Change of sig max size.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Smittmaestro

Center of the fothermucking universe
In more ways than one. :D

I'm now thinking 575x175

-cs™
 

MRPIMPN4EVA

Banned
I wish avatars could be 150x150.
 

Legzman

what the fuck you lookin at?
I wish avatars could be 150x150.

Lets just try and get the sig size altered for now! I'm not as worried about avy's as I spend much less time on those! I'm content with their size as it is!
 

bigbadbrody

Banned
I think whatever drdeath wants, should go:thumbsup:


seeing as he makes half the sigs here
 

member987

Closed Account
I was always under the impression that the sig limits were designed to make the board more user friendly for those on dial up. Large sigs make the pages load a lot slower, especially on dial up.

Personally, I like the sig limits. Also, I'd hate to see the mods given more "work" :eyeso:

:2 cents: :thumbsup: :hatsoff: :D
 
I think whatever drdeath wants, should go:thumbsup:


seeing as he makes half the sigs here

And UT and me the other half :1orglaugh

Who the Hell is still on dialup?

-cs™

I thought the exact same thing. Here in the UK dail up is only a pound cheaper than the cheapest broadband service. Plus everyone I know is on broadband :)




I am starting to think "what have I started here" :D . Sigs yes the height made bigger like I said before would be great.
But the avatars are hosted by the board and are perfect the way they are both size and bandwidth. If we increase them, we might have to lose something else :eek:
 
Who the Hell is still on dialup?

Of course I got dsl a month ago so I'm now an asshole about it! :D

-cs™
I'm on broadband as well, but I still suffer long load times for threads where members with several MB sigs have posted.:dunno:
 

Legzman

what the fuck you lookin at?
Same here, but I just accept it! My computer is about 3 years old now. Might have something to do with it!
 
I don't really know about that. I don't really know how old the various parts of my computer are.

I just rarely experience such problems, but perhaps the other forums I go to, just don't have members with sigs of such a size. Could it have anything to do with where people upload their sigs? :dunno:
 
Me, I love the more 'vertical' sigs... so I wouldn't be particularly interested in changing the dimensions into something a bit more square.
Then again, I just got my first sig a few weeks ago... ;)
 

Legzman

what the fuck you lookin at?
A lovely sig at that! :glugglug:
 
there is a wrestling forum i seldom go to. the sigs there are pretty big. if you were to take the three posts above me, that is the size of people's sigs there. they make the threads look like an ad page in the sunday paper. the pages look terrible. if more dimensions are added to the height, not too much more. :2 cents:
 
there is a wrestling forum i seldom go to. the sigs there are pretty big. if you were to take the three posts above me, that is the size of people's sigs there. they make the threads look like an ad page in the sunday paper. the pages look terrible. if more dimensions are added to the height, not too much more. :2 cents:
Agreed. Too tall sigs make pages look horrible. A problem is also that people are somewhat free to add text to their sig, either above or below a picture. In fact, some members total signature height is the double of what's currently allowed. If we are eventually allowed to have taller sigs, I hope this issue with also be looked at. Not that I'm against a line or two of text(I use it myself), but it could easily become too much.
 

MRPIMPN4EVA

Banned
So does any1 think Av's should go up to at least 100x100?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top