BAILEY WENT HARDCORE.....AGAIN! - New Member's Only Zip on BaileyKnox.com!
Read all the yummy details and peek on some screencaps on our blog: EpicPanda.News
OMG YYYYYEEEEEEESSSSSS!!!!! is this going to be a start in a new direction?
BAILEY WENT HARDCORE.....AGAIN! - New Member's Only Zip on BaileyKnox.com!
Read all the yummy details and peek on some screencaps on our blog: EpicPanda.News
What a HUGE disappointment. Wouldn't take their definition of 'HD 1920x 1480' too seriously as it's no more HD than my Galaxy s5. The zips content, quality, and editing have honestly been garbage ever since her anal one. Could be worth it as a zip alone and NOT a zip AND membership but that's probably because nobody what's to subscribe to ANY of their inept network of websites from EpicNubs. My final review... save your curiosity, your not missing anything at all.
Have you not learned of their snake oil sale pitches yet? But don't take my word for it sign up and buy it to see for yourself... I cannot recommend it though and anyone who does is delusional.
I'm a huge Bailey Knox fan but her potential is being stunted.
Wtf do you mean no blowjob. There it is black on white (link above epic panda) that she buts her lips ond his cock. But there is a fucking and facial cum right?
Have you not learned of their snake oil sale pitches yet? But don't take my word for it sign up and buy it to see for yourself... I cannot recommend it though and anyone who does is delusional.
I'm a huge bailey knox fan but her potential is being stunted.
Hey man. I understand some of what you're saying, but let me explain a few things from the production side.
We're not dealing with pornstars here in the normal sense. For this situation, we couldn't set up lights, give direction, plan scenes, do dialogue. In fact, it's actually against their wishes to have anyone else even in the room, so that's not even on the table. And when it comes to pushing the envelope in a zipset, the rules about what can be shot and how it could work come from the model, not from us - it wouldn't happen otherwise. And without getting into too-much-information, this result, as much as we both might think it could be better - wasn't easy to come by. It was a spur of the moment thing done on Bailey's terms, hijacking Malloy's equipment. (I should also mention, I wasn't there).
The Go Pro doesn't do too well in low-light, like this bed room, so I agree there is some undesirable grain. But the stunt cock isn't a cameraman, so a Go Pro was a safe choice for him - at least it gets everything it faces. The SLRs we have (which they used as camera 2 and camera 3 in this video and those look good) need to be manually focused. So if he'd handheld one of those instead of a GoPro and wasn't paying attention or used to pulling focus, there's a good chance the whole thing would come out blurry. Mistakes like this have been made.
If we hire a pornstar and a professional stunt cock, we can shoot something perfectly lit, and storyboarded, and with close ups of whatever we want. But this isn't that - it's a non-nude tease model with a wild streak. What she's interested in doing swings from moment to moment. If we shot a pornstar though on our terms, you wouldn't care. So we're just doing the best we can with what we have to work with, and trying to keep the zipsets as interesting as they can be.
The question is : are we fooled with the description of the zipset ? does really her mouth comes in touch with that man's cock ?
I've heard enough reviews, they all say no bj, no penetration visible. Just handjob and some usual bullshit. Don't fall for their bait, the webmasters don't deserve a penny for this bait.
The question is : are we fooled with the description of the zipset ? does really her mouth comes in touch with that man's cock ?
Hey man. I understand some of what you're saying, but let me explain a few things from the production side.
We're not dealing with pornstars here in the normal sense. For this situation, we couldn't set up lights, give direction, plan scenes, do dialogue. In fact, it's actually against their wishes to have anyone else even in the room, so that's not even on the table. And when it comes to pushing the envelope in a zipset, the rules about what can be shot and how it could work come from the model, not from us - it wouldn't happen otherwise. And without getting into too-much-information, this result, as much as we both might think it could be better - wasn't easy to come by. It was a spur of the moment thing done on Bailey's terms, hijacking Malloy's equipment. (I should also mention, I wasn't there).
The Go Pro doesn't do too well in low-light, like this bed room, so I agree there is some undesirable grain. But the stunt cock isn't a cameraman, so a Go Pro was a safe choice for him - at least it gets everything it faces. The SLRs we have (which they used as camera 2 and camera 3 in this video and those look good) need to be manually focused. So if he'd handheld one of those instead of a GoPro and wasn't paying attention or used to pulling focus, there's a good chance the whole thing would come out blurry. Mistakes like this have been made.
If we hire a pornstar and a professional stunt cock, we can shoot something perfectly lit, and storyboarded, and with close ups of whatever we want. But this isn't that - it's a non-nude tease model with a wild streak. What she's interested in doing swings from moment to moment. If we shot a pornstar though on our terms, you wouldn't care. So we're just doing the best we can with what we have to work with, and trying to keep the zipsets as interesting as they can be.