do you believe 911 was an inside job
- Thread starter wesman2601
- Start date
Yes. I have looked at everything you have posted, and I find it entirely lacking. It is not true. Didn't convince me whatsoever. I find it laughable, actually. If you're believing that, I think you'll believe anything that a conspiracy theorist puts forth.
Like, let's say, mind control of a would-be political assassin.
Nope. You haven't convinced me. Now what? I have seen your evidence, and I'm actually a pretty smart guy, and I think you're entirely wrong. Please, tell me now, should I continue to read your posts, or should I just ignore you, and allow you to continue post what I believe is complete bullshit?
Lurkingdurk you ain't looked at shit, stop lying. I know this. You are here to just shit all over 9/11 truth just like the rest of your gang.
Watch this documentary. If you have any questions that controlled demolition brought down the towers, this documentary will show you that in fact controlled demolition was indeed what brought down all 3 towers.
Rane1071
For the EMPEROR!!
I think she should stick to porn
That's quite a statement. So anyone that doesn't believe in your "truth" is either wrong or lying ... Way to go, it's good to see your still so open-minded :horse:
kingoftherodeo
Banned
Once I get an explanation from Dominik Suter, Urban Moving Systems, and the Kurzberg boys, I will at least be able to cross another one off the list. Too many unknowns and snakes poisoning the well at this point to get a clear picture. The only thing I am sure of is it didn't unfold the way the government told everybody it unfolded. After that, the picture becomes cloudy...and that's by design.
vodkazvictim
Why save the world, when you can rule it?
Open petition to the Mods:
Please ship WTC boy back to whichever troofer forum he came to us from in very small boxes.
If you agree, quote this.
Please ship WTC boy back to whichever troofer forum he came to us from in very small boxes.
If you agree, quote this.
alexpnz
Lord Dipstick
OKAY! OKAY!! NOW I'm convinced after watching this, that it was indeed, an inside job....
Ace Bandage
The one and only.
She has awesome tits.
Unfortunately, she comes across as being slightly less intelligent than Cheese Whiz. She hasn't read any good books and would consider marrying Tiger Woods. I wouldn't exactly take her thoughts seriously unless they were about something a little more superficial. Global conspiracies seem a little over her head. Just sayin'...
Whenever I see Amia Miley, I unzip my pants and make the executive decision to "Pull It", which sets off explosions throughout my body, causes my knees to buckle and makes me collapse to the ground at free fall speed, just like the WTC 7 building. So based on my experiments, I'll subscribe to this theory.
Someone shove something in her mouth to shut her up.
When are porn stars going to realise their mouths are good for only one thing...:dunno:
um......you may want to watch what you say.
unless your kidding. in which case i dont give a fuck
Take your own advice you insolent swine!
I keep telling myself to NOT enter this thread, and not get into these completely stupid arguments, but here I am.
1. A remotely controlled airplane is easier to control than from the cockpit? Right.
2. If they were remotely controlled, why were there hijackers on the plane?
3. If they were remotely controlled, what happened with the plane that civilians brought down?
4. If they were going blow up the towers with explosives anyway, why bother with the planes?
5. Why would they use a missile to hit the Pentagon, when they used planes for the WTC towers? Why switch tactics?
6. If that plane didn't hit the Pentagon, what happened to it, and all of its passengers?
7. How many people must have been involved to...
a. plant explosives?
b. detonate the explosives?
c. hijack the planes?
d. remotely fly the planes?
e. fire an unnoticed missile at the Pentagon?
f. murder a civilian who "knew too much" - while other conspiracy nuts are still yacking their heads off, and are still alive?
8. Of all those people, no one has stepped up to take the blame, except Osama.
9. If all of your theories were true, what proof do you have that it wasn't al Queda who did it all?
10. This retarded discussion will not bring those victims back.
If you cannot answer these questions to our satisfaction, I think this thread is done with.
1. A remotely controlled airplane is easier to control than from the cockpit? Right.
2. If they were remotely controlled, why were there hijackers on the plane?
3. If they were remotely controlled, what happened with the plane that civilians brought down?
4. If they were going blow up the towers with explosives anyway, why bother with the planes?
5. Why would they use a missile to hit the Pentagon, when they used planes for the WTC towers? Why switch tactics?
6. If that plane didn't hit the Pentagon, what happened to it, and all of its passengers?
7. How many people must have been involved to...
a. plant explosives?
b. detonate the explosives?
c. hijack the planes?
d. remotely fly the planes?
e. fire an unnoticed missile at the Pentagon?
f. murder a civilian who "knew too much" - while other conspiracy nuts are still yacking their heads off, and are still alive?
8. Of all those people, no one has stepped up to take the blame, except Osama.
9. If all of your theories were true, what proof do you have that it wasn't al Queda who did it all?
10. This retarded discussion will not bring those victims back.
If you cannot answer these questions to our satisfaction, I think this thread is done with.
A relatively small team of 20 or so military demolition men could've easily applied the new technology explosives. Everyone involved was on a need to know basis or compartmentalized is the right word.
We don't have accurate info about the Pentagon attack because they won't release any clear videos they have of the plane coming in.
Bin Laden initially denied any involvement with 9/11. It was only that shady video tape they supposedly found in a house in Afghanistan that Bin Laden admits any 9/11 connection. Experts say the tape is a fake.
Talking about this will help the victims receive justice from those who murdered them and the subsequent millions that have been killed as a result and everyones loss of civil liberties.
vodkazvictim
Why save the world, when you can rule it?
That one I can explain with the theory of plausible deniability; you allow some people who nobody would believe to talk about a secret, or you publish a sci fi series featuring the secret and then when a serious source (eg a newspaper) starts poking around the secret you promptly point to the sci fi series/conspiracy nut who nobody will ever believe BECAUSE HE SUPPORTS SO MANY CONSPIRACIES THAT THE IMMEDIATE LOGICAL CONCLUSION IS THAT HE JUST LIKES CONSPIRACIES and who thinks we are mostly one "gatekeeper" under many names denying the truth et voila; your secret is plausibly deniable because anyone who talks about it has just been watching too much sci fi/ listening to :tinhat:
As for the other points, I've no explanation of them :dunno: sorry about that :dunno:
Ace Boobtoucher
Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
God damn it.:tinhat::tinhat::tinhat:
respect
