I obviously can't turn a blind eye on the second side of the race for the presidencyof the USA 2016.
The depth and the systemic ***** of the "Clinton Foundation" is wrong. And we can more than assume that the top brass of the DNC knew for years, there will be enopugh ****** emails to prove it
So the second candidate rules itself out.
Leaves a possibility that in election years was not as possible, this time I believe guys like Jagger68 got it right:
Vote third or fourth party. Even if the candidate does not win, it sends a strong message, and if you guys keep working for third options besides the two wrecked, corrupt, failed main parties - longterm, there can be a change.
The depth and the systemic ***** of the "Clinton Foundation" is wrong. And we can more than assume that the top brass of the DNC knew for years, there will be enopugh ****** emails to prove it
So the second candidate rules itself out.
Leaves a possibility that in election years was not as possible, this time I believe guys like Jagger68 got it right:
Vote third or fourth party. Even if the candidate does not win, it sends a strong message, and if you guys keep working for third options besides the two wrecked, corrupt, failed main parties - longterm, there can be a change.