Dicks are such a turn-on!

[dewey]

I'm scared of change can't we just leave things alone and go back to "don't ask don"t tell? I need to go look at boobs now. YEA!

 

[member20672]

I'm not going to type an intellectual paragraph on differences and feelings like some of my fellow members, but IMO if this is what your into, you will not receive any harsh comments, neg. attitude or any feelings of dislike from me. To each their own, and I feel that what you enjoy, as long as its pleasurable/enjoyable to you and doesn't hurt anyone else, then don't feel the pressure of others to change.:thumbsup:

 

[Trigger1286]

This is what happens when you get addicted to pornography ladies and gentlemen.

 

[McRocket]

I'm not going to type an intellectual paragraph on differences and feelings like some of my fellow members, but IMO if this is what your into, you will not receive any harsh comments, neg. attitude or any feelings of dislike from me. To each their own, and I feel that what you enjoy, as long as its pleasurable/enjoyable to you and doesn't hurt anyone else, then don't feel the pressure of others to change.:thumbsup:

Great post. I agree 100%.

I admire this person whom started this thread very much for typing what he typed. But Nightfly is right, you will get a lot of flack on boards like this for that. ANd you should be prepared for that.

When I was dating a very attractive (to me anyways), very open sexually, woman a while back. She asked if I would consider letting a guy go down on me - she got turned on by two guys. I jokingly said I will only if she would do it with another woman. And she readily agreed. So then I had to rethink whether I actually would or not. I decided I probably would not.

Since then I have been a crack addict and seen ALL kinds of things. I never participated or was aroused by what I saw. But I saw. And now I could probably answer yes - but only if it was turning on my woman big time. And only if she had already been with a woman for my viewing pleasure. And my woman and I were VERY tight. But I think I could. I wouldn't want to make a habit of it. In fact I think that once per lifetime would be enough. But I would do it under those circumstances.

Now going down on a guy? Maybe. But this would have to be for ONE HECK OF A WOMAN. I am not sure.

But even after having typed all that. I really don't wish to go down on another man because of curiosity. So I would suggest to the person whom started this thread that he is either one of two things:
a) Has had ALOT of sex and is starting to get bored (many rock stars that have done everything with every type of woman imaginable apparently have gotten bored and tried bisexual for the heck of it in the past).
or b) is maybe a tad more bisexual then he wished to admit or wants to believe.

Nothing wrong with either. And bisexual does not mean gay. And bisexual could be just a phase. And even if it is not a phase I think that there is NOTHING AT ALL wrong with it. But I just think it may be something to consider.

 

[SeraphiM]

I for one can honestly say I've never watched a porno and said "Hey that's a nice cock" or got turned on by some guy’s penis.

My brain is not wired to look at male body that way.

For example after watching a porno scene I couldn't tell you what color the girls fingernails were? Whether or not there were satin or silk sheets on the bed? or what color were the window drapes were? But I can tell you about what cup size the girl was, whether or not she was a blonde, redhead, or a brunette, whether or not she had a shaved, triangle, high and tight, or bushy pussy. I tend to focus on the hot piece of female flesh on the screen, the things that interest and turn me on.

To each his own vice :thumbsup:

 

[member2686]

I don't see pleasurable, non-abusive, non-utilitarian, consenting human sexuality/sex of any orientation as a "vice" at all. Great post, Colonel, and perhaps I am over-analyzing your words, but I guess the term "vice" pushed my "sensitivity button." I have a degree in English Literature, so I tend to scrutinize writings too closely. lol I think I know what you're saying, though. :hatsoff: :thumbsup:

...To each his own vice...

 

[SeraphiM]

I don't see pleasurable, non-abusive, non-utilitarian, consenting human sexuality/sex of any orientation as a "vice" at all. Great post, Colonel, and perhaps I am over-analyzing your words, but I guess the term "vice" pushed my "sensitivity button." I have a degree in English Literature, so I tend to scrutinize writings too closely. lol I think I know what you're saying, though. :hatsoff: :thumbsup:

Nah, you were over analyzing.
It's just a saying I've picked up in my line of work.
Call my choice of words as coming from a working the streets degree.
Nothing inflammatory intended by it at all.
I respect the authors and repliers comments regarding the topic 100%.
Even though they are not my own, I refuse to add any morality issues to it.
Who am I to judge anyone :thumbsup:

 

[McRocket]

Who am I to judge anyone :thumbsup:

A human being. Whose opinion is worth absolutely no more and no less then any other human beings' on Earth.

 

[SeraphiM]

A human being. Whose opinion is worth absolutely no more and no less then any other human beings' on Earth.

Amen.

 

[Max]

This topic makes me feel uneasy! :eek:

I HATE! it when the camera even glances over the men in a porn movie!

For me porn is the chance to watch beautiful women, which you would never meet walking out of a pharmacy in your local hood, getting extreme lengths of pleasure!

Now each to thier own, and as the other members have been kind to you and gave you informational responses, there is not much more anyone can really say...

Apart from that these topics arn't the best suited on these boards imo!. Now I know that it takes "balls" (no pun intended) to post this kinda stuff on international porn boards, but it's not the topics I like to see and would have liked to see it drop off front page with no responses!

But if it's the way you feel, then that's your life..

But likeing cocks in porn makes me feel ukey:

 

[jdb67]

I go away for 5 days and everyone starts talking about dicks!!!.....:eek:

The only dick I like is my own!!!:1orglaugh

 

[calpoon]

I find it ironic that several people that say this shouldn't be a topic of discussion have taken the time to say how they feel about it.

I understand that this board sways towards a certain persuation, but this is the "free" talk section and I don't think any post should be discouraged as long as it's goal is toward legitamate discussion of ideas. I personally prefer the more intellectual discussions and it's the ability of members here to bring many different well thought out views to the table that keeps me coming here. that being said, I don't have any problem whatsoever with the multitudes of "this chick is the hottest" threads, if that's what you want, more power to you.

 

[Oops!WrongHole]

no they are not
i have a dick, i see it everyday, no big deal. the things i don't have are way more atractive.

 

[om3ga]

I go away for 5 days and everyone starts talking about dicks!!!.....:eek:

The only dick I like is my own!!!:1orglaugh

What he said.......:1orglaugh

Seriously though - if you want to talk about penises, fine - that's your perogative, I'll just move on to another thread.

And as long as said debate is conducted politely & intelligently, there shouldn't be a problem with anyone else.......

Ok - I'm outta here....:wave:

 

[julian999]

I apologize for bumping this thread but my internet connection broke down just when I was going to submit a lengthy response to calpoon's post about the reasons for the heavy emphasis on male genitalia in porn, which I found very interesting. I can't be arsed to write all that again two weeks and a new internet connection later, but I'd still like to give you the brief version of the points I made: I am positive that the heavy focus on dicks in porn is not solely a matter of demonstrating male potency and power, even though that may be the most important factor. I still maintain that there is an undercurrent of homoeroticism at work in straight porn. One reason for suspecting this is the fact that cumshot scenes originally only could be seen in gay porn and today is the pivotal moment of every straight porn scene. I know there are a lot of different theories trying to explain this that don't include any mention of homoeroticism but I stand by that conviction. Another example is the "big dicks" sections on porn sites that feature galleries of straight sex with well-hung men. It's clearly aimed at a supposedly straight audience but why would a straight guy care about the size of the male organ? Well, because he takes an interest in it. It's covert homosexual lust, the woman provides an alibi, reassuring the hetero-male that it's OK to look at naked men just as long as those voluptuous gushes of semen land safely on mammary ground.

Anyway, thanks for all the replies which have been very interesting to read. Many of you have mentioned that I should be prepared to take some serious flak, but I see none of that in the replies (not saying I would care one bit if there would be flaming). In fact I think this forum seems quite civilized and clearly shows some intellectual merit on behalf of its participants.

 

[jod0565]

In fact I think this forum seems quite civilized and clearly shows some intellectual merit on behalf of its participants.

That is the quote of the year and I'm glad to have read it in this thread! Please share, Everyone!

 

[4G63]

I apologize for bumping this thread but my INTERNET connection broke down just when I was going to submit a lengthy response to Clapton's post about the reasons for the heavy emphasis on male genitalia in porn, which I found very interesting. I can't be arced to write all that again two weeks and a new INTERNET connection later, but I'd still like to give you the brief version of the points I made: I am positive that the heavy focus on dicks in porn is not solely a matter of demonstrating male potency and power, even though that may be the most important factor. I still maintain that there is an undercurrent of homo eroticism at work in straight porn. One reason for suspecting this is the fact that cum shot scenes originally only could be seen in gay porn and today is the pivotal moment of every straight porn scene. I know there are a lot of different theories trying to explain this that don't include any mention of homo eroticism but I stand by that conviction. Another example is the "big dicks" sections on porn sites that feature galleries of straight sex with well-hung men. It's clearly aimed at a supposedly straight audience but why would a straight guy care about the size of the male organ? Well, because he takes an interest in it. It's covert homosexual lust, the woman provides an alibi, reassuring the hetero-male that it's OK to look at naked men just as long as those voluptuous gushes of semen land safely on mammary ground.

Anyway, thanks for all the replies which have been very interesting to read. Many of you have mentioned that I should be prepared to take some serious flak, but I see none of that in the replies (not saying I would care one bit if there would be flaming). In fact I think this forum seems quite civilized and clearly shows some intellectual merit on behalf of its participants.

But porn is catered to every one Man, Woman, and everything between. The production company's puts the hottest big-titted babe with a muscular chest, attached to a big dick, and film as much filth as possible. That caters to a much larger crowd. If an individual watches for the big dick that's gay. That and threads like "Dicks are such a turn-on!" both really gay.

 

[wolfblood]

Who would have thought such a ridiculous topic would attract so many responses? I actually did take the time to ready all the threads and I have to give you credit Julian for “coming” out and admitting to the whole world your dark sexual desire, since its such a gay desire as well, but man I have to say since you even got into the position to suck some guys cock even though you didn’t go through with it, you at least had the motivation to get that close to doing it, so I guess, as you defiantly said that you are not gay you must be bi-sexual man because the only time I have ever commented on another guys cock was when some huge black dude on a porn entered the room.

 

[Zoso6980]

I search for Deidre Holland and I get this thread?

Julian my cuckoo for cock friend. What you need to look into is Trannies.

http://www.fedas.net/main.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Vaniity/

My thoughts as they come? Biology loves sexuality and diversity. Society hates it.

I don't think you can truly know what it feels like to be appreciated sexually unless you were with another man. But, being that the idea of having sex with a man is preturbing to me and if I were ever to do so I would have to toss his chopped up body into a dumpster to, y'know, keep it on the DL, a tranny sounds like a logical compromise.

Heres an interesting poll.
http://www.avninsider.com/stories/vickirichter050905.shtml

And Julian I'm not seeing the homoerotic undertones in porn as you do. Cumshots (especially anywhere our girlfriends don't like and we do) are fantasy fullfillment. As are girls being overwhelmed by great big cocks.

Anyways. You suck one dick and suddenly your gay? Jeez.

Z.

P.S. And I'm not sayin' I did. I'm just sayin' thats all. I mean, I'm making a joke! Christ, now I have to go **edit** to shake all this gay off of me.

 

[julian999]

Zoso, my friend. If you ever need self-validation, just meet me in the alley by the railway station.

(And yes, you can bring a trannie.)