Brooke Marks

[JoeBlooso]

There's no secret plan of non nude models trying "sap as much money" out of anyone with a bait and switch type scam.

Nonsense. That's exactly what they're doing. If they weren't doing that, they'd put the following words on their sign-up page, right next to where you put the credit card number:

"I am non-nude. There are no shots of my pussy or tits within this website."

I'd guess the % of people who sign up on these NN websites for only a month or two, and then are disappointed there are no nudes inside, is well over 50% of the total traffic.

 

[MATUTE]

http://galleries3.petiteteenager.com/lol/brookemarksoffthestreets/

 

[MATUTE]

http://www.coedcherry.com/gallery/brooke-marks/279803

 

[axelstoner]

these are al old old galleries! any new or rare stuff:bowdown:

 

[sid-sexy]

She's a hottie
http://hottest-solo-girl.thumblogger.com/home/log/2009/52/brooke-marks-teal-bra.html

 

[dragonarial]

any news pics?

 

[channel100]

any news pics?

Some how I doubt it, even her own website is recycling old photos from July as new sets !!

 

[tyrone_biggums]

She's gorgeous - no question, but I never understand how these nn models can charge the same as a hc model for membership. If light beer is cheaper than real beer (Australian definition of light beer, that is), then so should light "porn" be cheaper than real porn.

haha love the beer reference.

i swear is some sets her fun bags look way bigger.

 

[Sirus804]

She better have an Xmas update or at least something for New Years.. and there better be tits goddamnit!

 

[RealTime]

She better have an Xmas update or at least something for New Years.. and there better be tits goddamnit!

There is no "she" anymore unless the webmaster is a she. Brooke hasn't been contributing new material to the site since the summer. All you can hope for is that the webmaster is still holding back some previously unreleased material. A shame, it was a great site for a while.

Don't be fooled by pimps like matute and maleonetwo pushing old promo material. All guys like that are concerned about is making a commission off a referral and they could care less, probably even than the current brookemarks.com webmasters, if they mislead people.

The only reason I still check here is that I'm curious to see if any info ever gets posted explaining what happened to bring it to an end.

 

[pimpollo41]

There is no "she" anymore unless the webmaster is a she. Brooke hasn't been contributing new material to the site since the summer. All you can hope for is that the webmaster is still holding back some previously unreleased material. A shame, it was a great site for a while.

Don't be fooled by pimps like matute and maleonetwo pushing old promo material. All guys like that are concerned about is making a commission off a referral and they could care less, probably even than the current brookemarks.com webmasters, if they mislead people.

The only reason I still check here is that I'm curious to see if any info ever gets posted explaining what happened to bring it to an end.

good to know..... I check for the same reason.

 

[Sirus804]

There is no "she" anymore unless the webmaster is a she. Brooke hasn't been contributing new material to the site since the summer. All you can hope for is that the webmaster is still holding back some previously unreleased material. A shame, it was a great site for a while.

Don't be fooled by pimps like matute and maleonetwo pushing old promo material. All guys like that are concerned about is making a commission off a referral and they could care less, probably even than the current brookemarks.com webmasters, if they mislead people.

The only reason I still check here is that I'm curious to see if any info ever gets posted explaining what happened to bring it to an end.

So the new videos of her slipping nipples like crazy and on purpose out of desperation because of lack of members on her site were already taken? I believe she is still part of the site.. just not as committed at all.

 

[Eastcoast1]

Nonsense. That's exactly what they're doing. If they weren't doing that, they'd put the following words on their sign-up page, right next to where you put the credit card number:

"I am non-nude. There are no shots of my pussy or tits within this website."

I catch your drift man - Really I do -
But I'm looking for nipples or pussy on that tour and I def. don't find them... The outside of the site shows no nudity, and it doesn't say she's naked inside, so why should I expect it?
A box of Devil Dogs shows some Devil Dogs... Should I be pissed when I open it and there are no Twinkies inside? Should the box say there are no Twinkies inside?

"This is a box of Devil Dogs, There are no Twinkies inside this box."

"Spunky" sites are the only sites I can think of WITH non nude tours that have full nudity inside. On Kate's Playground it says "members only" over her nipples. If I got inside and I didn't see nipples - THAT would be misleading.

Otherwise I don't see a standard of expectation being built anywhere else that would lead people to believe anything but their eyes. If you see tits there are tits, if you see no tits, there are no tits. This is the basic set up across the adult website world.

Nude sites like Real Peachez, Raven Riley, Apneatic, Pamela Spice, etc. are all showing nudity in the tour. So expect nudity inside.
Nikki Sims, Kari Sweets, Blueyed Cass and Spice Twins are not, so don't expect it.


That said, and I know it was a lot...

The internet newbie may have no idea that there is such a thing as non nude, and might be misled by his own expectations, which sucks. I hope he's at least aware that he can generally get a refund by contacting ccbill. Otherwise, non nude is a niche for tease fans, not a conspiracy. Get to know your adult niches before you start calling people you don't know anything about scammers:2 cents:

 

[Sirus804]

I catch your drift man - Really I do -
But I'm looking for nipples or pussy on that tour and I def. don't find them... The outside of the site shows no nudity, and it doesn't say she's naked inside, so why should I expect it?
A box of Devil Dogs shows some Devil Dogs... Should I be pissed when I open it and there are no Twinkies inside? Should the box say there are no Twinkies inside?

"This is a box of Devil Dogs, There are no Twinkies inside this box."

"Spunky" sites are the only sites I can think of WITH non nude tours that have full nudity inside. On Kate's Playground it says "members only" over her nipples. If I got inside and I didn't see nipples - THAT would be misleading.

Otherwise I don't see a standard of expectation being built anywhere else that would lead people to believe anything but their eyes. If you see tits there are tits, if you see no tits, there are no tits. This is the basic set up across the adult website world.

Nude sites like Real Peachez, Raven Riley, Apneatic, Pamela Spice, etc. are all showing nudity in the tour. So expect nudity inside.
Nikki Sims, Kari Sweets, Blueyed Cass and Spice Twins are not, so don't expect it.


That said, and I know it was a lot...

The internet newbie may have no idea that there is such a thing as non nude, and might be misled by his own expectations, which sucks. I hope he's at least aware that he can generally get a refund by contacting ccbill. Otherwise, non nude is a niche for tease fans, not a conspiracy. Get to know your adult niches before you start calling people you don't know anything about scammers:2 cents:

All that may be true but it doesn't change the fact that she is now showing a lil nipple to keep the money coming... If the money kept coming fine then she wouldn't be showing off her goods.

 

[Eastcoast1]

All that may be true but it doesn't change the fact that she is now showing a lil nipple to keep the money coming... If the money kept coming fine then she wouldn't be showing off her goods.

That may be true... I dunno, but it suits me, I like nipples
happy new year!

 

[RealTime]

I believe she is still part of the site.. just not as committed at all.

You may be right, my opinion was based on observation and not inside knowledge. It will be interesting to see what develops in 2010.

So the new videos of her slipping nipples like crazy and on purpose out of desperation because of lack of members on her site were already taken?

It didn't seem her most recent video had any more slips than her previous ones and the current photo set looks like an old one to me. But, I don't have an archive of previous shoots to confirm that. The "American flag" theme seems a bit out of place for this time of year if it was a new shoot though. Also, the "America Fuck Yeah" title just doesn't seem like her style.

 

[BPOnTheAir]

She started showing nipple a couple of years ago in a New Year's Webcam chat. It was at the end that she uncovered for not even two seconds and said "Happy New Year!" before putting her hands back over.

Since then, she's been willing to show a little more, but not much. She never shows a frontal view, only side. The only instance was a very blurry cam chat where she danced nude in front of a mirror, and someone zoomed the camera in.

However, she's been MIA for the last few months. Earlier this year, loads of people were complaining on her members forum about the amount of updates slowing down. As of about four months ago, the forum was completely removed, and a message about "the bitch boards are gone" or something to that effect was up.

I was a member there for a couple of years until this past summer. It's a complete shame she's gone. She mentioned on the forums that she was brewing up something in Hollywood and had to move there. She said her new agent told her to cut the live cam shows, and the updates started slowing down after that.

 

[JoeBlooso]

I catch your drift man - Really I do -
But I'm looking for nipples or pussy on that tour and I def. don't find them... The outside of the site shows no nudity, and it doesn't say she's naked inside, so why should I expect it?
A box of Devil Dogs shows some Devil Dogs... Should I be pissed when I open it and there are no Twinkies inside? Should the box say there are no Twinkies inside? . . . . Get to know your adult niches before you start calling people you don't know anything about scammers:2 cents:

First of all, I never used the word "scam." It's more like - intentionally deceptive
advertising. The people who run these sites know that many people will assume that there is nudity in the site. So, sure, you can say that it's "buyer beware." I could give a sh-t less either way, and I don't care about people expecting something that's not there. My only point is, I'd bet a huge proportion of the people signing up for these sites are newbs who are hoping they find some nudity inside the site.

Regarding your, "it doesn't say she's naked, so why should I expect it," that's just as silly comment. The equivalent isn't a devil dog box, it's the cover of "Jenna's revenge." The cover doesn't have images of her slutting it up, but you expect it to be in the box.

Like I said, I could care less about people spending their money on this, I'm just pointing out what I believe the main draw is of these sites - like BM and K. Sweets. I'm guessing they get most of their business from people who sign up looking for nudity and then cancel within a few months. The regulars who maintain memberships for a year or two are the oddballs.


Second, it's not about me "knowing my niche sites." As I made clear, it's about newbs who don't know how to use Internet search features to find the 4 minute video of Brooke with her tits out for about half of it.

The interesting question is, "what percent of people who sign up for the BM site would sign up if they knew that there was nothing there that you couldn't legally see in all the preview sets that are on the Net?"

My bet is - less than 50%.

 

[Eastcoast1]

Man, cooking up numbers and calling companies you know nothing about scammers isn't helping any newbs. Your whole argument is predicated on what is commonly referred to as "shit you made up."

We sell subscriptions to nonnude sites all the time with posts like this:
Nikki Sims Profile on SGA — We call her "Nonnude Nikki". Guys see it and buy it.

So no one buying from us thinks she's gonna get naked...
And I don't have to "bet." I know. "Nonnude Tease" is a niche with a large market. You are a person making things up. You are doing the exact thing you claim to be protesting. That is all.:yinyang:

 

[studiosxx]

http://www.*****************/watch.php?tag=L0zgQI3tu8