Chemtrails : Aluminum & Other Poisons Falling From The Sky

[bobjustbob]

I forgot about the funding for research. The great outcry from the scientific community getting their federally funded research being cut off. It's the same game played by planetary engineers and those studying the mating habits of snails in the Rocky Mountain areas of Idaho. Be a Professor, write a paper with a theory, expect to get money handed to you. If you get the grant then you have a job for a few years. If not it's a cover up. It's a money scam from global warming research right down to reptilians.

 

[eric2136]

I forgot about the funding for research. The great outcry from the scientific community getting their federally funded research being cut off. It's the same game played by planetary engineers and those studying the mating habits of snails in the Rocky Mountain areas of Idaho. Be a Professor, write a paper with a theory, expect to get money handed to you. If you get the grant then you have a job for a few years. If not it's a cover up. It's a money scam from global warming research right down to reptilians.

You seem to be trying to respond somewhat intelligently to this topic without actually researching or knowing anything about it, which is impossible;

Sometimes I like to sit with my uncle who is a retired chemist and attorney from the oil industry, and my other uncle who is a retired FDA chemist and military physician,

I like science but it is not my background dicipline, however, our conversations on the topic of Geo-Engineering tend to have a bit more substance than the one I'm having with you right now,

If there is something I need to know about, then I don't care who brings me the message, to argue otherwise is a logical fallacy.

Poisinous chemicals are being dumped on me from planes, then I want to know everything about it, from whomever knows about it.

There are hours of detailed scientific information, and documentation, provided in this thread. Apon fully analyzing the materials, the most pertinent questions, in no way, revolve around the particulars of the speakers' or authors' identity.

The truth of most central key statements can be independently verified by your own research (not just Google). The information is readily available because the complex, and advanced, substance of the subject matter is all that is necessary to conceal the nefarious aspects from detection and comprehension by most people.

 

[bobjustbob]

Here are some of the sources from your videos:

Colin Andrews- Also researches crop circles, Mayan Prophecy, and space aliens.

The Carnicom Institute that researches Morgellons.

Jeff Rense- Radio host that discusses all of the related from conspiracy theories to UFOs to the paranormal.

Karen Whitledge- Transhumanism and nano devices implanted into us.

Sofia Smallstorm- Sandy Hook shootings were a government drill. Also Nanobots.


That's just a handful of the sources that are also involved with their own take on the chemtrail conspiracy theory. You can question my intelligence all you want. I'll question your gullibility to believe in frauds.

 

[xfire]

Everyone needs to rate this thread as terrible, because I know only this idiot eric rated it excellent. Here's a link you need to get acquainted with, eric, http://www.csicop.org/ if you really want people to start flooding your dumb threads with the same volume of rebuttals, that can be done, but really no one gives a **** about your tiny fucked up brain and the psycho circus raging on in there. Go post your **** somewhere else.

 

[Chopper3000]

lol Now the "giblets" moron is also a chemical engineer...now THAT is the biggest load of crap I ever heard...chemtrails is just a laymans term for the field of Geo-Engineering...Which has been pointed out several times already in this thread...There is nothing speculative about this field which has existed for decades. The fact that chemicals are being sprayed over every industrialized nation in the western world is not in dispute and has been admitted by the military and the government. The debate by scientists, attorney's and independent experts centers around exactly what chemicals they are spraying, why are they spraying it, and what the effects are on human health and the enviroment.

For you to come in here and pretend to that Geo-Engineering doesn't exist is beyond ridiculous.

The only chemtrails you should be concerned about are the brown ones down the back of your pants.

 

[Will E Worm]

What in the World Are They Spraying? Link

 

[bobjustbob]

One of those videos posted is an ad to sell us Miracle Mineral Supplement. It's the bleach used in water purification and ****ing bedbugs. It's toxic. The FDA warns against the use of the product. MMS has been marketed as a treatment for a variety of conditions, including HIV, cancer, bad breath, and acne. The FDA warnings informed consumers that MMS can cause serious harm to health, and stated that it has received numerous reports of nausea, severe ********, and life-threatening low ***** pressure caused by dehydration, among other symptoms, such as diarrhea. Chemtrails as the backdrop of a medicine show.

 

[Will E Worm]

The FDA warns .

When has the FDA done anything to stop a harmful product from reaching the people?

How many 1-800-bad- **** commercials are there now?

The FDA doesn't work for us. They do what they are told.

 

[Master Roshi]

When has the FDA done anything to stop a harmful product from reaching the people?

How many 1-800-bad- **** commercials are there now?

The FDA doesn't work for us. They do what they are told.

yup pretty much, big pharma and the FDA have a revolving lobby door, an executive leaves a position at Pfizer and slides right into a position at the FDA and then he or she can go right back to a pharmaceutical company to continue working

 

[eric2136]

Here are some of the sources from your videos:

Colin Andrews- Also researches crop circles, Mayan Prophecy, and space aliens.

The Carnicom Institute that researches Morgellons.

Jeff Rense- Radio host that discusses all of the related from conspiracy theories to UFOs to the paranormal.

Karen Whitledge- Transhumanism and nano devices implanted into us.

Sofia Smallstorm- Sandy Hook shootings were a government drill. Also Nanobots.


That's just a handful of the sources that are also involved with their own take on the chemtrail conspiracy theory. You can question my intelligence all you want. I'll question your gullibility to believe in frauds.

One of those videos posted is an ad to sell us Miracle Mineral Supplement. It's the bleach used in water purification and ****ing bedbugs. It's toxic. The FDA warns against the use of the product. MMS has been marketed as a treatment for a variety of conditions, including HIV, cancer, bad breath, and acne. The FDA warnings informed consumers that MMS can cause serious harm to health, and stated that it has received numerous reports of nausea, severe ********, and life-threatening low ***** pressure caused by dehydration, among other symptoms, such as diarrhea. Chemtrails as the backdrop of a medicine show.

Ad Hominem Argument of irrelevancy - general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.

 

[eric2136]

yup pretty much, big pharma and the FDA have a revolving lobby door, an executive leaves a position at Pfizer and slides right into a position at the FDA and then he or she can go right back to a pharmaceutical company to continue working

 

[bobjustbob]

It doesn't matter that these people are known to individually and collectively perpetuate their known frauds? They are in the business of selling fantasies. They all feed off the paranoia of people. Convincing them that they have found the real answers, the ones that others are hiding from us. Create a world of make believe and sell it as reality.

 

[eric2136]

It doesn't matter that these people are known to individually and collectively perpetuate their known frauds? They are in the business of selling fantasies. They all feed off the paranoia of people. Convincing them that they have found the real answers, the ones that others are hiding from us. Create a world of make believe and sell it as reality.

As I have stated. Ad Hominem arguments and attacks are irrelevant and, in general, an extremely benighted and nescient form of debate and discussion. Lazy and intellectually dishonest. Such arguments have no bearing whatsoever on the truth and validity of information provided.

Having researched and compiled the information regarding this issue, I know how long it takes to watch the videos which have been posted, absorb the information and perform critical analysis. To chose willful blindness, and close your mind to immensely important knowledge because you don't like the author is the epitome of ignorance, and an unfortunate indictment of your values and who you are as a person.

I have no problem with honest intellectual discussion or disagreement regarding certain facts or assertions based on contrary supported evidence, but to discount a recognized field of science simply because you don't understand it is just absurd.

 

[xfire]

 

[bobjustbob]

Wrong, wrong, wrong. You haven't used your critical analysis to consider the sources of your information. These people that you regard as informational have flaws in their credibility. They have been proven frauds in the past many times on more than one subject. I'll go find another 6 or 12 of your sources of information that also say that they talk to the dead. At what point will those that open up their minds, to the point that anything is possible, start to sort this nonsense out? Being intelligent is nothing if you don't have common sense. Denial of frauds is just standing in the way of viewing the real world.

 

[xfire]

 

[eric2136]

lol The real world..you wouldn't know the real world if it kicked you in the nuts lol ... As I said, my uncle worked for the FDA for 30 years, if you dispute the information regarding the relation between Pharmecutical companies and the FDA, or the field of science of Geo engineering, than you are a bigger idiot than I thought,,,,prattling on incessantly about who you think is or isn't a fraud is irrelevant…an Ad Hominem argument expressed a million different ways is still nothing more than an Ad Hominem argument…it is by definition a logical fallacy. You have yet to address the substance of the information provided in a credible and intelligent manner because you can't refute any of it, and you would probably make your self look like even a bigger idiot if you tried…

The video's provided are not just one persons perspective, it is a compilation of information from different sources, many of them observances by mainstream media reporters, meteorologists. etc. as well as military insiders who have confessed to what they a re doing, and their identities have been verified by several independent sources. So as I said, to dispute ANY information provided because you don't like who compiled it is beyond ridiculous.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. You haven't used your critical analysis to consider the sources of your information. These people that you regard as informational have flaws in their credibility. They have been proven frauds in the past many times on more than one subject. I'll go find another 6 or 12 of your sources of information that also say that they talk to the dead. At what point will those that open up their minds, to the point that anything is possible, start to sort this nonsense out? Being intelligent is nothing if you don't have common sense. Denial of frauds is just standing in the way of viewing the real world.

 

[bobjustbob]

I have already demonstrated, not just my opinion, that your compilation of information from different sources are frauds. Alex Jones? The guy that says government satellites are taking heat sensitive pictures of people leaving *** shows to follow them around? The guy that warned people that the government would turn off the power in our houses when they want to? The secret police are recruiting ****. Taking their ***** on the side of the road and making them write dossiers on their parents. This is your source for information? The news that no one else dares to report. The world that you live in. In the world that I live in there are no monsters living in my closet.

 

[eric2136]

As I said, my uncle worked for the FDA for 30 years, if you dispute the information regarding the relation between Pharmecutical companies and the FDA, or the field of science of Geo engineering, than you are a bigger idiot than I thought,,,,prattling on incessantly about who you think is or isn't a fraud is irrelevant…an Ad Hominem argument expressed a million different ways is still nothing more than an Ad Hominem argument…it is by definition a logical fallacy. You have yet to address the substance of the information provided in a credible and intelligent manner because you can't refute any of it, and you would probably make your self look like even a bigger idiot if you tried…

The video's provided are not just one persons perspective, it is a compilation of information from different sources, many of them observances by mainstream media reporters, meteorologists. etc. as well as military insiders who have confessed to what they a re doing, and their identities have been verified by several independent sources. So as I said, to dispute ANY information provided because you don't like who compiled it is beyond ridiculous.

I have already demonstrated, not just my opinion, that your compilation of information from different sources are frauds. Alex Jones? The guy that says government satellites are taking heat sensitive pictures of people leaving *** shows to follow them around? The guy that warned people that the government would turn off the power in our houses when they want to? The secret police are recruiting ****. Taking their ***** on the side of the road and making them write dossiers on their parents. This is your source for information? The news that no one else dares to report. The world that you live in. In the world that I live in there are no monsters living in my closet.

 

[eric2136]

In particular, your referring to the compilation observances by mainstream media reporters, meteorologists. etc. to be all frauds, even though you don't know any the reporters or meteorologists, or their observances, is stupid and pathetically asinine.

If you know nothing about the subject, and you don't want to know anything, than just move on…go sell stupid somewhere else.