Ugh.
The misconceptions going on are disheartening, especially when they get repeated over and over. When I try to explain details from behind the scenes, some people seem tempted to dispute it as propaganda. But whatever, I'll bash my head against the wall again and try one more time, because I'd like there to be a better dialogue about content. Suggestions make for better content, so I'm here to listen.
No one in Epic Panda ever said this was a "Blowjob Video". Did someone else on the internet? Maybe, but I don't know the answer to that, and can't supervise everything. What happens with affiliate programs is that other people, who
aren't coordinating with us, write their own blog text and ad copy to advertise an update. Sometimes they write it really fast (because who reads porn?), and usually it's just fluffy keyword-stuffed text for search engine results. And yeah, sometimes it might be intentionally misleading because they want clicks, but usually I'd have to say it's just hastily done. An affiliate might look at the promo gallery and make guesses about what the video has, or just spend two minutes writing whatever they think will get traffic or sales. This is widespread among adult sites, and it doesn't happen to just us. If you search for "so and so's naked pussy" you'll always find results for those keywords, even if the content doesn't really exist.
What I
did do is write
this post. Everything in that description technically happens in the video. It is hardcore, it has sex, cum, a real cock. If you want to parse out the words and say I should have qualified some of it like, "Bailey slides the cock into her pussy but it's not a close up and it's not brightly lit and her hand is sorta half in the way", then okay, I get your point. But that's how tease content tends to be - you do get something naughty, but it isn't always the full monty. And that's why I explained in the original post that Bailey shot this herself, so it has a self-shot quality. Self-shot is a type of video. That's why they called it "Our Sexy Tape", not anything else like "POV Bailey Blowjob", because THAT would have been misleading. Some people like self-shot content better, so saying that it's self-shot isn't necessarily a criticism.
I don't agree that this is "same old, same old" for Bailey. She shot ONE handjob zipset in 2014, and a lot of different non-nude content in between, so I don't think one more, homemade handjob with a different cock years later qualifies as run-of-the-mill. And no, I don't think it would have been appropriate as a regular site update. We can't regularly update her site with hardcore - she's a tease model. A lot of people asked for more zips like that handjob one, and we've asked, and it didn't happen. Finally it happened, and it's been a long time coming.
But before you flame me again for whatever you're angry about, here are the facts: I wasn't within 300 miles of the set when they were shooting it, and I didn't edit it either. I was told
after the fact, via text, "Hey, we shot a zipset tonight!" My response, "Cool, what is it?" Eventually I watched it and agreed it was a zipset. My other option would have been "sorry this isn't good enough", and I've actually done that a lot. Trust me, there have been some big debates between models and shooters and myself, some that have gone on for years, about whether a certain video should be a zipset, or an update, or nothing, etc. The price tag on an epic zip is definitely high, so I'm always pushing for longer run times, a solid concept, something unique about the video. "I danced around in a messy room and flashed a nipple"
shouldn't be a zipset, and other things like that. Models learn to want zips because they sell well, but I try to enforce a good standard, so that their fans will want the next one. An Epic Zip should be something way out of the ordinary for the paysite, and done as well as possible. If you want to argue the merits of this one being a zipset because of the grainy Go Pro doing poorly in low light or what have you, I've already said, I can see your point. But they definitely tried to make it good - there were four cameras, it wasn't rushed, and the content was unusual. So I said okay, it could be a zip.