Cheerleading Coach Carlie Beck Fired Over Nude Playboy Photos

Should she have been fired?


  • Total voters
    67
Posing for Playboy is nothing to be fired over. She didn't commit a crime or anything and posing nude is not a degrading thing to do. People in this country should stop being so Puritan like. We aren't in the 14th century anymore stop being so fucking uptight.
 
How is is a bad role model for a teacher to do something that's legal???

Teachers can drink in public can't they?

One of my teachers did. During school hours. Is that public enough? lol.

One day I was sitting there in class and the teacher passes me and I could smell Whiskey on his breath. So I said to him: Sir, have you been drinking?. He tried to look a little shocked and said: No. Now if he wasn't he could have got me punished for accusing him of that. But what he did was thirty seconds later he left the class room, two or three minutes passed and he came back, no smell of Whiskey on his breath at all. And about two or three years after I left High School I heard that he was let go aka given the bullet for being rat arsed during school hours.

Cheer Leading coaches like Carlie Christine that give you wood within seconds of looking at them SHOULD NOT BE FIRED but alcohol drinking teachers SHOULD. After all what Carlie did in her private life DID NOT interfere with her job at school. Unlike one of my old teachers who's private addictions entered his job's domain.

Carlie was fired because her employers have the brains of a beer can [each and every one of them] and the same goes the bitter parents who's slutty little daughters got denied a place on the cheerleading team through not being good enough. You dont miss classes and other things and then expect to get a role as a cheerleader, that requires disinpline and regular attendance too. So what made the little slut[who's parents reported Carlie] think that she was good for the team yet doesn't keep a good attendance.

Carlie's private life has FUCK ALL to do with her job as a cheerleading coach.
 
Playboy is an adult magazine. The people that pose in it are adults.

So first of all it has nothing to do with kids. If your kid is reading playboy, then that is your fault as a parent, not the magazines fault for existing.

How is that setting a bad example when it's an example that isn't being set? Kids are not reading playboy (or at least she is not encouraging them to) and they are not appearing in it.

Once they turn 18, then they can pose for it and/or buy it because they are now adults and it doesn't matter what the fuck thier parents think because it's not up to them to make that decision.

and if you are going to say "they look up to her as thier teacher so they will want to do what she did. " BULLSHIT! you obviously do not understand teenagers. That's probably the best way to get them NOT to grow up and be in playboy, since the thing that they want most is to be the exact opposite of thier teachers and parents.

Every stripper and pronstar I know (i'd say about a dozen) didn't have a teacher that posed nudes, so how does that fit that theory? In fact they all had parents that were moral authorities and showed "good examples" and just like my theory, they grew up to hate thier strict parents and go to the extreme opposite.
 
Bottom line is if the school system knew of her modeling history and they chose to hire her, they can't fire her for it.

She should follow through and achieve the American Dream now by Suing the Shit out of them.
 
Top