Brooke Marks

D

Dino24

Banned
How can I see the video? The option to join the website is down, along with Bailey Knox's and all the other sites associated with BM.
 
B

bjl12

Banned
Dino24 said:
How can I see the video? The option to join the website is down, along with Bailey Knox's and all the other sites associated with BM.
Click to expand...

I just checked the site out and joining was available. Hopefully if they took the site down it was for repairs. Don't know though
 
V

vectorious

So I just finished watching the new zipset. I heard rumors it was disappointing but I wanted to be the judge of that myself. To say that this is the worst video she has ever put out is an understatement. It's 28 minutes long, and at no point was there a redeeming part. NONE OF IT. MAYBE if it was in color it would have been half decent...but you can't see a thing the entire time. The worst part is that they charge you extra to watch this! Her zipsets are always known to be more revealing than her other content, but if this video went on sale for 25 cents I STILL wouldn't buy it after seeing it. Feel free to find out for yourself, but I promise you, you'll see more skin if you take a vacation to Somalia. :flaccid::lame:
 
Phad

Phad

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
vectorious said:
So I just finished watching the new zipset. I heard rumors it was disappointing but I wanted to be the judge of that myself. To say that this is the worst video she has ever put out is an understatement. It's 28 minutes long, and at no point was there a redeeming part. NONE OF IT. MAYBE if it was in color it would have been half decent...but you can't see a thing the entire time. The worst part is that they charge you extra to watch this! Her zipsets are always known to be more revealing than her other content, but if this video went on sale for 25 cents I STILL wouldn't buy it after seeing it. Feel free to find out for yourself, but I promise you, you'll see more skin if you take a vacation to Somalia. :flaccid::lame:
Click to expand...

Teleonicus you are such a weird hater. You obsessively critique so many little details of what Brooke and I work on, but you didn't stop to consider that the super-compressed tube version you stole makes it hard to see through the netting? There's a reason the real video is 880MB, and why took so long to come out. I had to render that video six extra times until I found the right max bitrate to keep the ghost from turning into artifacty mush. The reason is that when that net moves, it makes hundreds of little mesh details, and for those sections the bitrate needs to spike extremely high on a second pass. Have you ever seen a movie on Youtube where it suddenly starts to rain, and the quality of the video seems like it shifts down three steps as the encoder tried to keep up with the movement of hundreds of little details? That was happening on the first few renders, and definitely happened when it's put through a tube. But eventually I got the range right, and it fixed it.

Also, the high contrast and saturation made the details of nipples, pussy, and ass more noticeable, not less. There really was a lot of debate about whether certain shots in that video went too far, and despite all your lectures, we think it might have.

I also saw you call the Youtube version retarded. If you don't even like the "funny" side of Brooke's work, that's fine, but it means you're really in the wrong neighborhood. For her, that stuff comes first, and the skin will never be extreme. So you might want to take your own advice and enjoy Somalia.
 
V

vectorious

Phad said:
Teleonicus you are such a weird hater. You obsessively critique so many little details of what Brooke and I work on, but you didn't stop to consider that the super-compressed tube version you stole makes it hard to see through the netting? There's a reason the real video is 880MB, and why took so long to come out. I had to render that video six extra times until I found the right max bitrate to keep the ghost from turning into artifacty mush. The reason is that when that net moves, it makes hundreds of little mesh details, and for those sections the bitrate needs to spike extremely high on a second pass. Have you ever seen a movie on Youtube where it suddenly starts to rain, and the quality of the video seems like it shifts down three steps as the encoder tried to keep up with the movement of hundreds of little details? That was happening on the first few renders, and definitely happened when it's put through a tube. But eventually I got the range right, and it fixed it.

Also, the high contrast and saturation made the details of nipples, pussy, and ass more noticeable, not less. There really was a lot of debate about whether certain shots in that video went too far, and despite all your lectures, we think it might have.

I also saw you call the Youtube version retarded. If you don't even like the "funny" side of Brooke's work, that's fine, but it means you're really in the wrong neighborhood. For her, that stuff comes first, and the skin will never be extreme. So you might want to take your own advice and enjoy Somalia.
Click to expand...

Phad,

Let me begin by saying this; I appreciate you. I appreciate what you and Brooke put together. I'm not some immature little internet troll that tickles my jolleys by pissing you off, so please, spare me the elementary insults. It's super cool that you used your flux capacitor technology and when the lightning strikes the clocktower at just the right angle you can kinda make out a nip through the sheet for 1/8th of a second. Fact is, that doesn't change a thing. The video was lame. SUPER LAME. Funny, sure, but that's why the comedy genre exists. We follow Brooke because of her personality AND HER BODY...and this time, her body was covered up the whole time. It was a swing and a miss. It wouldn't have stung so bad if the release was not weeks late.
So with that said, feel free to call me a poopy head, shitbrick, or whatever other concoction of words you need to justify my behavior. But at the end of the day, Brooke's fans expected better on this one, and that was the only point I was trying to make. Good day.
 
Phad

Phad

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
vectorious said:
Phad,

Let me begin by saying this; I appreciate you. I appreciate what you and Brooke put together. I'm not some immature little internet troll that tickles my jolleys by pissing you off, so please, spare me the elementary insults. It's super cool that you used your flux capacitor technology and when the lightning strikes the clocktower at just the right angle you can kinda make out a nip through the sheet for 1/8th of a second. Fact is, that doesn't change a thing. The video was lame. SUPER LAME. Funny, sure, but that's why the comedy genre exists. We follow Brooke because of her personality AND HER BODY...and this time, her body was covered up the whole time. It was a swing and a miss. It wouldn't have stung so bad if the release was not weeks late.
So with that said, feel free to call me a poopy head, shitbrick, or whatever other concoction of words you need to justify my behavior. But at the end of the day, Brooke's fans expected better on this one, and that was the only point I was trying to make. Good day.
Click to expand...

What are you exactly? You're not a costumer, even though you like to criticize the "customer service."

How absurd for you to keep lecturing me on the timeliness of the release you stole. And rude of you to keep describing it wrong when you haven't seen a non-blurry copy.

I do listen to feedback, valid criticisms especially, and it effects what we make next. But you'd get my ear better if you dialed back that obnoxious approach. You're on Freeones talking about your piracy habits, don't you think that's a bit uncouth? And you're reviewing a blurry copy that someone else ruined and shouting it's the "SUPER LAME" "worst" "unredeemable" "crap" "horrific" thing we ever made, and then expect me to respect that feedback. You won't listen to an explanation of why your stolen copy became blurry, so your only point isn't a sharp one. When you eventually prompt someone to post the HD version over and over and over and have the pirates re-up it endlessly, maybe you'll see what I'm saying. And maybe you'll see some nudity you imagined wasn't there. Look at the screengrab from the real video, it's clear, vs the copy you're reacting to. See the differences? You can't even see the face on the Nic Cage pillow. Don't you think that compression could effect your employment of the video? That smiling pillow makes the video fappable, and you can't even see it smiling.
BrookeTube.jpg


And Brooke has never done open leg naked stuff like this. It's more than a fair envelope to push for a zip.
 
R

reaperwang

It still won't let me join her site. It just keeps saying, "please stand by, you are being redirected to ccbill", and then doesn't do anything.
I've been trying for days :brick:
 
E

Exizue

Apologies but i can see why people are dissapointed with this zip sets.
While i am rich and don't really mind and love brooke this video was bad:/
I enjoy her cam shows more even.. sorry but the coloring was just horrible
anyway i will keep subscribing... just giving my feedback
 
B

bjl12

Banned
Phad said:
Teleonicus you are such a weird hater. You obsessively critique so many little details of what Brooke and I work on, but you didn't stop to consider that the super-compressed tube version you stole makes it hard to see through the netting? There's a reason the real video is 880MB, and why took so long to come out. I had to render that video six extra times until I found the right max bitrate to keep the ghost from turning into artifacty mush. The reason is that when that net moves, it makes hundreds of little mesh details, and for those sections the bitrate needs to spike extremely high on a second pass. Have you ever seen a movie on Youtube where it suddenly starts to rain, and the quality of the video seems like it shifts down three steps as the encoder tried to keep up with the movement of hundreds of little details? That was happening on the first few renders, and definitely happened when it's put through a tube. But eventually I got the range right, and it fixed it.

Also, the high contrast and saturation made the details of nipples, pussy, and ass more noticeable, not less. There really was a lot of debate about whether certain shots in that video went too far, and despite all your lectures, we think it might have.

I also saw you call the Youtube version retarded. If you don't even like the "funny" side of Brooke's work, that's fine, but it means you're really in the wrong neighborhood. For her, that stuff comes first, and the skin will never be extreme. So you might want to take your own advice and enjoy Somalia.
Click to expand...

Phad serious question. Why am I unable to join BM? And why is there a filter on this zip? She did the Ghost video a year or so ago using the same fishnet thingy and that video was in 1080p (IIRC) and without filter. Why the filter for this one? Or at least why the filter the ENTIRE time?

Son I am disappoint :/
 
B

bjl12

Banned
Phad said:
What are you exactly? You're not a costumer, even though you like to criticize the "customer service."

How absurd for you to keep lecturing me on the timeliness of the release you stole. And rude of you to keep describing it wrong when you haven't seen a non-blurry copy.

I do listen to feedback, valid criticisms especially, and it effects what we make next. But you'd get my ear better if you dialed back that obnoxious approach. You're on Freeones talking about your piracy habits, don't you think that's a bit uncouth? And you're reviewing a blurry copy that someone else ruined and shouting it's the "SUPER LAME" "worst" "unredeemable" "crap" "horrific" thing we ever made, and then expect me to respect that feedback. You won't listen to an explanation of why your stolen copy became blurry, so your only point isn't a sharp one. When you eventually prompt someone to post the HD version over and over and over and have the pirates re-up it endlessly, maybe you'll see what I'm saying. And maybe you'll see some nudity you imagined wasn't there. Look at the screengrab from the real video, it's clear, vs the copy you're reacting to. See the differences? You can't even see the face on the Nic Cage pillow. Don't you think that compression could effect your employment of the video? That smiling pillow makes the video fappable, and you can't even see it smiling.
BrookeTube.jpg


And Brooke has never done open leg naked stuff like this. It's more than a fair envelope to push for a zip.
Click to expand...

And why can't I even pay for the damn zip? It's lmao? I try joining 3 different times and get 0 support. Like dude...wtf?

Also, I REALLY liked her positions. She was in very revealing positions and that KICKED ASS and I hope that's something that will happen more often. However, in the mean time, very dissatisfied with customer support.

Never heard of a paysite not accepting............MONEY.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Just the Teasers
Replies
11
Views
2K
pleaser39
P
Petra
>> Attend Episode 2 of Cosfans Live and get $15 to spend on clips! Hosted by Brook Logan!
Replies
0
Views
494
Petra
Petra
D
True Story: I Fucked two Girls in the same Night (Part 1)
Replies
0
Views
11K
denniswriter0
D
F
Who is this Big Titted Brunnette with Tattto on Left boob above nipple??
Replies
2
Views
704
fonzysnap
F
FreeOnes_Adam
Twistys Contest Winners! See who's going to fap themselves silly!
Replies
14
Views
6K
John_8581
John_8581
Top