don't look at it like that. I look at it in the simple truth that I love curves, the more extreme, the more wider, the more happy I am. Women like Jelena Jensen seem to feed the appetite a bit better when I go thin, because she's got some nice width to her, while not being "too wide" for most. In any case, I like what I like, and it knows no weight.
Some people say I don't have "standards." Bullshit. I'm picky as fuck. Always have been. In fact, when I dated, some women complained about me dating fatter women than them, or even in a few cases, women who "weighed just as much" as them. I like what I like, and while I can technically describe it to a point, in all matters, I never limit what my eyes and manhood says is "sexy," and definitely never go after a woman just because she's "allegedly sexy."
Responses to others follow in Part 2/2 ...
FAT CHICS is really a bad choice of words .
