Cheerleading Coach Carlie Beck Fired Over Nude Playboy Photos
- Thread starter IloveErinAvery
- Start date
ChefChiTown
The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
If you work for the school district, you are working with children. If you work with children, you shouldn't be the type of person who poses in Playboy. Even though she took these photos before she was hired, it is still her responsibility to provide a proper example for the children that she works with. I know that everybody has their own opinion and a lot of people will have some weird way of justifying taking naked photos of yourself, for the whole world to see, BUT...
She works with kids, dude. That's a shitty example to be setting for the children she works with and I don't feel bad for her at all for being fired.
She works with kids, dude. That's a shitty example to be setting for the children she works with and I don't feel bad for her at all for being fired.
Re: Sigh ... she disclosed it even before being hired!
I don't know if it was a public school or not, but if it was the government doesn't have any business making contracts that force people to live a certain way outside of the workplace in the first place based on some moral judgment it might have on acts that aren't even illegal. My view seems like a completely valid point of reasoning to me.
I also find it amusing how people seem to think it's alright to make their own judgments based on what they think is wrong or is setting the wrong example in this instance. It especially seems hypocritical and ironic for people here to say that being in Playboy sets the wrong example, like it's inherently bad, even though it has nothing to do with her workplace. Who has the right to say what sets the wrong example? If somebody had a religion people didn't like, had a political postion that was in the minority and people didn't like, or they were openly homosexual, and a school wanted to fire them from their jobs because a lot of people didn't like it would everybody that doesn't think she should have her job also be fine with that? I don't see too much difference between those situations.
I don't know if it was a public school or not, but if it was the government doesn't have any business making contracts that force people to live a certain way outside of the workplace in the first place based on some moral judgment it might have on acts that aren't even illegal. My view seems like a completely valid point of reasoning to me.
I also find it amusing how people seem to think it's alright to make their own judgments based on what they think is wrong or is setting the wrong example in this instance. It especially seems hypocritical and ironic for people here to say that being in Playboy sets the wrong example, like it's inherently bad, even though it has nothing to do with her workplace. Who has the right to say what sets the wrong example? If somebody had a religion people didn't like, had a political postion that was in the minority and people didn't like, or they were openly homosexual, and a school wanted to fire them from their jobs because a lot of people didn't like it would everybody that doesn't think she should have her job also be fine with that? I don't see too much difference between those situations.
she works with cheerleaders it's not like she's working with members of the national honors society i think a playboy model is qualified to teach proper cheer technique
she is fuckin georgeous
First of all, I don't really give a shit, either way makes no difference to me.
She isn't even a teacher. She's a cheerleading coach.
If the school broke the law it should be looked into. But if not, it's up to them. Personally, I see no problem with keeping her if she's doing a good job. Firing someone over a Playboy spread is no better than firing someone because they're ugly - it's just as shallow. But everyone isn't as liberal as me or the FO board, and having a Playboy model teaching your children could easily spark a disliking or irritation in some parents. If a school rather fires someone than take that conflict I fully understand that.
She isn't even a teacher. She's a cheerleading coach.
If the school broke the law it should be looked into. But if not, it's up to them. Personally, I see no problem with keeping her if she's doing a good job. Firing someone over a Playboy spread is no better than firing someone because they're ugly - it's just as shallow. But everyone isn't as liberal as me or the FO board, and having a Playboy model teaching your children could easily spark a disliking or irritation in some parents. If a school rather fires someone than take that conflict I fully understand that.
She's a cheerleading coach....any of you guys have any youtube videos of the cheerleaders she was coaching by any chance? I'd love to see what she taught them 
ChefChiTown
The secret ingredient? MY BALLS
I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want my young, impressionable daughter learning anything from somebody who takes naked pictures of themselves and has them published in worldwide magazines.
Shame on that assholes who can fire a girl just cuz she is hot and sexy.
If they are ugly and shy losers with hangups, it is not a reason to demand the same loser behaviour and mousy lifestyle from other people.
She is hot and wants to share her beauty with many people. This is great! Naked body is amazing. Why not to give pleasure to other people by exposing it?
so... a baseball bat should violently penetrate every asshole of any hypocrite bigot who thinks that to get naked and show your sexuality is something prohibited and shameful.
when girl poses naked it can only be encouraged.
absolutley no arguments against it.
If they are ugly and shy losers with hangups, it is not a reason to demand the same loser behaviour and mousy lifestyle from other people.
She is hot and wants to share her beauty with many people. This is great! Naked body is amazing. Why not to give pleasure to other people by exposing it?
so... a baseball bat should violently penetrate every asshole of any hypocrite bigot who thinks that to get naked and show your sexuality is something prohibited and shameful.
when girl poses naked it can only be encouraged.
absolutley no arguments against it.
Probably bitter old farts that fired this woman. Wrinkled faced hags. Plus old timers with wifes that are LONG PASSED IT. Jealousy at it's best is all this is. By the way, Carlie is well fit. Infact saying she's well fit is an injustice to her beauty. She's ded seksi... I am off to look out my box of tissues and put them to good use.
Exactly.
What people don't seem to get is that a narrow mind goes both ways. If you expect someone to be okay with you being okay with something, you gotta be okay with being okay about others not being okay about it
Still doesn't remove the fact that ...
All these "opinions" still doesn't remove the fact that the school district is in breach of contract, and the tax payer is going to pay. It's sad that people can't think with their brain, instead of their asses.
She disclosed. They hired her. It was from before her hire. They are now liable for the breach, not her. Pretty simple case here. Thank you public officials!
Instead, at least 75% of the US still acts like children.
All these "opinions" still doesn't remove the fact that the school district is in breach of contract, and the tax payer is going to pay. It's sad that people can't think with their brain, instead of their asses.
She disclosed. They hired her. It was from before her hire. They are now liable for the breach, not her. Pretty simple case here. Thank you public officials!
Actually, your daughter might be exposed to the pros / cons of it all first-hand. In reality, if the US wasn't so judgemental, and everyone respectful, this wouldn't be an issue.
Instead, at least 75% of the US still acts like children.
^ maybe not, it depends on how long she was working. in some states within the first two weeks or first month (in others) a person may be let go without any reason or for any reason...but they may have fucked up by mentioning the playboy issue since they already knew
Kingfisher
Here Zombie, Zombie, Zombie...
How dare they fire someone so hot. Probably hired some uber-dyke coach that weighs 300 pounds.
Personally, I think the school was out of line. It would be one thing if she had openly talked or bragged about it to those under her charge or suggested that they do the same when they became old enough, but that doesn't seem to be the case. To me, for her job, all that matters is whether she conducted herself in a professional manner; her private life is hers to do with as she pleases. I don't buy the "role-model," notion, either; parents should be for their children the role models they seem to expect so many others to be.
I wanna see her do a spread with Crystal Gunns. Heck, Playboy should do a special issue featuring babes who got kicked out of their school jobs for being too dang hot.
I'm not an American, here's what I think of this situation.
The school district is in breach of contract because Ms. Beck had already informed them of her modeling career. They are estopped legally because they knowingly and willingly entered into a contract with Ms. Beck. Regardless of the aftermath (whether the girls who were cut off the squad were involved), it was the decision of the school district to allow Ms. Beck to coach the cheerleading squad. Had they not hired her in the first place, no controversy would have arisen.
The school district is in breach of contract because Ms. Beck had already informed them of her modeling career. They are estopped legally because they knowingly and willingly entered into a contract with Ms. Beck. Regardless of the aftermath (whether the girls who were cut off the squad were involved), it was the decision of the school district to allow Ms. Beck to coach the cheerleading squad. Had they not hired her in the first place, no controversy would have arisen.
well put
Similar threads
