Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

[lurkingdirk]

I'm still waiting for your 100% rock solid evidence that $22,000 per day rental plane wasn't made up by you.

Didn't you see? He said he already addressed this.

I know he didn't, but he can't admit that he's wrong, and he'd have to do so to address your point.

 

[eric2136]

Re: Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

Your sites are no more credible than the ones that we provided.

Ok I know you are a little slow on the uptake, so I'll explain it yet again. It has nothing to do with the sites. It has to do with the credibility of the actual person(s) making the statements. I have referenced Aviation Scientists, NASA Heliophysicists, Public Health Officials, Political Leaders, Environmental Scientists, .etc. from around the world providing direct testimony substantiating the chemtrail/geoengineering phenomenon.

You have nothing to offer compared to that. I know you are somewhat simple, but even you should understand that I clearly have the overwhelming weight of the best evidence . Additionallly, the fact that you obviously are doing whatever you can to avoid responding directly to this fact tells me that, although you are an idiot for even thinking of questioning the existence of a phenomenon that scientists have been studying for over 40 years, you are also a liar.

I give no credence whatsoever to what liars say in general. A liars words are only persuasive to other liars, but not to me. So as such, anything you say, or provide, will have the presumption of insufficiency, unless you can definitively prove otherwise to my satisfaction. Which is highly unlikely.

 

[BlkHawk]

Re: Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

Ok I know you are a little slow on the uptake, so I'll explain it yet again. It has nothing to do with the sites. It has to do with the credibility of the actual person(s) making the statements.

But,

Ad Hominem Argument of irrelevancy - general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim.

So, dismissing one of your 100% rock solid sources because he believes a race of underground lizard people is plotting to take over the world, is wrong, but your dismissal of peer reviewed scientists because they present real information that blows your theory to hell is ok?

Ok got it, two sets of rules. Rules in writing for us, whatever rule is convenient for you.

Thank you for clearing that up.

 

[eric2136]

Re: Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

You can revisit posts #242, #255, #260, #262, #267, and #272 to realize that I have provided the absolute best evidence, by far, substantiating the thesis of this thread, and, as such, each and every statement made by me, in anyway relating to this topic, is 100% accurate, and my evidence is 100% rock solid and, as such, constitutes the absolute truth and reality of the situation.

The fact that you obviously are doing whatever you can to avoid responding directly to this fact tells me that, although you are an idiot for even thinking of questioning the existence of a phenomenon that scientists have been studying for over 40 years, you are also a liar.

I give no credence whatsoever to what liars say in general. A liars words are only persuasive to other liars, but not to me. So as such, anything you say, or provide, will have the presumption of insufficiency, unless you can definitively prove otherwise to my satisfaction. Which is highly unlikely.

Try again…"

But,

So, dismissing one of your 100% rock solid sources because he believes a race of underground lizard people is plotting to take over the world, is wrong, but your dismissal of peer reviewed scientists because they present real information that blows your theory to hell is ok?

Ok got it, two sets of rules. Rules in writing for us, whatever rule is convenient for you.

Thank you for clearing that up.

 

[bobjustbob]

Re: Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

The fact that I obviously do whatever I can to avoid responding directly to Bob's question tells you that, although I am an idiot, I am also a liar.

Fixed.

 

[eric2136]

Re: Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

I am bob the idiot clown, reduced to tampering with quotes because I have been so soundly crushed and humiliated that all I can do is continue to repeat the same irrelevant question over and over again like a stammering punch drunk buffoon

LOL ! I give no credence whatsoever to what you say. Anything you say has the presumption of insufficiency.

Try again…"

 

[bobjustbob]

Re: Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

LOL ! I give no credence whatsoever to what you say. Anything you say has the presumption of insufficiency.

Try again…"

Okay, I'll try again. Where can these planes, that you posted about, be rented for $22,000 a day?

 

[Red XXX]

Re: Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

Okay, I'll try again. Where can these planes, that you posted about, be rented for $22,000 a day?

bobjustbob ... I can get you a plane it's only $1,995 and it has a ceiling of 41000ft, not many planes can go that high according eric2136 :catpopcorn:

 

[bobjustbob]

Re: Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

bobjustbob ... I can get you a plane it's only $1,995 and it has a ceiling of 41000ft, not many planes can go that high according eric2136 :catpopcorn:

LOL ! I give no credence whatsoever to what you say. Anything you say has the presumption of insufficiency. That highly advanced airline technology is for military use only.

Try again…"

 

[lurkingdirk]

So, if research is peer reviewed, and many people look at it and agree, it doesn't count as much as if one person says something is true? According to you, one person who happens to have a particular job saying something quite outlandish is true convinces you more than many people looking at data and coming to a consensus does?

Yes. That is how it works for conspiracy theorists.

You're not terribly smart, are you?

 

[eric2136]

Re: Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

Okay, I'll try again. Where can these planes, that you posted about, be rented for $22,000 a day?

Your question is old, stale, and irrelevant, but you are an amusing sideshow to this thread. Unfortunately Sideshow Bob is already taken so I, instead, dub thee…

:clap: Tatto Boy Bob :clap: !

Please feel free to now carry on repeating your idiotic pointless question…I look forward to seeing how this works out for you :1orglaugh !

 

[bobjustbob]

What do call people that make a specific claim yet provide no evidence to support it?

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

Your entertaining picture of Huge Chaves notwithstanding, you still haven't answered a single question, Will.

 

[eric2136]

Re: Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

bobjustbob ... I can get you a plane it's only $1,995 and it has a ceiling of 41000ft, not many planes can go that high according eric2136 :catpopcorn:

Poor little Red Bean….you are so pretty and helpful, yet you haven't figured out that he has no interest in your answer, he is just being a jerk because he has been mightily defeated by me regarding the central issue of this thread and he has nothing else left to say…so now he has become a …..:troll2:

He will continue repeating that silly question on and on no matter what anyone says,,,best you leave him to his lunacy and come to me …I have plenty of things you can help me with :yesyes: :yummie: :yesyes: !

 

[eric2136]

So, if research is peer reviewed, and many people look at it and agree, it doesn't count as much as if one person says something is true? According to you, one person who happens to have a particular job saying something quite outlandish is true convinces you more than many people looking at data and coming to a consensus does?

Yes. That is how it works for conspiracy theorists.

You're not terribly smart, are you?

Ok I know you are a little slow on the uptake, so I'll explain it yet again. I have presented the overwhelming amount of corroborating testimonies, from persons with superior professional and political proximity to the geoengineering phenomenon to make statements of paramount credible significance. I have referenced Aviation Scientists, NASA Heliophysicists, Public Health Officials, Political Leaders, Environmental Scientists, .etc. from around the world providing direct testimony substantiating the chemtrail/geoengineering phenomenon.

You have nothing to offer compared to that. I know you are somewhat simple, but even you should understand that I clearly have the overwhelming weight of the best evidence . Additionallly, the fact that you obviously are doing whatever you can to avoid responding directly to this fact tells me that, although you are an idiot for even thinking of questioning the existence of a phenomenon that scientists have been studying for over 40 years, you are also a liar.

I give no credence whatsoever to what liars say in general. A liars words are only persuasive to other liars, but not to me. So as such, anything you say, or provide, will have the presumption of insufficiency, unless you can definitively prove otherwise to my satisfaction. Which is highly unlikely.

 

[lurkingdirk]

Re: Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

Okay, I know you're slow on the uptake, but I'll put out what I said again, because you're wrong.

You have lone vigilantes providing "evidence." We're citing groups of people evaluating data and coming to a consensus. It's pretty simple, scooter. You should reevaluate your life decisions at this point.

Also, you said there were planes for hire to do what you said was happening. Someone has been questioning you on what you said. (Please notice the bold. I'm trying to post in a style to which you are accustomed, so You Might have some reasonable chance of actually answering a question.)

Please show us where these planes for hire are. It's a simple question. However, when you are pressed on it, you say:

Your question is old, stale, and irrelevant

But that's just stupid. Let's recap:
You talk about planes for hire.
You are asked about the planes.
You say the question is old and stale and irrelevant.

Yeah. You failed. How about you answer that one question, and then we can deal with the rest?

 

[eric2136]

Re: Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

Your plane question is irrelevant and will not be addressed by me. You may research this thread regarding this issue and re-visit my previous comments regarding it. If I deem your question to be sufficient, and based on a complete understanding of the idiotic premise suggested by Tattoo Boy Bob, then I may consider commenting on it further.

As for the central issue of chemtrails/geoengineering, I have presented the overwhelming amount of corroborating testimonies, from persons with superior professional and political proximity to the geoengineering phenomenon to make statements of paramount credible significance. I have referenced Aviation Scientists, NASA Heliophysicists, Public Health Officials, Political Leaders, Environmental Scientists, .etc. from around the world providing direct testimony substantiating the chemtrail/geoengineering phenomenon.

You have nothing to offer compared to that. If you suggest otherwise than present the complete credentials of all your references, along with their scientific findings, and links to their biographies….

And don't provide any ridiculous links to the front page of some pathetic "debunk" site…..lying little simpleton LOLOLOL

Okay, I know you're slow on the uptake, but I'll put out what I said again, because you're wrong.

You have lone vigilantes providing "evidence." We're citing groups of people evaluating data and coming to a consensus. It's pretty simple, scooter. You should reevaluate your life decisions at this point.

Also, you said there were planes for hire to do what you said was happening. Someone has been questioning you on what you said. (Please notice the bold. I'm trying to post in a style to which you are accustomed, so You Might have some reasonable chance of actually answering a question.)

Please show us where these planes for hire are. It's a simple question. However, when you are pressed on it, you say:



But that's just stupid. Let's recap:
You talk about planes for hire.
You are asked about the planes.
You say the question is old and stale and irrelevant.

Yeah. You failed. How about you answer that one question, and then we can deal with the rest?

 

[bobjustbob]

So you may question our findings but we may not question your findings?

 

[eric2136]

So you may question our findings but we may not question your findings?

:1orglaugh

 

[JaanaRuutu]

Maybe his article about renting planes is also in another language that he doesn't speak, and is afraid a native will show up and tell him his Google-translated facts aren't actually true.