• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Bailey Knox

What a HUGE disappointment. Wouldn't take their definition of 'HD 1920x 1480' too seriously as it's no more HD than my Galaxy s5. The zips content, quality, and editing have honestly been garbage ever since her anal one. Could be worth it as a zip alone and NOT a zip AND membership but that's probably because nobody what's to subscribe to ANY of their inept network of websites from EpicNubs. My final review... save your curiosity, your not missing anything at all.
 
What a HUGE disappointment. Wouldn't take their definition of 'HD 1920x 1480' too seriously as it's no more HD than my Galaxy s5. The zips content, quality, and editing have honestly been garbage ever since her anal one. Could be worth it as a zip alone and NOT a zip AND membership but that's probably because nobody what's to subscribe to ANY of their inept network of websites from EpicNubs. My final review... save your curiosity, your not missing anything at all.

no bj so ? :(
 
No blowjob, she catches herself when she tries and gives a look on her face, 'oh I'm not allowed'. Not even in a tease way but in a 'oh my webmasters are fucking Nazis way'
 
Wtf do you mean no blowjob. There it is black on white (link above epic panda) that she buts her lips ond his cock. But there is a fucking and facial cum right?
 
Have you not learned of their snake oil sale pitches yet? But don't take my word for it sign up and buy it to see for yourself... I cannot recommend it though and anyone who does is delusional.

I'm a huge Bailey Knox fan but her potential is being stunted.
 
Last edited:

Phad

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
Have you not learned of their snake oil sale pitches yet? But don't take my word for it sign up and buy it to see for yourself... I cannot recommend it though and anyone who does is delusional.

I'm a huge bailey knox fan but her potential is being stunted.

Hey man. I understand some of what you're saying, but let me explain a few things from the production side.

We're not dealing with pornstars here in the normal sense. For this situation, we couldn't set up lights, give direction, plan scenes, do dialogue. In fact, it's actually against their wishes to have anyone else even in the room, so that's not even on the table. And when it comes to pushing the envelope in a zipset, the rules about what can be shot and how it could work come from the model, not from us - it wouldn't happen otherwise. And without getting into too-much-information, this result, as much as we both might think it could be better - wasn't easy to come by. It was a spur of the moment thing done on Bailey's terms, hijacking Malloy's equipment. (I should also mention, I wasn't there).

The Go Pro doesn't do too well in low-light, like this bed room, so I agree there is some undesirable grain. But the stunt cock isn't a cameraman, so a Go Pro was a safe choice for him - at least it gets everything it faces. The SLRs we have (which they used as camera 2 and camera 3 in this video and those look good) need to be manually focused. So if he'd handheld one of those instead of a GoPro and wasn't paying attention or used to pulling focus, there's a good chance the whole thing would come out blurry. Mistakes like this have been made.

If we hire a pornstar and a professional stunt cock, we can shoot something perfectly lit, and storyboarded, and with close ups of whatever we want. But this isn't that - it's a non-nude tease model with a wild streak. What she's interested in doing swings from moment to moment. If we shot a pornstar though on our terms, you wouldn't care. So we're just doing the best we can with what we have to work with, and trying to keep the zipsets as interesting as they can be.
 
Hey man. I understand some of what you're saying, but let me explain a few things from the production side.

We're not dealing with pornstars here in the normal sense. For this situation, we couldn't set up lights, give direction, plan scenes, do dialogue. In fact, it's actually against their wishes to have anyone else even in the room, so that's not even on the table. And when it comes to pushing the envelope in a zipset, the rules about what can be shot and how it could work come from the model, not from us - it wouldn't happen otherwise. And without getting into too-much-information, this result, as much as we both might think it could be better - wasn't easy to come by. It was a spur of the moment thing done on Bailey's terms, hijacking Malloy's equipment. (I should also mention, I wasn't there).

The Go Pro doesn't do too well in low-light, like this bed room, so I agree there is some undesirable grain. But the stunt cock isn't a cameraman, so a Go Pro was a safe choice for him - at least it gets everything it faces. The SLRs we have (which they used as camera 2 and camera 3 in this video and those look good) need to be manually focused. So if he'd handheld one of those instead of a GoPro and wasn't paying attention or used to pulling focus, there's a good chance the whole thing would come out blurry. Mistakes like this have been made.

If we hire a pornstar and a professional stunt cock, we can shoot something perfectly lit, and storyboarded, and with close ups of whatever we want. But this isn't that - it's a non-nude tease model with a wild streak. What she's interested in doing swings from moment to moment. If we shot a pornstar though on our terms, you wouldn't care. So we're just doing the best we can with what we have to work with, and trying to keep the zipsets as interesting as they can be.

The question is : are we fooled with the description of the zipset ? does really her mouth comes in touch with that man's cock ?
 

mriwck

Banned
I've heard enough reviews, they all say no bj, no penetration visible. Just handjob and some usual bullshit. Don't fall for their bait, the webmasters don't deserve a penny for this bait.
 

Phad

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
The question is : are we fooled with the description of the zipset ? does really her mouth comes in touch with that man's cock ?

Whose description? Her mouth comes into contact with the cock lots of times - she kisses the tip, lubes it up, bounces the dick off her tongue at the end when she's waiting for cum. I wouldn't call it a blowjob video, but there's contact.
 
Hey man. I understand some of what you're saying, but let me explain a few things from the production side.

We're not dealing with pornstars here in the normal sense. For this situation, we couldn't set up lights, give direction, plan scenes, do dialogue. In fact, it's actually against their wishes to have anyone else even in the room, so that's not even on the table. And when it comes to pushing the envelope in a zipset, the rules about what can be shot and how it could work come from the model, not from us - it wouldn't happen otherwise. And without getting into too-much-information, this result, as much as we both might think it could be better - wasn't easy to come by. It was a spur of the moment thing done on Bailey's terms, hijacking Malloy's equipment. (I should also mention, I wasn't there).

The Go Pro doesn't do too well in low-light, like this bed room, so I agree there is some undesirable grain. But the stunt cock isn't a cameraman, so a Go Pro was a safe choice for him - at least it gets everything it faces. The SLRs we have (which they used as camera 2 and camera 3 in this video and those look good) need to be manually focused. So if he'd handheld one of those instead of a GoPro and wasn't paying attention or used to pulling focus, there's a good chance the whole thing would come out blurry. Mistakes like this have been made.

If we hire a pornstar and a professional stunt cock, we can shoot something perfectly lit, and storyboarded, and with close ups of whatever we want. But this isn't that - it's a non-nude tease model with a wild streak. What she's interested in doing swings from moment to moment. If we shot a pornstar though on our terms, you wouldn't care. So we're just doing the best we can with what we have to work with, and trying to keep the zipsets as interesting as they can be.

So while you're being honest may I ask is it safe to assume then that Brooke Marks isn't comfortable with much anymore then? Cause the Halloween zip got deleted/no longer purchasable last time I subscribed and there's been a supreme lack of content since then, looks like just the same ole things over and over and becoming less and less frequent with the updates. And more than 6 months since the last meh zipset with no word of another. The way she always made it seem is that it's the opposite, she can't do more cause "she'd get in trouble", that's how she always acted in her cam shows anyway so I'm surprised to hear you say it's mostly up to them. Anyways, I'd like to know before I consider resubscribing because the value for Brooke's site doesn't look like it's been there lately and before your post my tendency would have been to assume it's productions fault holding her back, where as maybe it's the really not and you're getting undeserved blame based on what you said.
 
So why even do it when you know right off the bat its garbage? And still charge people for the set AND a membership? It woulda been justified way more if it was just the zip set or just a regular update to the site.

If it wasn't for her camshows, where she's really a genuine bad ass everyone needs to watch her camshows instead, I woulda moved on years ago. And she's repeatedly said how much she loves teasing while still slipping here and there... how much more awesome can she get?

But there's not much excuse for this zip set to essentially charge people twice for it who just want the set... or want to just sign up for her camshows its not like there's much more updates than that which is fine cause her camshows thankfully make up for it.
 
Top