do you believe 911 was an inside job

[TheOrangeCat]

It's one word here in America, It's obviously not in the land of Rotten Teeth! :hatsoff:

Actually it's two words, except on Wikipedia, which says it all.

Lookit ...

A machine that chips wood is a wood chipper.

Willy the Wood Chipper is permissible because not only does Willy chip wood, but as a result of his wood chipping, it has become his name or title.

Willy Woodchipper is also acceptable, as the function of chipping wood has been co-opted into a name (proper noun)

I can do this all night. But would rather not, when there are :tinhat: to debate.

 

[lurkingdirk]

I believe that while some believe there is believing that this was in inside job, I'm unable to believe the believers are actually believers and not fucking twatsicles.

:2 cents:

 

[TheOrangeCat]

I believe that while some believe there is believing that this was in inside job, I'm unable to believe the believers are actually believers and not fucking twatsicles.

:2 cents:

Some will have a hard time believing in your belief that the belief of some inside job believers is not actual belief ...

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

ok.

you're all retarded.

better TOC?

You should have capitalized the Y and began the question with "Is that better...." But yes, it has degenerated into a retarded shit throwing contest.

 

[TheOrangeCat]

But yes, it has degenerated into a retarded shit throwing contest.

Exactly .. let's get back to debating the pathetic, repeated and shameless lies of the 'truthers'

 

[lurkingdirk]

Now, we should all be sensitive, lest the truthers cry.



In any case, thanks for bumping this thread again, WTC. Your single-mindedness on this board is remarkable. The most amazing thing is that you aren't looking for discussion, yet you continue to throw spurious information out.

 

[WTC7WasPulled]

The polls actually show most people know that the Government lied completely about 9/11. The same handful of regular trolls always call anyone who questions it crazy. Why is it always the same people? And why do they always attack the messenger and not the message?

Obviously with the 9/11 victims families and 1500 Architects and Engineers, this is not even close to a crazy notion. The evidence is off the charts of an inside job.

http://www.RememberBuilding7.org

 

[TheOrangeCat]

The polls actually show most people know that the Government lied completely about 9/11.

Again, please provide a link or some tangible proof of this claim.

Also, of your previous NIST claim.

Thanks.

 

[WTC7WasPulled]

Again, please provide a link or some tangible proof of this claim.

Also, of your previous NIST claim.

Thanks.

Ok here is NIST admitting free fall collapse of Building 7 which is equivilent to saying it was a demolition.

Part 1


Part 2


Part 3

 

[TheOrangeCat]

Ok here is NIST admitting free fall collapse of Building 7 which is equivilent to saying it was a demolition.

Part 1


Part 2


Part 3

1. This is from 2008 and a draft report and has been superseded by at least 2 other reports
2. No they don't
3. No it isn't

What they actually say (in both 2008 and 2010 update) is:

''In the draft WTC 7 report (released Aug. 21, 2008; available at http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1A_for_public_comment.pdf), NIST stated that the north face of the building descended 18 stories (the portion of the collapse visible in the video) in 5.4 seconds, based on video analysis of the building collapse. This time period is 40 percent longer than the 3.9 seconds this process would have taken if the north face of the building had descended solely under free fall conditions.''

Keep the lies coming though. They make me laugh.

 

[lurkingdirk]

The polls actually show most people know that the Government lied completely about 9/11. The same handful of regular trolls always call anyone who questions it crazy. Why is it always the same people? And why do they always attack the messenger and not the message?

Obviously with the 9/11 victims families and 1500 Architects and Engineers, this is not even close to a crazy notion. The evidence is off the charts of an inside job.

http://www.RememberBuilding7.org

Ok here is NIST admitting free fall collapse of Building 7 which is equivilent to saying it was a demolition.

Part 1


Part 2


Part 3

The polls don't show what you claim above, and I'm not watching long and boring youtube videos. Remember? I watched your videos previously (though you didn't believe I did). They're not compelling, they're not convincing, and I find them to be an enormous waste of time.

I'm really happy for you that you've got a mission in life. I'm so pleased that you are so convicted in your arguments. If you're just going to dismiss every single counterpoint, you're not going to get good discussion.

If you dismiss every single argument/counterpoint with a long, pointless youtube video, people on here are going to make fun of you. They're going to derail your threads. You're going to get negative rep. And when you report all these things every single time to the mods, the mods will start to resent you and the amount of time you force them to spend reviewing things that are non-issues.

You have stated your opinions so many times here, there is likely not a single member on this board who doesn't know what you're all about. What is your point in continuing to hammer on this theme? Are you proselytizing? Do you think you're changing the country? Are you lining yourself up for a presidential bid in the next election? Do you think you're going to get Roald in bed?

For me, the more you insist on posting this material after it has been made abundantly clear that there is very little appetite for it simple proves that you are either unbalanced, unintelligent, or just plain stirring shit up for the sake of being a shit disturber.

Take from this what you will. Or ignore it. Whatever.

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

A controlled demolition or a terrorist attack would bring the buildings down at the same rate. The freefall idea has been debunked time and time again. You're still stupid.

http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm

And more on WTC7.

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

Oh, and here's the NIST's official website and report.

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

 

[BlueBalls]

The polls actually show most people know that the Government lied completely about 9/11.

Oh, so because most people believe it to be true, it has to be true? This, my dear Sir, is what one might call an appeal to majority (or an argumentum ad populum). I'm sure you're very much aware (being the complete mental giant that you are) that using such a proposition in an argument is fallacious.

Nice try though.

Now onto the whining about "attacking the messenger and not the message". As I seem to remember it, you were addressed by several members here a few months ago all attempting to refute or discuss opposing view points on this matter with you and on every occasion you chose to ignore their evidence or arguments in favour of posting the same asinine Youtube links over and over again, making absolutely no attempt whatsoever to refute their claims. If you aren't willing to take part in rational discourse where you demonstrate your willingness to defend your position against another who holds an opposing view, without resorting to intellectual laziness, it's little wonder why you're seen as such a pathetic joke around here.

 

[lurkingdirk]

Oh, so because most people believe it to be true, it has to be true? This, my dear Sir, is what one might call an appeal to majority (or an argumentum ad populum). I'm sure you're very much aware (being the complete mental giant that you are) that using such a proposition in an argument is fallacious.

Nice try though.

Now onto the whining about "attacking the messenger and not the message". As I seem to remember it, you were addressed by several members here a few months ago all attempting to refute or discuss opposing view points on this matter with you and on every occasion you chose to ignore their evidence or arguments in favour of posting the same asinine Youtube links over and over again, making absolutely no attempt whatsoever to refute their claims. If you aren't willing to take part in rational discourse where you demonstrate your willingness to defend your position against another who holds an opposing view, without resorting to intellectual laziness, it's little wonder why you're seen as such a pathetic joke around here.

Stop using big words. They frighten many people following this thread.

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

And since this seems to be the only medium you pay attention to:




And just in case you still trust the Biggest Douche in the Universe (Dylan Avery) there's this:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=36c_1252510212

 

[Trident1]

How is it that this thread, this subject still exists.

 

[lurkingdirk]

How is it that this thread, this subject still exists.

A fine question.

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

I think most of us find WTF's willful ignorance to be entertaining.

 

[TheOrangeCat]

I think most of us find WTF's willful ignorance to be entertaining.

let's be fair: without people who make us go 'what the fuck is he talking about?' or, 'what a bunch of insulting, malicious lies', we'd have fewer mirrors held up to our view of life, and thus, fewer opportunities to examine our own beliefs. And, let's face it, nothing helps sense make sense more, than a raging tide of insanity.

 

[lurkingdirk]

I think most of us find WTF's willful ignorance to be entertaining.

I masturbate to his ignorance.

And he still doesn't answer the questions I pose.